I also did a flying model. But I have a bad practice, but good theoretician

Look at the way this problem is solved, “adult uncle” 🙂
[ATTACH=CONFIG]215507[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]215508[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]215509[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]215510[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]215511[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]215512[/ATTACH]

Russian are very lazy, they will not engage in the embodiment of the idea, if it is not done opponents. When the Americans and the Chinese have made a breakthrough, Russian heroically to catch up and overtake 😀

Now it is very risky to build a high-tech bomber. Since then, was built Tu-160, was 32 ​​years old. “Sukhoy” was trying to make a new bomber in the nineties. His reworked more than four times, but it never flight.
I believe that the best solution – the construction of multipurpose supersonic aircraft weighing 60 tons. It will replace the MiG-31 and Tu-22M3, will be enough. Then PAK DA would not be necessary.

http://paralay.com/stat/MFP2.pdf

Russian does not need a supersonic bomber. Russia does not need to attack aircraft, but need a plane for the defense: the interceptor, anti-submarine aircraft, tanker, flying anti-aircraft missile system. These tasks are successfully solving subsonic, stealth, long-range aircraft.
My opinion of these tasks should instruct civil aircraft, but the military thinks otherwise.

I guess the yellow highlighted – absorbs radio coverage…

I wonder if this is going to be Pak-Fa as a interceptor or are they going for a totally new bird…

😎

Not true, from min 2:31, STO and rolling landing (some very strange on normal Harrier carrier operations)

Yes, I was wrong. During one of the trips, the Yak-38 flew 480 times vertically and horizontally 120 times.

Not true. Levkov has started L-1 hovercraft tests just in 1934.

Grisha, and how it was in the hours and minutes? 😀