Page 6 – Key Publishing

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 5 6 7 … 87 88 89 →

Author

Posts
March 3, 2019 at 9:25 am in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2112415

paralay
Participant

India bought about 200 KAB-1500

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”5103281_original.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3854193}[/ATTACH]

February 22, 2019 at 2:14 pm in reply to: Could a propeller driven aeroplane still be lethal in aerial combat today ? #2115027

paralay
Participant

In my opinion, the best option of the “direct aviation support” apparatus would be a high-speed helicopter or convertiplane. The maximum speed of 500 – 700 km / h and vertical takeoff and landing. Then plane a horizontal takeoff and landing, propeller, will be interesting only as a training aircraft.

My favorite layout of a fighter from the future for the Second World War 🙂

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”paralay_project.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3852488}[/ATTACH]

February 20, 2019 at 4:02 am in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2115649

paralay
Participant

In the table, the comparison takes place according to 43 parameters, the change of several of them slightly changes the result. For example, I adjusted the dimensions, the “dog fight” changed from 1.158 to 1.168, less than 1%.
A comparison of MiG-29S, MiG-29M and F / A-18C / D made by MiG has been published. It matches the results in the table.

February 19, 2019 at 5:42 pm in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2115729

paralay
Participant

The characteristics of the radar is only one of the factors affecting the outcome of the air battle. And this factor is not the most significant. I believe that the total combat effectiveness will change slightly

February 19, 2019 at 3:36 pm in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2115784

paralay
Participant

In this case, the characteristics of FC-1 in Wikipedia and other sources are false. I put the picture of the RD-33, these dimensions are probably closer to the truth

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”10&16&17.JPG”,”data-attachmentid”:3851888}[/ATTACH]

February 19, 2019 at 3:47 am in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2115897

paralay
Participant

There´s no public available data to make a meaningful comparison beyond something like “they should be roughly on par”.

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”srawni_1.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3851806}[/ATTACH]

February 18, 2019 at 6:15 pm in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2116031

paralay
Participant

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”medium”,”data-attachmentid”:3851718}[/ATTACH][ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”medium”,”data-attachmentid”:3851719}[/ATTACH]

February 8, 2019 at 8:07 am in reply to: MiG-31 Thread #2117969

paralay
Participant

Flight time of the MiG-31 at supersonic cruising speed M = 2.35 fifteen minutes

February 8, 2019 at 3:18 am in reply to: MiG-31 Thread #2117975

paralay
Participant

The maximum target speed is 2500 km / h, which means that the speed of the P-73 is above this value.

Restrictions on the launch conditions of guided missiles (Su-27, points 5,6,7,8)
H = 15000 – 18000 m на V= 650 km/h (до M = 2,35) H < 15000 m на V= 300 – 1100 km/h (до M = 2,2)

http://aviakos.ucoz.ru/dok/pdf/bp_avia/su-27.pdf

February 7, 2019 at 7:20 pm in reply to: MiG-31 Thread #2118098

paralay
Participant

In that case, why does he need a steel structure?
The maximum speed of 3000 km / h, M = 2.83
Cruising speed is 2500 km / h, M = 2.35 (up to 15 minutes)

February 7, 2019 at 4:04 pm in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2118125

paralay
Participant

Paralay, from which magazine was it translated from?

舰载武器，Shipborne Weapons

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”file.php?id=21402&mode=view.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3850006}[/ATTACH]

February 7, 2019 at 3:41 pm in reply to: MiG-31 Thread #2118137

paralay
Participant

The MiG-31 is capable of developing a speed of 3000 km / h with four R-33 missiles, this is precisely known. I think that R-73 or R-77 under the wing will not prevent him from doing the same

February 6, 2019 at 6:52 pm in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2118291

paralay
Participant

Chinese source and paralay

February 6, 2019 at 5:31 pm in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2118349

paralay
Participant

this is a Chinese source translated into Russian

February 6, 2019 at 2:59 pm in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2118360

paralay
Participant

I’m curious if we have kinda official size estimate for the J-31

[ATTACH=JSON]{“data-align”:”none”,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”XAzjBTb6hA4.jpg”,”data-attachmentid”:3849846}[/ATTACH]
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,325 total)

← 1 2 3 … 5 6 7 … 87 88 89 →