Very interesting to see how behaves propeller at supersonic speeds?
There is a solution – 3D printing 😉
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235382[/ATTACH]
Minikite from paralay
Fighter for the small but proud Finland.
This aircraft sum of two completely different fighter! How to settle two bears in one den?
First – turboprop aircraft type “Super Tucano”, with a maximum speed of 500 – 600 km / h and a long duration flight.
The second – a rocket, with a maximum speed of 2,500 km / h (further accelerate impossible, “thermal barrier”)
Fighter takes off from Rovaniemi. Climbs 7000 – 8000 meters and a cruising speed of 500 – 600 km / h. The maximum flight time of about three hours. On board radar (weighing about 50 – 70 kg) two AIM-9 missiles, 30 mm cannon.
Ground services discovered enemy bomber (Mach 0.9, the height of 10,000 meters)
Minikite pilot accelerated to a speed of 600 – 700 km / h, turn the wing to the maximum sweep. Includes accelerator and begins pursuit of the enemy.
Propellers turn into the wind vane and disconnected from the engine. Speed increases rapidly up to 2500 km / h. Radar captures the target at a distance of 50 km (the goal one minute flight), the pilot let both missiles and turns away.
The speed was slowly reduced to 700 km / h, the clutch is switched from the engine propeller, wing sweep to 0 degrees. Planting.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235381[/ATTACH] 
The commander of the Russian Air Force P.S.Deynekin, who ordered the new trainer aircraft, before flying on multi-engine bombers. He ordered spurned all single-engine aircraft (MiG-23, MiG-27 and Su-17). He said that the new Russian military aircraft should be multiengine. Therefore, coach S-54 and S-56 fighter did not receive support. “Bomber mafia” triumphed 🙂
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235380[/ATTACH]
Russian proverb: “There is no prophet in his own country.” This means that at home the inventor will not be rewarded.
The company offers single-engine fighter with radar based on the Yak-130
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235358[/ATTACH]
That is, your idea is very easy fighter – is correct. Now it needs to be carefully formulated and solved :applause:
Finnish territory at different times belonged to the Swedes and Russian. Both may have the desire to return the land back.
I do not understand why the Russian submarine climb in Swedish shallow water? What’s the point? Russian proverb: “Do not be caught – not a thief” 😉
Previously, there came the English diesel submarine, that’s a fact.
Finland can not buy Swedish fighter. 201 JAS-39 can be balanced by purchasing 151 Su-30MKI or 114 MiG-35 or 218 Yak-130 (+radar).
Finnish budget allows only contain 45 MiG-35 or 118 Yak-130. With the same exertion as it is now possible, to buy 77 MiG-35, but it’s wasteful.
Total weight of Swedish Air Force 201 JAS-39 * 12.473 ton = 2,507 tons (138%)
Total weight of the Finnish Air Force 61 F-18 * 23.542 tons + 65 Hawk * 5.7 ton = 1,807 tons (100%)
The average efficiency of the F-18C in a dogfight – 0,995, JAS-39 – 0.875. Hawk ~ 0.5
obtain
Finland 61 F-18C * 0.995 + 65 Hawk * 0.5 = 93.195 (100%)
Sweden 201 JAS-39 * 0.875 = 175.875 (189%)
Conclusion: The Finnish Air Force for 25% more powerful than it can afford 🙂
Military potential
Russia, 17,125,187 km² * 146,270,033 people = 2504901667621171 (1358%)
Sweden, 449,964 km² * 9,723,809 people. = 4375363992876 (237%)
Finland, 338 430.53 km² * 5,450,614 = 1844654184845.42 (100%)
Suggest that the role of the enemy assign Sweden, it is real. 🙂
Since Finland is not a member of NATO, Russia is not an enemy of Finland. The country can be-Occupied Norway, Sweden or Russia. Confrontation with the Russian meaningless, soldiers are in different weight categories.
Swedish Air Force 201 JAS-39. Norwegian Air Force 57 F-16
Tell me about the tactics of the rocket plane. Who is the enemy?
This is highly teorethical…and the wood composite I have planned to use may not withstand the heat at 65 km ( 380 degs C ) at M3.1.
Straight wing + supersonic speed = nosedive 😉
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235330[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]235331[/ATTACH]
Aviation postapocalypse: http://paralay.iboards.ru/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3060&p=451893#p451893 🙂
No, I’m not a professional designer of aircraft. But I love doing it. In 1988 and 1991 – 1993, I worked at an aircraft plant “Sokol”, in the production of the MiG-31.
Evaluation RCS: 0.9 – 1.86 m2 minimum, 3 – 4 m2 maximum
Maximum takeoff weight 3300 – 3600 kg
Maximum combat load of 804 kg
Normal combat load of 450 kg
Wing loading of 180 kg / m2
The load on the power of 2.77 kg / hp.
Takeoff thrust-0.72 (maximum takeoff weight)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235324[/ATTACH]
Unknown. Presumably the Russian aviation equipment worth 10,000 dollars / kg. Weight optical radar station 50 – 70 kg, while the price of 50 kg * $ 10,000 / kg = 500,000 USD.