That’s an awful lot of tissues……..
……you haven’t had any teenagers flying in the back have you??? :p
We’ve got a few boat anchors in the store…..:diablo:
(Ian – Tamils flying the odd suicide mission around Colombo the night before last. They tried to take out the Air Force HQ flying Czech built Zlin Trainers packed with explosives…without success…they hit the tax office!)
Now I would pay £575 per share in a Zlin to take out my tax office!!
From a rough translation posted on “Touchdown News” it would appear that the Italian authorities were concerned that the aircraft could easily be recomissioned and put back into the sky with dangerous intentions…..
You could always ask RAF Mildenhall if it’s one of theirs……:diablo:
Yes, it was cut; I remember them stitching it all back together in the hangar that we shared with it when I was a volunteer on the non-flying B-17.
I was told by someone who has flown a Turbulent in the winter that you can hold your hand in the exhaust stream to warm it up!
Top shots, really brightens a cold day 😎
Sweet sounding engine…
Well, it did come from a very reputable place……;)
No problems for me either last year- I was there on business (Staggerwing C of A renewal) and very helpful security staff.
I would recommend anyone thinking of visiting to get advance permission from whoever you are going to see, and always keep a good lookout when driving on the taxiways. Also stop and look up and around at the runway threshold, even if you don’t see anything…just good practice really.
Other than Concorde and the Tu144 it (VC10)has never to my knowledge been beaten on speed by any other airliner.
Actually the Convair 990 had the edge; 615mph to the Vickie Ten’s 580.
On sheer beauty, the VC10 wins every time.
It doesn’t matter whether there was
a) A requirement for the aircraft, or
b) that they had already been subsidised
You can’t actually see that – what you can see is no orders from the Government of the country of origin – perceived as no confidence.
If the aircraft had already been paid for by way of subsidies, then a couple of examples should have been handed over and operated by HMG to show off our pride in the product.
As regards the VC10 in BOAC service, BA had a study done in later years that proved the VC10 to have been cheaper to operate in the long run due to having fewer corrosion issues than the Boeing 707.
Seems to fall into the same category as the Skyvan, Shorts 330, Islander, etc, etc…how on earth do the UK government expect British industry to sell those products to the world when MOD or other agencies won’t even buy them for their own use? I know that we did get the Islander after about 20 years, but an order for twenty or so at the time of the original launch might have said to the world “this is a British product and the British government have confidence in it”
You can bang on about ‘best product’ or ‘value for money’ as long as you like but the simple fact remains that Governments need to be seen to be championing their own industries in the same way as other nations do. Surely more cost effective in the long run to have bought some of the examples above than to allow the UK Aerospace industry to shrink so quickly, with all of the other costs associated with that.
(I thought all dogs were sniffers?…mine is 😀 ) Regards, Brian S.
They need training in what to sniff…..crotches and other dog’s bums don’t count 😀
That’s the beast! Cheers for that, a search on F-AZNR reveals that it does indeed still fly. Perhaps we could get it for Legends…..:cool:
Venom: de Havilland Venom & Sea Venom
by Professor David Watkins
The natural companion to his earlier book on the Vampire. Picked it up for a tenner at the DX October show -bargain!!