Page 32 – Key Publishing

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 31 32 33 … 87 88 89 →

Author

Posts
September 2, 2016 at 6:43 pm in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2151346

paralay
Participant

Шурик, хватит сосать палец.))

2200 km * 0.35 = 770 km
Since when did “radius of action” is half the distance of the flight?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]247941[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]247942[/ATTACH]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_F/A-18E/F_Super_Hornet

September 2, 2016 at 4:43 pm in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2151457

paralay
Participant

F-35A range of flight 1850 – 2100 km, radius 35% range 650 – 735 km
Su-30MKM range of flight 3000 km, radius 1050 km

August 30, 2016 at 9:55 pm in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2152905

paralay
Participant

Because of these characteristics it is not publicly available 😉

August 30, 2016 at 7:27 pm in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153023

paralay
Participant

Gentlemen, I’m not going to argue! Each of us in their rights. And the truth will be known testers. At the landfill, or in a real war.
By the way, the characteristics of the Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen and MiG-35 should be known to the Air Force in India.

August 30, 2016 at 6:54 pm in reply to: Long Range Bombers: Can they carry Air-to-Air missiles internally ? #2153071

paralay
Participant

Any reason why the Russia Air Force did not opt for air-to-air missiles in their bombers like Tu-160, Tu 95 or Tu 22?

On board the bombers are very powerful systems of electronic warfare. Sometimes fighter radar will not be able to attack a bomber

[ATTACH=CONFIG]247886[/ATTACH]

August 30, 2016 at 6:48 pm in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153078

paralay
Participant

That is a bit too vague to say the least IHMO

What you need to complicate? We are not begging for money from Congress!
The radar sees the goal in front, he is interested in the average value of this angle. And all the rest can be left to specialists in radar systems.

… ( done by Chinese and Ukraine scientists) and manufacturers claims

Ukrainian scientists? Who is it?

August 30, 2016 at 5:44 pm in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153144

paralay
Participant

i assume man-machine interface is not accounted for at all ?
every western pilot reporting on the matter starting from west german pilots claim flying Mig-29 is hard work,
leaving little capacity left for combat

Fighter WWII La-5 had a complex engine management system. Fw 190 greatly facilitates the work of the pilot with automatic systems. However the war ended in Berlin …

August 30, 2016 at 5:38 pm in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153170

paralay
Participant

Where do you get Min and Max RCS for Rafale/Typhoon/Gripen… or F-22 for example ?

There are official data for certain types of aircraft. For example the Su-27, the minimum RCS – 5 m2, the maximum RCS – 15 m2.
Russian experts (Lagarkov, Poghosyan and others) claim that the EPR of F-22 – 0.3 m2. This is the minimum value for a modern fighter.
Formulas in line 94 and 95 give the same value.

http://vivovoco.astronet.ru/VV/JOURNAL/VRAN/03_10/STELLS.HTM

August 30, 2016 at 5:17 pm in reply to: Long Range Bombers: Can they carry Air-to-Air missiles internally ? #2153196

paralay
Participant

Launcher missiles “air-to-air” for the bomber Sukhoi “product 54S”

[ATTACH=CONFIG]247879[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]247880[/ATTACH]

http://www.paralay.com/t60.html

August 30, 2016 at 10:32 am in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153585

paralay
Participant

Only objective technical data

August 30, 2016 at 10:01 am in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153597

paralay
Participant

The task – to compare the aircraft on the basis of the available data. characteristics that can not get officially calculated . Even these simple methods allow to obtain satisfactory results.

August 30, 2016 at 8:43 am in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153632

paralay
Participant

Table thousands of numbers , which confuses you ?

August 30, 2016 at 8:18 am in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153647

paralay
Participant

random ? in which place?

August 30, 2016 at 6:04 am in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2153696

paralay
Participant

I conclude on the basis of facts.
Line 209: advantage in dog fight
Line 221: advantage ranged

All planes are compared with the Su-27. In the cells of the formula. As the calculation is carried out can be found by downloading the table.

MiG-29M best in dog fight – 1.31.
Rafal best ranged – 1.30

[ATTACH=CONFIG]247872[/ATTACH]

http://www.paralay.com/paralay_tab.xls

August 29, 2016 at 6:37 pm in reply to: Gripen , Typhoon , Rafale vs F-15C , F-16C ,F-15E , Su-27 , Mig-29 #2154141

paralay
Participant

Rafale and Typhoon combat capabilities correspond to the MiG-29M in 1986

[ATTACH=CONFIG]247865[/ATTACH]
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 31 32 33 … 87 88 89 →