dark light

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2205871
    paralay
    Participant

    Regardless, they (Russia) will end up getting it (if it meets hype or not) to keep Sokol and Mikoyan alive.

    Hypersonic interceptor – too complex project. It will require huge money, a large-scale modernization of the Sokol plant and all related enterprises. I do not believe that this is possible with the current state of affairs in the country.
    A hypersonic interceptor on kerosene can reach a maximum speed of M = 5, a flight range of ~ 4000 km, with a maximum take-off weight of ~ 80,000 kg. This is the maximum achievable performance without hydrogen.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206015
    paralay
    Participant

    We are waiting for the hypersonic Aurora for twenty years 😉

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]258382[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206024
    paralay
    Participant

    As long as there is no hypersonic aircraft from the enemy (the US or China), the Russians do not need a hypersonic interceptor. History with the MiG-41 – PR

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206034
    paralay
    Participant

    Su-27M could become a good fighter with a new engine 2 x 13,600 kgf. Unfortunately, such an engine was not created. The maximum speed of the Su-27M with the AL-31F is 1900 km / h

    For what i know, the S-37 was not intended as the fulfillment of a precise operational requisite but as a technology demonstrator, not just about wings but about advanced fly-by-wire, TVC (on a Soloviev D-30…), bombs bay, rear looking radar and so on…

    It seems to me that the Russians never made special experimental planes. New aircraft remained in a single copy only as a result of problems (unsuccessful design, the collapse of the USSR, failure with the engine and the like)
    C-37 is a deck fighter for the aircraft carrier “Ulyanovsk.” Even the prototype has a folding wing. The serial fighter had to get:
    – rescue capsule
    – engine with controlled thrust vector P179-300 2 x 17500 kgf (flat nozzle) or AL-41F (izd.20) 2 x 20000 kgf
    – PESA “Bars” radar with rotary antenna
    – internal compartments for six air-to-air missiles
    and much more….

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]258381[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206204
    paralay
    Participant

    It would be an utterly obsolete concept today.. no reason to cry over spilled milk..

    I agree. The S-37 was designed as a counterweight to the F-22 and the F / A-18E / F sea fighter. After the appearance of the T-50, they are all hopelessly outdated.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2206911
    paralay
    Participant
    in reply to: Mig25PDS as escort fighter #2128923
    paralay
    Participant

    The range of the MiG-25P 600 – 800 km. Refueling in the air is not provided, there is no external tank. This range does not allow bombers to accompany
    There was an experimental scout MiG-25RB with refueling in the air, but this is another story

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]257484[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2131591
    paralay
    Participant

    10 billion euros – 11.9 billion dollars / 64 aircraft = 186 453 125 dollars per one
    F-35 costs the foreign buyer exactly twice as expensive …

    in reply to: Tu-160M2 White Swan (Белый лебедь) #2131832
    paralay
    Participant

    The M2 will be new build airframes, with an entirely new electronic/ avionics suite, and new build upgraded engines

    … and new weapons

    This aircraft corresponds to the updated Tu-160M1, with the only difference being that it has never flown yet

    in reply to: Tu-160M2 White Swan (Белый лебедь) #2131872
    paralay
    Participant

    This is not M2

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2132818
    paralay
    Participant

    In the patent, the missile is naturally distorted

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2132827
    paralay
    Participant

    http://www.findpatent.ru/patent/248/2489674.html

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]257132[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]257133[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2133118
    paralay
    Participant

    This plane, most likely, was made before 1991. Now it was equipped with equipment and engines. Tu-160M2 will be completely new

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2133989
    paralay
    Participant

    radome measuring:
    length 1.7 m
    width 1.2 m

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2134251
    paralay
    Participant

    length – 21.1 m
    scope of a wing – 13.0 m

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]256983[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,325 total)