dark light
Airliner World
Combat Aircraft
AeroPlane
Flypast
Airforces
Aviation
Pcpilot
Air

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,325 total)
1 2 3 … 20 21 22 … 87 88 89
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 10, 2017 at 7:04 pm in reply to: Would you choose a MiG-35 over an Su-30 or Su-35? #2175208
    paralay
    Participant

    By the way, can the MiG-35 supercruise?

    Naturally no. Maximum speed was lower, what here supersonic cruising!

    February 10, 2017 at 2:40 pm in reply to: Would you choose a MiG-35 over an Su-30 or Su-35? #2175574
    paralay
    Participant

    I’ve no idea how you came up with these numbers.

    What is the problem? ask me

    February 10, 2017 at 2:37 pm in reply to: Would you choose a MiG-35 over an Su-30 or Su-35? #2175580
    paralay
    Participant

    Why the big gap on Su-30SM and Su-35s?
    2 vs 1 crew?

    Changed the principle of service, the Su-30 – “service under the rules of” (обслуживание по регламенту), Su-35s and MiG-35 – “condition maintenance” (обслуживание по техническому состоянию), perhaps this is the reason

    February 10, 2017 at 4:57 am in reply to: Would you choose a MiG-35 over an Su-30 or Su-35? #2176194
    paralay
    Participant

    The numbers for the Su-30 don’t make much sense.. obviously a different way of cost calculation

    MiG-29 – 15000 $ / hour flight, for the foreign customers – 30000 $ / hour flight

    February 9, 2017 at 6:18 pm in reply to: Would you choose a MiG-35 over an Su-30 or Su-35? #2177033
    paralay
    Participant

    Still have to be considered the operative cost however.

    Su-30 20000 – 25000 $ / hour flight
    Su-35S 10000 – 15000 $ / hour flight (presumably)
    MiG-35 7500 $ / hour flight

    February 9, 2017 at 4:41 pm in reply to: Would you choose a MiG-35 over an Su-30 or Su-35? #2177222
    paralay
    Participant

    Combat Potency, MiG-35 – AESA:
    dog fight: Su-30MKM (1.25), the Su-35 (1.93), the MiG-35 (1.64)
    long-range air combat: Su-30MKM (0.92), the Su-35S (1.9), the MiG-35 (1.44)

    attack ground targets: Su-30MKM (1.09), the Su-35S (1.53), the MiG-35 (1.27)
    Self-Defense: Su-30MKM (0.62), the Su-35S (0.81), the MiG-35 (0.77)

    Total capacity:
    Su-30MKM 1.25 * 0.92 * 1.09 * 0.62 = 0.78
    Su-35S 1.93 * 1.9 * 1.53 * 0.81 = 4.54
    MiG-35 1.64 * 1.44 * 1.27 * 0.77 = 2.31

    cost of (the domestic price / external price)
    Su-30MKM 50 million. $ / 80 million. $ / 1.6
    Su-35S 42 million. $ / 62.5 million. $ / 1.25
    MiG-35 31 million. $ / 50 million. $ / 1.0

    Efficiency / Cost:
    Su-30MKM 0.78 / 1.6 = 0.49
    MiG-35 2.31 / 1.0 = 2.31
    Su-35S 4.54 / 1.25 = 3.63

    Su-35s – the best choice

    February 7, 2017 at 5:39 pm in reply to: Multi role vs single mission aircraft #2180971
    paralay
    Participant

    Practice-criterion of truth

    1940 – 1945

    light fighters Як-1 (8734), Як-3 (4848), Як-7 (6399), Total 19981
    heavy fighter ЛаГГ-1 / ЛаГГ-3 (6598), Ла-5 (9920), Ла-9 (1882), Total 18400
    interceptors МиГ-1 (100), МиГ-3 (3178), Total 3278
    multirole fighter Як-9 – 16769

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251212[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]251214[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]251213[/ATTACH]

    February 6, 2017 at 7:28 pm in reply to: The Russians and Chinese have learned from the F-14 ? #2182225
    paralay
    Participant

    From the history of the Tu-160 …

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251174[/ATTACH]

    February 5, 2017 at 3:50 pm in reply to: The Russians and Chinese have learned from the F-14 ? #2184136
    paralay
    Participant

    I believe that the arrangement of the Su-27 close to the F-14, not F-15

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251136[/ATTACH]

    February 5, 2017 at 2:12 pm in reply to: The Russians and Chinese have learned from the F-14 ? #2184273
    paralay
    Participant

    The T10 really looks horrible in contrast to what became the Flanker

    Previously, it was worse…

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251134[/ATTACH]

    February 5, 2017 at 2:00 pm in reply to: The Russians and Chinese have learned from the F-14 ? #2184313
    paralay
    Participant

    What is that cannister mounted on that Flanker?

    Glowing bomb
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251132[/ATTACH]

    February 5, 2017 at 1:52 pm in reply to: The Russians and Chinese have learned from the F-14 ? #2184354
    paralay
    Participant

    There is a nice documentry on the Su-27 development out there you know.. people really should look it up.

    Yes I know. The first appearance of MLG “a la F-14” in 1973.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251131[/ATTACH]

    February 5, 2017 at 1:39 pm in reply to: The Russians and Chinese have learned from the F-14 ? #2184397
    paralay
    Participant

    In general, it does not seem right? 🙂
    There are other planes with a similar scheme of the chassis (with the exception of the MiG-29)?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251129[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]251130[/ATTACH]

    February 5, 2017 at 11:39 am in reply to: Why is the J79 30% heavier than the R-25? #2184551
    paralay
    Participant

    J-79 engine was captured in Vietnam. Lulka studied and made the engine AL-21F

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]251127[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]251133[/ATTACH]

    February 5, 2017 at 11:30 am in reply to: The Russians and Chinese have learned from the F-14 ? #2184584
    paralay
    Participant

    Su-27 Engineers experienced difficulties with the development of the chassis. “The main landing gear,” borrowed from the F-14. Air intakes – too.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,325 total)
1 2 3 … 20 21 22 … 87 88 89