Page 40 – Key Publishing

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 … 87 88 89 →

Author

Posts
February 14, 2015 at 1:28 pm in reply to: Size of the new 5th gen fighters…too big !? #2222707

paralay
Participant

What is the “pod” system a top ?

OLS-UEM, optical-location station forward looking field of view +/- 90 in azimuth and -15 / + 60 degrees. elevation. As part of IR, TV and laser channel. Detection range of air targets in the rear hemisphere 45 km, 15 km front.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]235320[/ATTACH]

February 14, 2015 at 6:01 am in reply to: Size of the new 5th gen fighters…too big !? #2222766

paralay
Participant

Ejection seat:
SKS-94M2 (speed 70 – 400 km / h, 28 kg weight)
KSS-42-4 (speed 0 – 850 km / h, 68 kg weight)
K-36L 3,5YA (speed 0 – 1,050 km / h, 86 kg weight)

February 14, 2015 at 5:25 am in reply to: Size of the new 5th gen fighters…too big !? #2222767

paralay
Participant

Need a multi-purpose aircraft, such was the Yak-9. I take as a basis the three aircraft: the Il-2 (protected pilot), Vought XF5U-1 (Supermaneuverability), english project SABA (expressway). Fighter uses the “Russian component” TVD-1500 gun GSH-301, R-73 and 9M100, bombs FAB-250 and FAB-500, launcher B-8M1.
Maximum combat load: 800 – 1000 kg (GS-301 and cartridges, 2 B-8M1)
Then the maximum take-off weight of 1000 kg: 0.26 = 3850 kg

February 13, 2015 at 9:54 pm in reply to: Size of the new 5th gen fighters…too big !? #2222804

paralay
Participant

🙂

[ATTACH=CONFIG]235317[/ATTACH]

February 13, 2015 at 8:28 pm in reply to: PAK-FA complement ? #2222824

paralay
Participant

Aft fuselage, where engines (gray). Very similar to the tail of the MiG 1.44, the appearance is not very different

[ATTACH=CONFIG]235312[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]235313[/ATTACH]

February 11, 2015 at 7:42 pm in reply to: PAK-FA complement ? #2223599

paralay
Participant

It is high time to do it. But Russian secrecy – senseless and merciless! 🙂

February 11, 2015 at 5:07 pm in reply to: PAK-FA complement ? #2223724

paralay
Participant

In 1994 were built two of the rear fuselage MiG 1.42
The prototype of the MiG 1.44, collecting dust in Zhukovsky

February 11, 2015 at 4:50 am in reply to: PAK-FA complement ? #2223974

paralay
Participant

On your avatar MiG 1.42: http://paralay.com/mfi.html

February 10, 2015 at 4:45 pm in reply to: PAK-FA complement ? #2224125

paralay
Participant

This project is the end of the eighties. Easy front-line fighter (Лёгкий фронтовой истребитель, ЛФИ), drawing – speculation.
http://paralay.com/lfi_mig.html

January 31, 2015 at 10:31 pm in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227331

paralay
Participant

The USSR made a buffer zone of Eastern Europe, and released her without blood. US had occupied the entire planet and dictate its will. Now Europe “dancing to the American tune,” imposes sanctions to their own detriment. What will happen when US troops withdraw from Europe? I will say with confidence, ONET not go without blood.
By the way, do not confuse Russia and the USSR. Russia – a thousand years, Soviet Union – 70 years.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]234994[/ATTACH]

January 31, 2015 at 4:15 pm in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227584

paralay
Participant

Not to be afraid of “Russian Bear”, it is necessary to leave him alone, and do not poke a stick. (this is true in 98% of cases). His “bloodlust” – fudge your TV

January 31, 2015 at 9:19 am in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227733

paralay
Participant

Paralay we have a navy too….and my MINIKITE can operate from a very small carrier…will you surrender to us …:) ?!

Русские не сдаются! (Russian do not surrender!) :Р

January 31, 2015 at 5:53 am in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227763

paralay
Participant

Ignorance…
Remind us all again why the Berlin wall was built. Was it to keep the West out? :confused:

To remind you which country belonged Berlin after World War II? Why did the British and Americans did not leave Berlin? They wanted a new war?

January 31, 2015 at 5:46 am in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227769

paralay
Participant

Would you feel comfortable if finns annexed the Vyborg and Petsamo regions back to Finland ( lost in WW II ) ? :confused:

I in any case I will feel comfortable. I will not mind if Finland will cease to be a backwater of Europe, and wants to be part of a great country with its thousand-year history, aviation, army and navy 🙂

[ATTACH=CONFIG]234975[/ATTACH]

January 30, 2015 at 10:08 pm in reply to: Russian near incursions #2227854

paralay
Participant

So do you think it is ok for Russia to annex Crimea ?

It is normal that Bundesrepublik Deutschland to annex Deutsche Demokratische Republik? 🙂
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 39 40 41 … 87 88 89 →