dark light

darrenharbar

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 720 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chipmunk Books #1278209
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    There was a supplement by Bill Fisher published by Aviation News many years back. Don’t know if any will still be out there, but it was called Chipmunk – the first forty years.

    in reply to: Air to air in 2007 by Darren Harbar #518184
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    I won’t be popular by making this comment but can I ask Darren why he needs to virtually obliterate his images by watermarking and self promotion? Your air to air photography is outstanding, but is nonetheless on a par with other photographers who appear not to feel the need to self promote to the extent that you do. It absolutely ruins the shots you choose to share and detracts terribly from the experience of viewing them.

    If it is an attempt to discourage the right click save as merchants then I don’t see that it really has any purpose. If someone wants to purchase your images they will, however, by the same token, I don’t expect that those who would save your images would be inspired to buy one because of watermarking.

    Regards,

    kev35

    Kev,

    I think you know me well enough to be aware that I enjoy feedback and will happliy respond. I am not offended by what you have said, and to be fair, it’s not the first time that such comments have been made. I do appreciatte your positive comments about the images as well, but please let me explain my reasons for the watermarking and self promotion.

    Many of my images have comercial value, and I can not therefore take any risk of them appearing in publications or on someones website without my permission. I know this type of watermarking can distract from the image, but it’s a case of doing this or not posting the images on the net. I like to share the images on this site, and indeed on a few others. Generally most viewers appreciate just seeing the images, and don’t object to me promoting myself in this way. On non comercial images such as airshows, I do not watermark the images in the same way.

    As for the self promotion, I am a professional photographer who gets business from peaple viewing my work. My website is an important element of that. I am sorry if this is not ideal, but I feel it neccesary to protect and drive my photography. I do the same with my model portfolio work, which also gives me a significant return.

    Best regards

    Darren:)

    in reply to: Air to air in 2007 by Darren Harbar #518224
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    Chox

    4X – You lucky man!

    Love that shot – very crisp! πŸ™‚

    in reply to: A few Air 2 Air photos from 2007 #518229
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    Quite brilliant Gavin!

    in reply to: Air to air in 2007 by Darren Harbar #518430
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    WOW some great photos there, very nice indeed, if I had to pick a favourite if would the the second shot of the Gladiator but they are all very good indeed so well done:)

    I’m humbled Gavin to get such feedback from one who is a most talented air-to-air photographer in his own right.

    Thank you

    in reply to: Attention ML407 photographers #1314339
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    PM sent

    Darren Harbar – The Grace Spitfire official photographer

    http://www.ml407.co.uk

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation068.jpg

    in reply to: Mosquito being restored for Jerry Yagen(2005 Zombie) #1317691
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    This is the aircraft featured in the latest Flypast isn’t it?

    in reply to: Air to air in 2007 by Darren Harbar #519213
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback one and all – it’s a pleasure to share the images.

    The Guinot shot is over Rendcombe REF, it was taken on a very cold day back in February. I felt very sorry for Lucy, as she was very cold on the wing!

    As for this next year, there are a few projects already pencilled in, so I hope to bring you more images as the year progresses.

    As to my ultimate air to air – well after the Spitfire, which was always top of my list I guess the DH88 would be quite high, but the BBMF fleet would be one that I would love to shoot, as also the Red Arrows. I can but hope!!

    Prints of these images are available from the Grace Spitfire website (Spitfire images obviously) and the Shuttleworth shop sell prints of thier three airframes. We hope to offer a selection throughout the season.

    in reply to: Air to air in 2007 by Darren Harbar #519261
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    And three aircraft from Old Warden’s Shuttleworth Collection

    http://www.shuttleworth.org

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation054.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation064.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation061.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Gladiator025.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation028.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation033.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation133.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation131.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v698/darrenharbar/atoa%2007/Imagevintageaviation107.jpg

    in reply to: Hawker Demon Restoration at Skysports #1328819
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    Dunno what you mean Darren:eek:

    πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Hawker Demon Restoration at Skysports #1329816
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    I flew over Skysports workshops on 13th December and the Demon was outside…

    You need someone with Hawker biplane experiance to fly it……any ideas Ewan…….:D πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€

    in reply to: End of a Spitfire – for Mark 12 #1243915
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    Yes, PLEASE keep us informed, Mark!! BTW i’m beginning to wonder if you’re Peter Arnold!!

    It’s OK Mark12 – the boys are on there way round his house.:D

    Zimmers at the ready (private joke)! :diablo:

    in reply to: Nimrod AEW survivors? #1268279
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    I have loads of images of these airframes when they were at RAF Abingdon, including XV263 departing on the last ever AEW3 take off en route to Finningly. I will try to find some time to scan a few and post them on here.

    in reply to: G-CVIX Sea Vixen Status (merged) #1272086
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    But surely all it proves is how little fighter performance has improved when a Sea Vixen with a non combat pilot can be considered a serious adversary to a Typhoon!
    Still sounds odd, there are many NATO excercises, or they could even use RAF Hawks and Tonkas. Also plenty of Hunters about.
    Im wondering if the Sea Vixen can manouvre in ways a modern fighter can’t? I remember seeing ‘924 outshining a Tornado at Culdrose a couple of years ago

    Its more about encountering the unknown. You can fly against service types every day of the week but it all changes when faced with the unknown.

    in reply to: What's hidden in RAF Storage? #1274863
    darrenharbar
    Participant

    Does the RAF museum still store stuff at RAF Stafford?. I remember an artical in Flypast several years ago about racks of preserved aircraft parts, engines, propellors ect , plus at least two dismantled Spitfires and maybe others ?

    The Spitfires I think are the ones which were at RAF Cardington before they moved to RAF Wyton. I saw many interesting items in a hangar at Wyton about five/six years ago, I will dig out the old log and photos ?

    Stafford does indeed hold a number of RAFM treasures, including some Spitfires. The ex Benson gate guard is one, but not sure on the other 1 or 2 airframes. I believe they are held for potential swaps for filling gaps in the collection.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 720 total)