(Gripen A had an RCS of 0,1m² in official verified documents released by FMV…

[ATTACH=CONFIG]251396[/ATTACH]

EF-2000 domestic motor + domestic missiles
Rafale domestic motor + domestic missiles
MiG-35 domestic motor + domestic missiles
Gripen foreign motor + foreign missiles

Findings “combat potential” built on the calculation, it not propaganda 😉

I painted Russian light fighter with a big cruise missile. Therefore, it was forced to move forward, “the nose landing gear” and the pilot cabin. To the length of the aircraft has not increased, he pushed back the radar.
American aircraft can be done on the classical scheme, with radar in the nose.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]251395[/ATTACH]

I think I’d make a bomb with at least the equivalent of a mk-83 in terms of firepower. For instance with a more boxy shape than the Mk-80s series. The bomb could be 3.6m long to fit in a bay designed for an AMRAAM.

F119 15876 kgs / 11825 kgs

thrust-to-weight: F-22 1.23, F-35 1.07
15876 kgs : 1.25 = 12700 kg – take-off weight norm.

12700 kg * 1.3 = 16700 kg – take-off weight max.

assembly density, maximum take-off weight F-22 519 kg / m3
volume 16700 kg : 519 kg/m3 = 32.3 m3
relative volume of a compartment of the weapon F-22 10.3%
volume of a compartment of the weapon 32.3 m3 * 10.3% : 100 = 3.33 m3 (F-22 – 6.73 m3)

3.33 m3 : 4 = 0.83 m3 or 0.2 m2 * 4.16 m – one weapon bay

No radar?
you need to be able to carry relatively large bombs.

Radar Antennas on the left and right of the cockpit.
fuselage volume does not allow to keep a bomb in the weapons bay. To increase the volume of the fuselage is required to increase the take-off weight.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]251394[/ATTACH]

Yes, it is not perfect.
You can check and suggest corrections 😉

http://www.paralay.com/paralay_tab.xls

No Information F-16E and F-10B
Line 209 – compared to the Su-27 in “dogfight”
Line 221 – compared to the Su-27 in the “long range fight”

Example: MiG-35 in close combat in 1.64 times better than Su-27

[ATTACH=CONFIG]251337[/ATTACH]

Just to translate a little better (no offense Paralay), what he is referring is real-time health monitoring, versus fixed schedule of maintenance. The same thing that brought the MiG-29SMT 40% cheaper flight hours.

Ok :applause:

However, I suspect you are referring to Su-30M2 (or earlier) Paralay? Not Su-30SM surely.

I was referring to the Su-30MKM