Do you mean more like an FOD screen?

Yes. Unfortunately translator not explain abriviatura value, better to write full 😉

Let us once again collapsed topic 😎

[ATTACH=CONFIG]224680[/ATTACH]

But anyways, there is a little bit more to radar returns than 4 fudge factors. That approach is little more than a guess to be honest.

Notable findings coincide … 😉

From what direction and at what radar wavelength?

Average value taken for the calculation. In the same scale RCS min F-22 – 0.3 m2, RCS min T-50 – 0.5 m2

http://paralay.com/paralay_tab.xls

Line 91 and 92

According to Mr. Lagarkov and Mr. Pogosyan, the average RCS maneuverable fighter can not be below 0.3 square meters 😉

Well my google fu seems to be weak today. Can you provide a link?
thanks

“У самолета F-22 (американский истребитель пятого поколения – ИФ-АВН) – 0.3-0.4 кв.м. У нас аналогичные требования к заметности”, – сказал А.Давиденко.

“The plane F-22 (American fighter of the fifth generation – IF-AVN) – 0.3-0.4 sq.m. We have similar requirements for visibility,” – said A.Davidenko.

http://paralay.com/pakfa/pakfa.html

Технический результат, на достижение которого направлено изобретение, заключается в снижении величины РЛ-заметности самолета до средней величины порядка 0,1-1 м2.

Technical result, The aim of the invention is to reduce the magnitude of radar visibility of the aircraft to an average of about 0.1-1 m2.

http://www.findpatent.ru/patent/250/2502643.html

By the way, Paralay, could you make a drawing like this comparing all 5th generation fighters in it? F-22, F-35, J-20, J-21, PAK-FA, Mig-1.44, Su-47 and YF-23..?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]223857[/ATTACH]

I am asking Mr. Paralay very nicely 🙂