dark light

John1964

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Time again #2016617
    John1964
    Participant

    My personal opinion is that the CVF should be built as a CTOL carrier:

    1) Opens up options for alternate aircraft, my preference is for Super Hornet.

    2) F-35B’s could always be cat launched (as was planned for the P1154),

    3) It provides full cross decking facilities with the USN,

    4) It would allow the purchase of E2 Hawkeye’s with its much better performance than the AEW Seaking or the potential replacement.

    I also believe that the power plant should be more powerful to allow station keeping with the US carriers.

    Also they should be better armed, at least add RAM but preferrably ASTER 15.

    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #2018382
    John1964
    Participant

    cant the chinese not rather buy a second hand nimitz-class…i think it will be decades before the boat goes afloat and being obsolete before being in active duty….:D:rolleyes:

    Obsolete, is a very overused word, particulary in this regard where the primary weapon is not the carrier but its aircraft, obsolecant would be more appropriate. However in this case I would still beel neither is appropriate – is anyone describing the Invincible’s in those term, or Garibaldi or Sao Paolo. If you were applying those terms the the Cavour is obsolete. Essentialy it is a big flat deck to land aircraft for (and it is unlikely that any aircraft will be introduced in the foreseeable future that it cannot possibly handle) – so how can it become obsolete.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Outlook #2018446
    John1964
    Participant

    With regards to the comment about the size of Argus, she was a conversion of an existing hull not a custom design, to a degree her role has expanded to fill the space, she was originally intended to be a helo training ship and aircraft ferry. Remember that the preceding helo training ship Engadine displaced barely more than a destroyer and most of the hull was void, and before that was the Lofoten which was a converted LST.

    Just an idea, why not build the two hospital ships, using “civilian” funds, in the way the Italians funded the third San Giorgio. Then fund their operation through whichever Quango takes care of international aid, and use the ships for disaster relief. Then in the even of military need requisition them for the RFA.

    With regard to ships ownership, I do not think that lines are ownership are that clear, it is not like the days when shipping lines adopted flags of convenience but the ships were still owned by a single company. Looking at the cruise industry, the apparantly British cruise line’s P&O and Cunard, are part of the Carnival Corporation and American Company. Also the crews are a mish mash of different nationalities, you may have a Bermuda Registered ship but its Captain and Chief Engineer could be Italian.

    As has been stated over and over again – for what was a maritime nation – we have effectively destroyed our merchant fleet. To a large degree the American’s have done the same but when push comes to shove they can feed themselves!!!!!

    in reply to: Royal Navy Outlook #2018516
    John1964
    Participant

    One of the reasons for the construction of the Point class ro-ro ships was the lack of suitable British tonnage for use in times of need.During Desert Storm foreign registered vessels were chartered to transport heavy equipment to the Mid East, many were considered to be deficient in aspects of sea keeping and safety, therefore the MOD decided to build their own for future use.

    We would have difficulty nicking – or more properly – requisitioning any cruise ships, the only two cruise ship I am relatively certain could be requisitioned are the QM2 and Queen Victoria as they are the only cruise ship registered in the UK, all of the P&O ships are registered in Bermuda, so I am unsure what the position of those would be, the rest who knows. Many of the ferries are also flying flags of convenience – the last time I saw an Isle of Man ferry is was registered in Nassau?!?!

    Therefore if you did wish to obtain the services of a cruise ship you would be looking at having to charter it, which would be prohibitively expensive (I would guess a cruise line would be looking at £3mill per week for a 2,000 pax ship), and not many cruise lines would be willing to let you have one of their cruiseship recently upgraded to the latest safety standards (Solas 2010). You would then be left with the older vessels which do not meet up to date safety standards and are ready to be withdrawn.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Outlook #2018557
    John1964
    Participant

    Canberra!!!!

    Have a look at this:

    http://www.sscanberra.com/

    If you look in the photo section there are some really interesting pictures of the ship being scrapped in Alang.

    I worked for P&O in the 90’s, and the rumour was that during the famous shots of the Great White Whale in San Carlos Water, the entire board of P&O were on their knees praying that she was sunk.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Outlook #2018572
    John1964
    Participant

    Found the Cambria, she was built as the St Anselm for Sealink and became the Cambria after Sealink was taken over by Stena in 1991, she apparantley did not participate in the Falkands Conflict:

    http://www.simplonpc.co.uk/PandO-StenaLine.html

    http://www.ferry-site.dk/ferry.php?id=7813937&lang=en

    Again hope this is of help.

    Regards.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Outlook #2018575
    John1964
    Participant

    Did my own search on Google, love finding things out (think I want to be a P.I.). I couldn’t recall the name as being one of the STUFT ships, and I found this list on WIKI (I know):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_naval_forces_in_the_Falklands_War

    Could it be the Tor Caledonia your after?

    http://www.simplonpc.co.uk/DFDS_TOR_Line.html

    Or the St Edmund which is the only name I can match with Sealink – it was purchased; as the Keren, after the conflict for trooping duties between Ascension and the Falkands until the completion of Mt Pleasant air field that could take heavy aircraft.

    http://www.simplonpc.co.uk/BR8_Harwich.html

    Hope this is of help.

    in reply to: HMS Victorious #2018580
    John1964
    Participant

    IMHO I would think that after paying for the Phantoms and Bucanneers nothing would have been left in the purse for any additional aircraft, plus there is no role that couldn’t be done by them, so no need for Sea Jaguar.

    Neither can I see a pressing need for S Harrier, more likely an evolution along the lines of the U.S. with the us initially of GR3 type aircraft (with basic marinisation) off helo carriers, then AV8B with improved air to ground.

    I would then predict that the Phantoms and Bucs would be replaced either by marinised version of Eurofighter (based on history a bad option), or more sensibly by F18’s. I don’t think that; sadly, Tomcat would have been an option, unless the USN had continued production of the F14D or better (the Phantoms would have been too new to be replaced by F14’s and would have been regarded as too expensive).

    in reply to: Helicopter question #2413333
    John1964
    Participant

    Are helicopters equiped with ‘Fenestron’ tail rotors any less vulnerable to RPGs?:confused:

    Apologies, wrongly worded question, it should have been:

    Would it have performed better with a fenestron?

    Regards.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2018800
    John1964
    Participant

    No. It’s rather fat, isn’t it?

    And not very pointy?

    Looks more like a cruise missile to me.

    Cool picture though.

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2019004
    John1964
    Participant

    Same for me the Google Earth image of my home town is at least three years old.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2019467
    John1964
    Participant

    Minor question, and slightly O/T. The cover on the Goalkeeper, I assume it would be removed if a ship went to GQ? However if the ship were attacked by without warning how would the cover be removed, could the gun just shoot through the cover, or would the initial round remove it or is the system U/S until the cover is removed by hand?

    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #2019905
    John1964
    Participant

    Where will the Chinese have obtained the engines and boilers from, have they got a domestic scource, or will they have managed to purchase them from Russia or Ukraine? If they have been obtained domestically what steam conditions will it they have?

    I would agree that the easiest way to install new machinery would be by cutting a hole in the hull side; although the hull structure/framing would have to be taken into account. I have worked on a cruise ship when work on the engine room necessitated a relatively small hole to be cut in the hull, to do work in the engine room and install outsized items – new evaporators if I recall correctly. It was also a way that a large numbers of new TV’s were smuggled of the ship during the night:eek:.

    I still; based on the information on the refit/rebuild of Victorious, find it rather strange that the ship was built to the stage it was without having engines and boilers fitted?

    in reply to: Lets make a better Calendar!!! #2022552
    John1964
    Participant

    OT what is the structure on the stern of the CdeG? Is it a housing for diesel generators which requires the exhaust?

Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)