dark light

Billy Bishop

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 218 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2691947
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    Has anyone more information about the underground airbase in Bosnia which was destroyed when the serbs pulled out? It was built by the former Yugoslavia in the 70’s, and it was supposed to be the most impressive such facility in all of Europe. Supposedly it costed tens of billions of dollars to build, and bankrupted the country. A picture would be nice, or more information.

    Also, I don’t know if this is the right topic to bring up the big underground city in Yamantau mountain in Russia. Does it have facilities to support aircraft?

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2692372
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    How did this topic get so off topic? We were discussing underground airbases.

    Let’s put an argument to allied force once and for all. I have researched this topic so I think that I know enough about it and here are the facts:

    Two planes were shot down by the Serbs: 1 F-117, and 1 F-16. If any more planes were shot down there is no proof so there is no point in mentioning it. By Nato’s own admission, about 10-15 more planes were damaged by various types of missiles but not good enough to be brought down. Nato also admitted that a small number of UAV’s were also shot down (about 30), and these were videotaped and falsely claimed by Venik to be planes. No lives were lost. 2 AH-64 helicopters went down, but were probably not shot down by the Serbs. Serbian claims of hundreds of shot down planes was nothing more than propaganda put out by the Milosevic government, although from what I can tell this propaganda was aimed only at the Serbian population, it was never intended to convince anyone outside of Serbia, so I don’t see what you guys are so upset about. It is standard practice during wartime to motivate your population by exagerrating your successes while hiding your losses.

    As for the Serbs losses they lost 11 Mig-29’s (of which about half were not flyable anyways), and a similar number of Mig-21’s and G-4’s. They lost about 13 tanks and a few more APC’s and trucks and such. They also lost a good number of stationary targets of their integrated air defense network. Like the Serbs, Nato also exagerrated their kills, claiming hundreds of tanks and such.

    There… Now there is nothing more that anyone could possibly add to this story because I covered absolutely everything, so there is no reason to continue the argument. Are we agreed?

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2692578
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    But there were hundreds of planes. If a country sends fifty planes of one type, and one or two less come back, are people who are watching their return going to notice? What if they come from several different bases? Is each plane going to be returned to the same base it came from?

    in reply to: Anyone wants to buy some surplus aircraft:) #2692659
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    Which one is the Mig-23? I count 6 Mig-21’s, 16 J-22’s, 29 G-2’s (or J-21’s, is it possible to tell the difference)? Also, which Iraqi planes were brought to Yugoslavia? Mig-23, and what else? Mig-25 maybe?

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2692690
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    Is it totally inconceivable that some more aircraft than Nato admits were destroyed, but their wreckage landed somewhere outside the territory of Yugoslavia, like Bosnia or the sea, so the Yugoslavs could not show proof?

    in reply to: Lavi-2000 #2693780
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    What are the chances that Israel will design their own plane again in the future?

    in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2695292
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    I guess it makes sense then. I should’ve read the article slower, I skimmed thru it and for some reason I got the impression that these Su-27’s were new planes. Upgrading would greatly increase their capability at a very low cost, especially if they need to be overhauled anyways.

    in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2695636
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    Wouldn’t it make more sense for Russia to not buy any Su-27’s and instead save all the money they have so that they can buy more PAK-FA’s when they’re ready? Their current fleet of 3rd gen fighters should be good enough until then.

    in reply to: General Discussion #401205
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    I do not know anything about a law change in 2004. Ontario’s licencing laws and policies were completely revised only in 1994, so I don’t see why they would implement anything new so soon.

    in reply to: Ontario driving licences #1978638
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    I do not know anything about a law change in 2004. Ontario’s licencing laws and policies were completely revised only in 1994, so I don’t see why they would implement anything new so soon.

    in reply to: General Discussion #401206
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    I live in Ontario and here is what it says in my The Official Driver’s Handbook which I bought a few years ago when I was getting my licence:

    If you are a new resident of Ontario and have a valid driver’s licence from another province or country, you can use that licence for 60 days in Ontario. If you want to continue to drive after 60 days, you must get an Ontario driver’s licence.

    If you are a licensed driver from a country other than Canada, USA, or Japan, you must meet the Ontario driver medical requirements, pass a vision test and a test of your knowledge of the rules of the road and traffic signs. If you have acceptable proof of two or more years of driving experience, you may take the Level Two road test to earn full driving privileges. If you do not pass this road test, you will get a Level One (car or motorcycle) licence and may immediately schedule a Level One road test. A driver’s licence from another area is considered acceptable proof if it shows you have the driving experience required. If it does not, you will need to show documents that do. If you do not have acceptable proof of your driving experience, you will start at the beginning of Level One as a new driver.

    To sum it up, you do not have to take the written test, or the Level One road test, you go straight to the Level Two test, and if you pass it you get a real licence.

    I would recommend you schedule your road test as soon as possible because when I went they were booked about 3 months in advance.

    in reply to: Ontario driving licences #1978642
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    I live in Ontario and here is what it says in my The Official Driver’s Handbook which I bought a few years ago when I was getting my licence:

    If you are a new resident of Ontario and have a valid driver’s licence from another province or country, you can use that licence for 60 days in Ontario. If you want to continue to drive after 60 days, you must get an Ontario driver’s licence.

    If you are a licensed driver from a country other than Canada, USA, or Japan, you must meet the Ontario driver medical requirements, pass a vision test and a test of your knowledge of the rules of the road and traffic signs. If you have acceptable proof of two or more years of driving experience, you may take the Level Two road test to earn full driving privileges. If you do not pass this road test, you will get a Level One (car or motorcycle) licence and may immediately schedule a Level One road test. A driver’s licence from another area is considered acceptable proof if it shows you have the driving experience required. If it does not, you will need to show documents that do. If you do not have acceptable proof of your driving experience, you will start at the beginning of Level One as a new driver.

    To sum it up, you do not have to take the written test, or the Level One road test, you go straight to the Level Two test, and if you pass it you get a real licence.

    I would recommend you schedule your road test as soon as possible because when I went they were booked about 3 months in advance.

    in reply to: Mirage 2000-9 vs F-16 block 52, lets end it for all #2651741
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    What are the major differences between the 2000-5 and the 2000-9 and also is the 2000-9 in service anywhere?

    in reply to: Build your own Airforce, Airdefense, Training, Tactics #2656389
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    The fact is that nothing no matter how advanced can match sheer quantity. I would buy about 2000 of a cheap fighter jet, possibly the BVR-capable version of the F-7, whatever it’s called. They only cost around $5 million each. They have BVR, with HMS they are good dogfighters, and they carry PGM’s.

    in reply to: Serbian Air Force and Air Defence modernisation #2657698
    Billy Bishop
    Participant

    Bosnian Serb AF operates about 50 planes, mostly G-2’s and J-21’s. They also have a few G-4’s and a few J-22’s. Their best plane is the J-22, which is also their only plane which uses guided missiles (AA-2 Atoll and AGM-65 Maverick). Croatia also has a few G-4’s and during the Kosovo war the KLA hired Croatian pilots to paint their G-4’s in Yugoslav colors and then use them to attack refugee camps in northern Albania to try to bring Nato into a ground war.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 218 total)