dark light

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2196033
    paralay
    Participant

    Twelve bombs – it is a joke. Maximum takeoff weight of C-37 less than forty tons 🙂

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2196070
    paralay
    Participant

    Off topic, but it’s no wonder Su-47 never bore fruit with it’s tiny internal compartment…

    The inner compartment of the Su-47 – 4 missile R-77 and 2 R-73.
    In the picture a special compartment for the test under the program PAK FA

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244223[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]244224[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The indefensible Baltic states. #2198776
    paralay
    Participant

    And the idea that the USA “ocupied” Western Europe are borderline ridiculous.

    If on the territory of an independent state for decades are foreign troops – this military seizure. People just used to this state of affairs. They stopped to call a spade a spade.
    US military bases in Europe not to defend against Russia. European Defence – an illusion for the electorate.
    They have a different purpose. After a nuclear exchange the Americans planted the marines on the coast of Europe.
    Russian troops have to get up on the Atlantic coast, to stop them. This requires the US military bases abroad.

    You can not doubt the one.
    If Russia and China will disappear, will disappear all countries except the United States. Make no mistake, after a year or two will be one large United States.
    US “embarrassed” because there are Russia and China. Russia does not do this, because there are US.
    The same is true for China.

    in reply to: The indefensible Baltic states. #2198914
    paralay
    Participant

    What is your opinion of Russian foreign policy? Can you explain an increase in activity where more Russian aircraft are being intercepted in Europe? I ask because you are based in Russia. How do you suggest that the current situation of tension can be calmed?

    I observe the situation on the Russian side.
    The insolence of the US and NATO “knows no bounds”. State of Russia – 1000 years, its “childhood diseases” is over. Now an adult, experienced “man” (40 – 45 years).
    USA – 200 years This is a young man of 18 – 25 years. He “does not know what he was doing.” He knows only one word – “I want to”. He thinks only of himself and his own interests.
    The United States in 1945 – 1991 years repeatedly provoked the Soviet Union. Only the the common sense of the Soviet Union saved the world from disaster.

    US occupied Europe, Japan and other places. They have placed military bases around the world. What for?
    They used to call an enemy of communism. Today, Russia is not communist. In Russia, capitalism, as in the US.
    What is the problem?

    Approximation of NATO to Russia’s borders. “Orange Revolution” in the former Soviet Union – the result of CIA activities. Financing of a “fifth column” in Russia.
    All this creates a danger to the country’s territorial integrity and its statehood. What is surprising is that Russia has decided to defend themselves?

    Motives operations in Syria, I do not understand. I guess I look for them in mysticism.

    If Turkey will dare again “prick Bear”, then it will lose control of the Black Sea Straits and part of its territory. In any case, the period of tension (or war) will end in 2018.

    in reply to: The indefensible Baltic states. #2199114
    paralay
    Participant

    Guys, why so much garbage in your heads? SNN? BBS? Or from the source – the US State Department?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2158458
    paralay
    Participant

    AKU-170 (R-77) !!!

    in reply to: If you could only choose one Flanker type.. #2168058
    paralay
    Participant

    The best option: Heavy multipurpose fighter Su-30 fighter, lightweight C-56, in a ratio of 1: 2

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]241190[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]241191[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Airwar in the 80s WP vs NATO #2196426
    paralay
    Participant

    The economic potential opponents:
    The Third Reich, the area 3,277,000 km2 (1941), the population of 283 million people (1941)
    The Soviet Union, the territory of 22,402,200 km2 (1991), the population of 196,716 million people. (June 1941)
    The total potential of 4.75 in favor of the USSR.
    To realize the potential of the Soviet Union it took 700 days from the start of the war, and another 800 days to complete victory.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2164280
    paralay
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]238844[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]238845[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2165207
    paralay
    Participant

    And cross-section to scale.

    Scale – correct

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]238823[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2165307
    paralay
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]238820[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2182446
    paralay
    Participant

    So is that the Mach 4+ aircraft or something different?

    or something different 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2182740
    paralay
    Participant

    And it still has a gun.:D

    The last argument of Kings 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2182929
    paralay
    Participant

    Isn’t the MiG-41 supposed to replace the MiG-31?

    Presumably the MiG-41 – the modern version of a hypersonic project MiG 301 / 321. By 2028, all of the MiG-31 will be replaced by promising aviation complex of distant interception (PAK DP)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]237482[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: 5th gen light fighter. is it practical? #2183609
    paralay
    Participant

    The relative volume of modern fighter aircraft weapons bay 10 – 13% of the volume of the airframe of the aircraft. The normal combat load: two short-range missiles and two medium-range missiles. The required amount of weapons bay ~ 3 m2. The minimum amount of the plane armed with four missiles: 3 m2: 0.10 or 0.13 = 23 or 30 m3. Maximum take-off weight of the aircraft 23 m3 or 30 m3* 500 m3 kg / m3 = 11500 kg or 15000 kg. I think that 15 tons – probably

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 1,325 total)