dark light

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • paralay
    Participant

    Early version of the modernization of the MiG-31BM meant a blow to the ground / sea targets. Modern MiG-31BM – pure interceptor new weapon air – air.

    http://paralay.com/t05/3188.jpghttp://paralay.com/t05/3161.jpg

    in reply to: N011 vs N011M Radar #2290497
    paralay
    Participant

    Tikhomirov NIIP N011 and NIIR Phazotron Zhuk 27/MS/MSE – they are two different companies.
    H011 – slotted antenna
    N011M – PESA

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2291708
    paralay
    Participant

    I was just playing your weight game but, let’s make the calculation say when the planes are 400km apart and see how it goes.
    Nic

    I’ve already said on this subject, we can only draw 🙂

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2291749
    paralay
    Participant

    That contradicts paralay’s post that the Su has lower wingloading than the Rafale. The difference in TWR is massive in afterburner though.

    All the matter in the moment of which we speak. What significance for air combat, has weight at takeoff? We need the weight in the early dog fight 😉

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292740
    paralay
    Participant

    It does not change the state of affairs 😉

    in reply to: MiG-29 vs F-15 #2292748
    paralay
    Participant

    near dogfight
    weight second salvo – Negligible
    sweptwing
    aspect ratio
    Wing loading
    lengthening the fuselage
    thrust-to-weight
    thrust vector control
    locator simultaneously monitors
    locator simultaneously attacks
    the number of points for weapons
    RCS
    overload g
    acceleration
    range
    rate advantage over the Su-27

    long-range air combat
    high speed
    cruising speed
    range
    range radar
    locator simultaneously monitors
    locator simultaneously attacks
    the number of points for weapons
    RCS
    range
    rate advantage over the Su-27

    efficiency / cost

    generation

    success rate

    MiG-29 is superior to the F-15C close air combat to 1.18: 0.95 = 24%. At the far dogfight 0.95: 0.88 = 8% (theoretically)

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292759
    paralay
    Participant

    …how long until we see an equivalent image of an Su-35 firing one of these new missiles you talk of?.

    Missiles for the PAK FA should be ready in 2013. Probably missile for the Su-35 are ready, but we are still not reported. 🙂

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292766
    paralay
    Participant

    Why did the Su-35 wait for 1:17 hours to launch BVR missiles? Superstition 🙂 …

    Before you start shooting the Su-35 flew 1,055 km. I chose a level playing field for the Rafale and Su-35, the range of 3300 km with a radius of 3,300 km * .35 = 1155 km. 😉

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292773
    paralay
    Participant

    if you was talking about the ramjet r-77 then it has been canceled a long time ago ( it was supposed to go to production in 2010 but not even go beyond planning stage )

    These are new projects. IMHO “izd.180PD” – an initiative the company “Vympel”

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292815
    paralay
    Participant

    RVV-SD – 110 km.
    http://www.ktrv.ru/production/68/649/902/

    Then there are the “izd. 180” and “izd. 180PD” with a range of 150 km. and 250 km. from the arsenal of the PAK FA 😉
    “izd. 810” – 400 km.

    http://paralay.com/pakfa/t50%20(115).jpg

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292821
    paralay
    Participant

    Simulation of air combat one Su-35 against two Rafale, shows that:
    After 1.17 hours after takeoff, the Su-35 will fire long-range missiles, will change its position and take a high altitude flight. After 1:25 hours after takeoff open fire medium-range missiles. All this time the Rafale can not return fire, had to actively maneuver, dropping external fuel tanks with the rest of 2055 kg. Probability of hitting the two targets eight missiles over 100% in ideal conditions.

    Su-35 is a high probability to win the battle at two Rafale, with 10 RVV-SD and RVV-MD.

    Fight on guns.
    Maneuverability of the Su-35 exceeds the capabilities of Rafale, thanks to thrust vector control, greater thrust and lower wing loading. Weight second volley gun Nexter DEFA 791B slightly above GS-301 – 10.7 kg / s. vs. 9.75 kg / sec. At the same ammunition GS-301 150 shots, DEFA – 125 shots.
    In any case Rafale would have to withdraw from the battle before the Su-35 due to the much smaller fuel capacity.

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292874
    paralay
    Participant

    BTW what is the distance at which spectra detects the IRBIS?

    Spectra and the system “Khibiny” find each other, as soon as the start to run radars

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292886
    paralay
    Participant

    rafale have bigger RCS than su-35s :confused: really

    Before Rafale get rid of external fuel tanks …

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292903
    paralay
    Participant

    N035 Irbis radar
    The antenna diameter of 900 mm
    Antenna area 0.64 sq.m.
    Pulse power of 40 kW
    240 degree field of view
    Accompanied by 30 targets
    Fires 8 targets
    Target detection range ESR = 1 sq.m. – 304 km
    Rafale fighter detection range: 400 km

    PBE-2 radar PESA / PBE-2AA AESA
    The antenna diameter of 600 mm
    Antenna area 0.28 sq.m.
    Pulse power ? kW
    Field of view 120/140 degrees
    Accompanies the 40 targets
    Fires 8 targets
    Target detection range of 165 km
    Detection range of the Su-35 110 – 148 km / 165 – 180 km

    in reply to: Rafale vs Su-35 (splitting from Rafale thread) #2292932
    paralay
    Participant

    I’m sorry, but RCS estimations are purely speculative…

    Do not argue 🙂

    RCS of 2.8 sqm is off Dassault’s claim that the Rafale’s RCS is 1/10th of the Mirage 2000 RCS, which is around 1-3 sqm. So Rafale is at worst 1/10th of the 2.8 sqm paralay is claiming…

    Minimum possible value of RCS Rafale fighter – 1.4 square meters. Less will not, can not dream 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,325 total)