dark light

13012902

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How bad can Discovery Wings get? #1342817
    13012902
    Participant

    Discovery Wings

    I have to agree, Discovery Wings do re-cycle programmes with ludicrous frequency. Surely they can manage to find others to fill the slots…
    I seem to recall one of the other channels ran a series called “Project Cancelled”, don’t remember whether it was a Dicovery or History channel, but they were interesting programmes. Unfortunately they seem to have “dropped out of the sky” so to speak and I haven’t seen any of them for ages.

    in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2056142
    13012902
    Participant

    Favourite Warship

    Always sorry that I just missed seeing her.

    From a purely selfish and Nationalistic point of view, it has to be H.M.S. Vanguard. Although surrounded by many a myth, still must be the best overall battleship ever built.

    in reply to: Vickers Valiant B.2 #1399273
    13012902
    Participant

    Valaint B2 & Avro 730

    We now have images for all to see what one aircraft looked like, and both the earlier and final versions of the intended 730.
    The Avro 730 was originally designed against R.156, as a purely reconaisance aircraft carrying the then very large array for Red Drover radar.
    Later development of the radar allowed for a reduction in it’s overall size, and the aircraft design was re-worked to include a bomb-bay for the intended “Blue Rosette” bomb, which weighed approx 7,000 lbs.
    The earlier version of the aircraft was intended to be powered by four Armstrong Siddeley P.159’s (20,750 lbs thrust), the later and final intended designe was to use eight P.176’s (4,400 lbs thrust).
    Range with full internal fueld was to be 4,280 n.miles, maximun ceiling 66,000 ft.

    in reply to: Vickers Valiant B.2 #1399276
    13012902
    Participant

    Valiant B2

    Two sets of pictures of the one and only Valiant B2.
    Apologies for quality, but had to scan B&W pics. from books then re-size.

    in reply to: Vickers Valiant B.2 #1402353
    13012902
    Participant

    ValiantB2/Avro 730

    As I have already said, I will post more tech. info about both aircraft, and add to history of 730. In the meantime, here are some might-have-been images of the 730 I found whilst surfing.
    One interesting point about the 730 is that RAF studies started two years before the USAF, whose study reached hardware in the shape of the Lockheed SR71!

    in reply to: Two photos of TSR.2 test flight. #1402407
    13012902
    Participant

    TSR2 Images

    Found these, two are “what might have beens” but still make interesting viewing.

    in reply to: Vickers Valiant B.2 #1405072
    13012902
    Participant

    Valiant B2 (& Avro 730)

    Will get the specs together for the B2, suffice it to say that whilst the Valiant B1 was indeed the “interim design” for the V-force, the B2 was a privately produced design by Vickers Armstrong that was far-sighted for it’s day. but unfortunately, the requirement for low level capability was not recognised by the RAF/Governments of the day until after they had cancelled and scrapped the only B2 (Serial WJ954) which first flew on 04/0953, this was also dubbed the Pathfinder as that was the originally and by then outmoded role that the RAF would have had for it.
    She was designed to fly as full throttle at low level. Whereas the regular Valiant was redlined at 414 mph at sea level, the B2 (Type 673) was made strong enough to fly at full power at sea level, reaching 552 mph.
    The most obvious change was the main undercarriage, which no longer required cuts into the wings, and were a four-wheel bogie arrangment which folded rearwards into streamlined boxes (these became a familiar sight on many later Tupolev bomber designs).
    Original powerplants were to have been Rolls-Royce RB.80 bypass jets (later to become the Conway), but the one and only prototype was powered by Avon RA.14’s of the uprated 200-series.
    Originally there was a tentatuive production order for I think 17 aircraft, but this was later cancelled, and the one and only bomber which the RAF should have bought was scrapped in 1958.

    The Avro 730 was the “successful” candidate for a high-speed (appx. M3) high level reconaisance bomber to an RAF requirement issued in the early 1950’s!
    The prototype was actually partially assembled when the infamous 1957 Defence White Paper saw it end its days cut up into giant circular waste bins!

    I’ll retrieve some more detailed info from my books later and return with details on both aircraft.
    (when I manage to crack uploading images, we’ll maybe get some illustrations as well).

    in reply to: Vickers Valiant B.2 #1407228
    13012902
    Participant

    Valiant B2

    Sorry to disagree, but spar configuration was markedly different to the B1, and overall the B2 was a much more strongly built aircraft.

    in reply to: Fairey Rotodyne #1407904
    13012902
    Participant

    Rotodyne

    I know this is an “old” question, but having recently joined the forum. Found the following a while ago ref the Rotodyne.
    try: avia.russian.ee/vertigo/fairey_rotodyne-rhtml

    Additionally Westland Helicopters site give some interesting details of the Rotodyne, and their Westminster Large Helicopter.

    Regards

    in reply to: Two photos of TSR.2 test flight. #1410629
    13012902
    Participant

    TSR2 Photos

    This has always been a favourite of mine, along with the Valiant Mk2 low level bomber (which would not have fallen apart like the Mk1’s!!!)

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)