Damn, you guys need to seriously invest in better tank technology.:stupid:
But it’s actually a pretty ingenious make-shift solution.
Ukraine sold out the entire army. No money – all stolen : Аплодисменты:
More on the Il-76 shot down.
Shot down another Su-25. The pilot was captured.
In Lugansk airport burned AN-26. It was hit with automatic weapons, but he successfully landed.
http://russian.rt.com/article/36352
Another lie. Pictured ukraniskie military in Mariupol.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]229187[/ATTACH]
Journalists… :rolleyes:
No. This information war
This information is outdated. Or you saw the F-22 with four external fuel tanks?
F-22:
MTOW: 38,000 kg
Empty: 19,700 kg
Total load: 18,300 kg
F-22: MTOW: 33906 kg (19660 (empty) +100 (pilot) + 9330 (fuel) + 3700 (external tank) + 1116 (missile) = 33906 kg)
F-22 no can carry four external fuel tank – redesigned wing. Therefore, take-off weight of 38 tons unreachable
I do not want to arrange here retellings of “talking heads” of the TV. It is important that neither the Russian aviation, nor the Russian government, to this subject are not involved
Title of the topic – not correct. Russia has no relation to the massacre
In either case you have to admire the bravery of the second helicopter for immediately returning to the fight.
These flying villains waiting Nürnberg-II
This rear cabin MiG-31B
UVKU-50U, height 200 mm, weight 117 kg, left and right, respectively UVKU interchangeable installation position and mounting and docking elektrorazemov with the object. Light load – izd.180, 180PD, 270, 181C and K047., Heavy load – ed 65 D7USHK and 810 (long-range missile) 🙂
RVV-BD – Su-35 and MiG-31BM, izd.810 – PAK FA
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227980[/ATTACH]
Now compartment is located only two missiles, in the future may accommodate three izd.180
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227981[/ATTACH]
Fair enough. I can’t give you better data, because first it would be necessary to find out what kind of engine weight the calculation scheme requires (dry? installed? what definition of dry or installed *exactly*?) and then we’d need to get weight figures according to that standard for the actual engines in question. Realistically speaking, that’s probably not going to be possible….
This “dry” weight of the engine. Unfortunately, the language barrier prevents us to discuss this topic in detail
Ok…
Trident, I do not pretend to “ultimate truth”. Can you substitute your data table and show it to us 😉
9.21 m2 (scale 1:100), Scale is measured not only by the wing span, but also in other parts
[ATTACH=CONFIG]227917[/ATTACH]