Page 24 – Key Publishing

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 23 24 25 … 87 88 89 →

Author

Posts
January 13, 2017 at 4:59 am in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2201886

paralay
Participant

We know nothing about the capabilities and features of the aircraft.

It is known that
– It has the largest distance flight
– It has the largest flight speed (except for the MiG-31)
– Perfect aerodynamics, “unstable aircraft” can fly without a computer
– Maximum overload “huge fighter” more than 9 G
– 4 long-range missiles (400 km)

I do not like “1.44”, but I like the “1.42”

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250660[/ATTACH]

January 12, 2017 at 9:11 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2202094

paralay
Participant

What type 05B or type 05BM? This is a fantasy.
Aviation Plant “Sokol” produces MiG-31 stopped at the end of 1993 due to the crisis of the state.
In 1994, the plant is ready for production of the MiG 1.42
MiG 1.44 / 1.42, and S-37 fighter is a “big country”. Russia can not buy such aircraft. Russian potential only 40% of the USSR

The engine for S-37 – R179-300, 17500 kgs / 12000 kgs

January 10, 2017 at 5:33 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2202747

paralay
Participant

Limitation of M = 1.5 Many fly at supersonic speeds, including a weapons bay open. 337 flights until November 2009.

Nozzle product 54C has a very low visibility in the thermal and radar spectrum.

January 9, 2017 at 8:58 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2202985

paralay
Participant

It seems that the S 37 were built with the purpose of evaluating of new technologies and to develop the FBW system of this 5th Generation fighter that would be more aerodynamically unstable than the T 10 / Su 27, as well as it should reach speeds and altitudes from MiG 31 .

Maximum speed of the Su-47 is less than M = 2, since the air intakes are not regulated 😉

The Sukhoi had been trialed the Su 27 equipped with a flat nozzles engine with TVC 2D in 1989 , this test were made in order to collect data for the program of a 5th Generation fighter in which the S 37 would have been also part.

ЛЛ-УВ(ПС) – flat nozzle bomber “product 54C.” By the fifth generation fighter is irrelevant.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250594[/ATTACH]

January 8, 2017 at 7:35 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2203204

paralay
Participant

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250572[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]250592[/ATTACH]

January 7, 2017 at 4:39 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2203593

paralay
Participant

If you take a look at any photo of the Su-47 there are no signs of folding wing mechanism.

-You See a gopher?
– No
– And I do not see. But it’s there … :very_drunk:

January 7, 2017 at 4:30 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2203594

paralay
Participant

There is almost zero evidence to suggest that the S-47 has folding wings. Why would it need folding wings?

I repeat once again, the Su-47 – Marine fighter-interceptor. The Air Forces of the USSR bought MiG-35 (1.42). Mikhail Simonov suggested project fighter for fleet to the aircraft carrier Ulyanovsk pr.1143.7

January 7, 2017 at 4:24 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2203599

paralay
Participant

I thought it was the S 37? (NOT 47) – later changed to Su-47 to avoid confusion with the Su-37 (Bort 711 TVC Su-35). Ken

There is no fighter “Su-35” and “Su-37”. There are twelve Su-27M (T10M-1 … T10M-12)

http://www.paralay.com/su27m/su27m.html

Fighter project FSW at various times called differently.
S-32 – the first flight of the plan in 1992
S-37 – It made its first flight in 1997
Su-47 – informal name

January 7, 2017 at 10:18 am in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2203692

paralay
Participant

Company Sukhoi + MiG = “Охотник / Hunter,” take-off weight of 20 tons, attack, the first flight of 2018. Analogue of the X-47B
Company Irkut aviation plant + Yak = “Прорыв / Breakthrough” (Yak-133), take-off weight of 10 tons, attack, first flight in September 2016.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250539[/ATTACH]

Company “Simonov” + Kazan aviation plant = “Альтаир / Altair”, take-off weight of 5 tons, crashed, scout

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250540[/ATTACH]

Company Myasischev + TsAGI = “Обзор-1 / Review-1”, first flight 2017, analogue Global Hawk

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250541[/ATTACH]

Company “Kronstadt” = …, take-off weight of 1.2 tons, scout / attack. Analogue Predator

January 7, 2017 at 7:17 am in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2203726

paralay
Participant

Eyewitnesses claim that the only example of the Su-47 has a folding wing.

January 6, 2017 at 8:18 pm in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2204083

paralay
Participant

The failed F-35 fighter-jet program can’t be fixed — it’s time to turn the page.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443612/f-35-donald-trump-should-cancel-failed-f-35-fighter-jet-program

January 6, 2017 at 6:34 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2204113

paralay
Participant

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250528[/ATTACH]

January 6, 2017 at 2:54 pm in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2204201

paralay
Participant

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250517[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]250520[/ATTACH]

Su-47 has a folding wing (Animated Picture)

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250518[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]250519[/ATTACH]

January 5, 2017 at 5:30 pm in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2204628

paralay
Participant

This nozzle bomber “product 54C”

[ATTACH=CONFIG]250501[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]250502[/ATTACH]

January 4, 2017 at 11:26 am in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2205201

paralay
Participant

Heal America from stupidity!

https://www.thenation.com/article/the-perils-of-russophobia/
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 23 24 25 … 87 88 89 →