dark light

Deryck

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wartime photographs. #1132306
    Deryck
    Participant

    It was illegal to take photographs anywhere near a military installation. Every public access route was posted.

    Neither film nor processing was available to the general public. Some Aircrew were able to get some military film and cut it to the correct size to fit their cameras and then get the Photo Section to process it, but for the enthusiast, no film, no pictures and it was even illegal to make sketches!

    When the Americans joined in they had access to film through the PX but you had to know an American who was willing to buy the film for you and get it processed.

    I managed to get one roll of Geavert (Belgium or Dutch) film at the end of war but the local chemist messed up the processing, either due to his lack of skills or due to his lack of suitable developer!

    in reply to: Wartime photographs. #1129919
    Deryck
    Participant

    The propaganda bureau, the Ministry of Information, made sure that there was adequate film made available to the Press and the Movie News folks but it just was not available to the general public.

    in reply to: Lancaster bomb loads #1119816
    Deryck
    Participant

    From my recollection the nose and tail fuses were installed by the armourers when loading the bombs.

    Usually there would be an arming wire run from each fuse and this was attached to the aircraft. When the bombs were released the arming wires were pulled out and the fuses then started to arm themselves by the small propellors on each fuse. The bombs had to fall a specified distance before they were armed. This then allowed the aircraft to dump the bombs on takeoff, should they lose an engine, without destroying friendly folks and potentially themselves.

    Unlike the B-17’s and 24’s there was no access to the bomb fuses in the bomb bays of the Lanc and the Halifax once the aircraft took off.

    in reply to: Lancaster bomb loads #1119520
    Deryck
    Participant

    Unfortunately, if the current thinking is true, Major Glen Miller wishes that they could have been jettisoned “safe”. I am only familiar with the US type of bombs so I cannot speak for the HC types.

    In the B-17, and probably the B-24, it would have been possible to unhook the arming wires from the bomb racks and bend the part of the wire that was fed through the fuses so that it could not fall out and then dump the arming wires with the bombs. That way the propellors would not spin and the fuses would not arm. You would have to be quite agile in order to reach all the four bomb racks and it would not be a pleasant exercise!

    In the 8th Air Force the bombs were loaded with two 48″ long (or so) lengths of wire connected to a ring in the middle. The ring was hooked onto the bomb rack. When the aircraft landed the bomb bay was a tangled mess or arming wires, all of which were disposed of. We never wanted for bits of wire! If the RAF figured out a better way, good for them!

    in reply to: Accidents whilst servicing ejection seats. #798900
    Deryck
    Participant

    Meteor Mk8 at the ASF Hanger, Waterbeach, in 1954 or 55.

    The Meatbox was coming in for servicing and it was parked between the ASF hangar and the Clothing Stores, the riggers had removed the canopy and the Armourer was standing in the seat working on disarming the top cartridge. For some reason the cartridge fired and the seat came up and hit him in the face.

    The armourer should have safety pinned the top cartridge and removed the second charge in the back of the seat before attempting to remove the top cartridge, but he had not and the seat went through the full ejection cycle sending him high in the air, the seat landed on the roof of the Clothing Stores and the armourer fell and hit the horizontal tailplane of the Meteor.

    He survived, but he spent a long, long time in hospital but I do not know how long he was kept in. He was a National Serviceman who was coming to the end of his service when the incident happened. The RAF kept him in the service until he recovered.

    Why did it happen? Who knows? Was he distracted by his soon-to-be-discharge?

    As an engine mechanic we were told that the sequence for disarming the ejector seat was to insert the safety pin into the top firing mechanism and to always remove the mid-travel, large cartridge in the back of the seat, before attempting to remove the top cartridge firing mechanism.

    in reply to: Airworthy Venom's And Vampire's #821315
    Deryck
    Participant

    With regard to the question of John Travolta’s Vampire F3, Registration N6878D, assigned serial number VP773, built for the RAF, but was transferred to the RCAF and given the serial number 17072 .

    The aircraft made an emergency, wheels up, landing after engine failure at “Wings over Rochester” show in 2009 and the remains are currently in storage at the Air, Land and Sea Museum at Markham Airport.

    The last I heard was that it had been acquired by the National Air Force Museum of Canada at Trenton. Their shop is busy right now with restoration of their Lancaster which is scheduled for completion for the 100th
    Anniversary of the founding of the Royal Canadian Air Force in June 2024.

    in reply to: Merlin engine stand #838733
    Deryck
    Participant

    Jules,

    Another PM sent regarding stand dimensions.

    Deryck

    in reply to: Merlin engine stand #787996
    Deryck
    Participant

    PM sent re dimensions.

    Deryck

    in reply to: Merlin engine stand #790831
    Deryck
    Participant

    Yes, Thanks, we can probably work out the dimensions from our display Merlin.

    Deryck

    in reply to: Merlin engine stand #790833
    Deryck
    Participant

    Hi Rocketeer,

    PM sent.

    Deryck

    in reply to: Merlin engine stand #791690
    Deryck
    Participant

    Rocketeer, we are getting organized to dismantle Lancaster KB 882 and we need to build 4 Merlin engine stands, we would really appreciate a copy of any drawings you might have on the subject.

    Deryck

    in reply to: Little Staughton Airfield – 2009 Thread Revived #831253
    Deryck
    Participant

    As a kid I used to cycle to Kimbolton School every day and some days the Lancs would be returning from their night missions as I went past.

    This would have been in the 1942 to 1948 time frame.

    I did not find the RAF ground crews at Little Staughton very friendly as we sometimes stopped to watch the activities on the hardstandings close to the road.

    When the Americans arrived and took over the adjacent bases at Kimbolton, Thurleigh, Molesworth, etc. they always invited us in to look at the aircraft, provided they were not being prepared to fly.

    Interesting days to be a kid! Unfortunately we were unable to get film for our cameras and if we could we were not able to get it developed. There were many signs pointing out the various things that could be done to you is you were caught taking photos or making sketches!

    We were able to get the odd GI serviceman to buy a roll of film from the PX for us, but we were not able to get it processed until the war was over and any pictures I took did not come out too well when processed, a problem they said with the developer chemicals.

    Deryck
    Participant

    Ronl

    I seem to be unable to send a response to your most recent PM. I did not have a problem with your earlier ones.

    “I have one more quick question. I was watching a video on NA 337, and saw a clip of someone opening up the covers on the drop hole opening which would have been where the mid under gunner would have accessed the PG turret. Are those covers heavy? I have read an account from a MU gunner where he stated that he climbed down into the turret and then closed the covers over himself. That wouldn’t have been too much fun. I’m just curious how heavy they are, as the gunner would have to open them from the turret to get out, and they look fairly heavy in the video clip.”

    The doors were made from 3/4″ thick plywood with the checkered tiles on top. The floor opening was about 4 ft square and each door was about 48″ by 24″. They were not heavy but awkward. The space between the floor surface and the bottom of the fuselage is not sufficient to crawl into and close the 3/4″ thick doors. The reference to closing the doors probably referred to closing the turret doors.

    The Halifax was unable to climb to the same attack altitude as the Lancaster and the Halifax crews would not have been looking forward to adding the weight of an extra turret, the ammunition and an additional crew member.

    in reply to: Seeking Avro Anson plans #836827
    Deryck
    Participant

    Avro Heritage has a large number of Anson drawings available.

    in reply to: The YAM Halifax #840627
    Deryck
    Participant

    Cees, I seem to recollect that the undercarriage leg was taken from RAF Museum Cardington Storage and YAM made fiberglass moulds from it. The moulds were sent to Trenton for us to use to make the ‘covers’ for NA 337’s structural legs. I believe Karl now has them.

    I seem to recollect that the RAF Cardington and Henlow storage facilities were being cleared out and when we enquired as to what had happened to the original undercarriage leg, Ian Robinson said that it was still lying on the floor at YAM.

    Was it in fact ever returned to the RAF Museum?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 195 total)