dark light

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2322047
    paralay
    Participant

    I’ve heard that can be hung further 2 R-37M under the wing. MiG-31M could take six R-37 under the fuselage and two under the wing (8 R-37).
    Gun MiG-31BM naturally remained in place.

    in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2323343
    paralay
    Participant

    Volume equipment compartment.
    side view of a 7.58 m
    view from the top 2.8 m
    front view of 2.57 m
    volume of 5.39 cubic meters

    density electronic equipment 350 kg / cubic meter
    weight 350 kg / cubic meter * 5.39 cubic meters = 1885 kg.

    in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2323465
    paralay
    Participant

    source: Overscan
    This page is a long alphabetical listing of all available information on Russian and Former Soviet Union avionics items (radar, IRST, EO, ECM etc) from 1950 to today. Use the search facility in your browser to search for the item you wish to find.

    The 1.1m diameter, 30cm deep, phased array antenna weighs 300kg, the whole radar weighing in at 1000kg.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2323648
    paralay
    Participant

    😎

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2323653
    paralay
    Participant

    Four under each wing, not five AFAIK…

    http://paralay.com/maks/109.jpg

    in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2323908
    paralay
    Participant

    Sorry, translator naughty 🙂
    “Transitional beams” can append AKU-170 (K-77).
    But there are no photos of this.

    http://paralay.com/t05/3235.jpg

    R-73 & APU-62

    in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2324166
    paralay
    Participant

    There are photos from R-73, to the arsenal includes R-33, R-33C and R-37m. R-77 is not currently seen.

    http://paralay.com/t05/3150.jpg

    in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2324698
    paralay
    Participant

    Good to hear that you built Mig-31 with your own hands. Do you mind sharing some of your experiences with us. Compared to Su-27 was it really a complex aircraft to build.

    Before stopping production, I did cowl guns MiG-31B and titanium engine compartment hatches on the MiG-31M. Complexity only in the materials used. Steel and titanium are difficult to process, duralumin – pleasant.
    In the photo, assembly shop fuselages. Previously, there were built MiG-25 (pictured), now there are rusting MiG-31 🙂

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2324932
    paralay
    Participant

    paralay , those LMFS link attachment you posted is that from UAC or MOD document and when was it published ?

    Date save the photo April 8, 2011. You translated this document or help you?

    Conceptual market requirements LMFS

    versatility – the ability to round the clock and all-weather interception of air attack and defeat (…) objects.

    high efficiency in air battles with foreign tactical fighters …. type EF2000, Mirage, Rafale, F-35

    Ability to conduct combat operations as over its territory and over enemy territory to a depth of 500 km.

    Potential military use in all … – geographic areas in enemy, electronic warfare.

    Market requirements for performance characteristics LMFS

    range with a normal / full refueling…

    in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2325354
    paralay
    Participant

    I with my own hands built MiG-31 to 1994 plant “Sokol” stopped. In the shops of the plant remained 5 MiG-31B and 1 MiG-31M. Theoretically they can finish. Really – it is unlikely that it will do. MiG-31M – will not finish, that’s for sure.
    T-50 will replace the MiG-31 after 2017. There is no point in starting a new program of modernization. Prior to 2018, if my memory serves me, modernize the remaining MiG-31B in the MiG-31BM. In the near future a number of aircraft to alter in a different version and the case closed.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2325359
    paralay
    Participant

    lmfs engine do not exist. easy to say paper vs real plane

    Which Chinese engines are already flying on airplanes?

    in reply to: Mig 31 Modernization: Upgraded Zaslon Radar vs Irbis/Zaslon #2326044
    paralay
    Participant

    N011M Bars weighs 650 kg.
    N007 Zaslon weighs 1500 kg.
    I think the difference in weight is a significant reason to do without replacement.

    http://paralay.com/t05/3082.jpg

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2327549
    paralay
    Participant

    good :rolleyes:
    The engine has a specific density of the design. Engine compartment – will not change. That is the volume and weight of the motor can not change much.
    I can calculate the center of gravity of the fighter, it will find the weight of the engine. I did it for the T-50 aircraft, but used outdated drawing. Motor weight – 1900 kg. Maybe I’ll correct account this weekend.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2327731
    paralay
    Participant

    Paralay, No we are comparing dry weight…

    Some dubious figures, I think this is attributed to the journalists to create a sensation. I like this would be correct:
    *
    “izd. 99” (Su-27), 12,500 kg thrust, engine weight 1530 kg, the weight of 1530 kg / 12500 kg = 0.1224
    “izd. 117S” (Su-35), thrust 14500 kg., engine weight 1520 kg, the weight of 1520 kg / 14500 kg = 0.105 (- 16.5%)
    “izd. 117” (T-50), 15 500 kg of thrust, the engine weight ~ 1500 kg, the weight of 0.097 (- 26%)
    “izd. 30” (T-50M), 17500 kg thrust, engine weight ~ 1500 kg, the weight of 0.086 (- 42%)

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2330171
    paralay
    Participant

    And if so? 2100 kg – 150 kg = 1950 kg 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,325 total)