dark light

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2166772
    paralay
    Participant

    A large air-to-air missile in the PAK FA and PAK DA.
    Missile SAM 9M100

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2167087
    paralay
    Participant

    I remind you, it is possible to start the RVV-DB only with AKU-610. Therefore, on the MiG-31BM, this rocket can be suspended only under the wing, under the fuselage can not be (there AKU-410)
    Still there is a long-range missile “product 810” for T-50

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2167689
    paralay
    Participant

    The range of the missile’s flight depends on the speed of the fighter. Perhaps 200 km allows the RVV-BD to reach the launch from the Su-35S, 300 km – MiG-31BM

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2177429
    paralay
    Participant

    Please excuse, but why is he referring to it as a car? Is that a translation error?

    Russians call the “machine” / “машина” a complex technical device. “Machine-building plant” / “Машино-строительный завод” can produce anything, machines, rockets, aircraft or cars. The translator defines this word as a “car”, in Russian it is synonyms. I believe the correct translation of the word “машина” is “craft”

    in reply to: What if we were all like India? #2179493
    paralay
    Participant

    the LMFS doesn’t exist

    Therefore, we must hurry! Start participating in the creation of the aircraft at the earliest stage

    in reply to: What if we were all like India? #2180233
    paralay
    Participant

    Indians should stop behaving like gypsies in the market. Take better, but in moderate quantities, from two suppliers from different countries. Today is the best option:
    heavy fighter – Su-30MKI
    marine fighter – MiG-29K / KUB
    light fighter – Grippen

    Tomorrow:
    heavy fighter – FGFA
    light / sea fighter – LMFS, unfortunately there are no other options yet

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2182663
    paralay
    Participant

    parallay-table, comparison based on published data
    Total potential: Rafal – 1, Eurofighter – 1.01, Grippen – 0.83

    The advertising statements of manufacturers of radio electronic equipment are taken into account. Ability to counter air defense

    Swiss report, a comparison based on real capabilities of the aircraft
    Phase I, total potential: Rafal – 1 (7.12), Eurofighter – 0.8 (5.71), Grippen – 0.68 (4.86)
    Phase II, total potential: Rafal – 1 (7.05), Eurofighter – 0.93 (6.55), Grippen – 0.76 (5.342)

    The actual capabilities of radio electronic equipment are taken into account. The results of the antiaircraft defense are not considered

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]258715[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2183278
    paralay
    Participant

    why don’t you look at the way actual air forces evaluate aircraft. I believe a few evaluations have been leaked, like the Swiss one. Maybe some older evaluations from decades ago are available.

    Show, it will be interesting to compare

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2183450
    paralay
    Participant

    you need to justify why these are even important variables to overall effectiveness

    If you have minimal skills in working with spreadsheets, then download the table from the link, you can get exhaustive answers to all your questions.
    We compare all the planes with the Su-27 (air-to-air) and with the Su-24 (air-to-ground), on the basis of this we compare the aircrafts to each other.
    This is not the most accurate way, but I have not seen other available methods of comparison

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2184321
    paralay
    Participant

    The total combat effectiveness of the F-35 is 40% higher

    http://s92025sm.beget.tech/paralay_tab.xls

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]258665[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2185755
    paralay
    Participant

    The original idea of the MiG-29M2 is a cheap / export version of the MiG-35, with simplified equipment

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2187556
    paralay
    Participant

    F-35A, fuel 8278 kg, range 2752 km, fuel consumption 8278 kg : 2752 km = 3 kg/km
    Rafale, fuel 4700 kg, range 2000 km, 4700 kg : 2000 km = 2.35 kg/km
    EF-2000, fuel 4996 kg, range 2000 km, fuel consumption 4996 kg : 2000 or 2100 km = 2.38 – 2.5 kg/km

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread 2. #2003160
    paralay
    Participant

    From 1993 to 1998, almost all “Seagulls” were written off. The last six cars are part of the 318th regiment of the Black Sea Fleet. About a dozen more sides are on storage at the aircraft factory in Taganrog and the Ostrov airport.

    http://aviation21.ru/samolyoty-amfibii-be-12-projdut-kardinalnuyu-modernizaciyu/

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2195321
    paralay
    Participant

    Why not? Pak Fa required a lot and it started during worst periods in Russia compared to now, we’re they are restarting production of Tu-160.

    Tu-160M2 – repetition of the passed. Hypersonic is new road

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2205859
    paralay
    Participant

    I do not understand, are you telling us that the F-22 is outdated comparing with Su-57? I think i understood bad….

    F-22 is an interceptor replacing the F-106. It in many ways repeats the ideology of the MiG-31, adding to it the small visibility and maneuverability of the fighter.
    The beginning of the production of the F-22 in 2001, the last F-22 was released in December 2011.
    The first serial Su-57 will take off in 2018, the oldest Raptor turns 17 years old. Over the years, the characteristics of on-board electronics have gone far ahead. The Su-57 is a multipurpose aircraft, the F-22 is an interceptor with a minimum of ground attack capabilities. Su-57 = F-22 + F-35 “in one bottle.” At the same time, he is better than the Raptor as a fighter and better than the Lightning as an attack aircraft, according to the total combat effectiveness.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]258411[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,325 total)