I’ve heard that can be hung further 2 R-37M under the wing. MiG-31M could take six R-37 under the fuselage and two under the wing (8 R-37).
Gun MiG-31BM naturally remained in place.
Volume equipment compartment.
side view of a 7.58 m
view from the top 2.8 m
front view of 2.57 m
volume of 5.39 cubic meters
density electronic equipment 350 kg / cubic meter
weight 350 kg / cubic meter * 5.39 cubic meters = 1885 kg.
source: Overscan
This page is a long alphabetical listing of all available information on Russian and Former Soviet Union avionics items (radar, IRST, EO, ECM etc) from 1950 to today. Use the search facility in your browser to search for the item you wish to find.
The 1.1m diameter, 30cm deep, phased array antenna weighs 300kg, the whole radar weighing in at 1000kg.
😎
Four under each wing, not five AFAIK…

Sorry, translator naughty 🙂
“Transitional beams” can append AKU-170 (K-77).
But there are no photos of this.

R-73 & APU-62
There are photos from R-73, to the arsenal includes R-33, R-33C and R-37m. R-77 is not currently seen.

Good to hear that you built Mig-31 with your own hands. Do you mind sharing some of your experiences with us. Compared to Su-27 was it really a complex aircraft to build.
Before stopping production, I did cowl guns MiG-31B and titanium engine compartment hatches on the MiG-31M. Complexity only in the materials used. Steel and titanium are difficult to process, duralumin – pleasant.
In the photo, assembly shop fuselages. Previously, there were built MiG-25 (pictured), now there are rusting MiG-31 🙂
paralay , those LMFS link attachment you posted is that from UAC or MOD document and when was it published ?
Date save the photo April 8, 2011. You translated this document or help you?
Conceptual market requirements LMFS
versatility – the ability to round the clock and all-weather interception of air attack and defeat (…) objects.
high efficiency in air battles with foreign tactical fighters …. type EF2000, Mirage, Rafale, F-35
Ability to conduct combat operations as over its territory and over enemy territory to a depth of 500 km.
Potential military use in all … – geographic areas in enemy, electronic warfare.
Market requirements for performance characteristics LMFS
range with a normal / full refueling…
I with my own hands built MiG-31 to 1994 plant “Sokol” stopped. In the shops of the plant remained 5 MiG-31B and 1 MiG-31M. Theoretically they can finish. Really – it is unlikely that it will do. MiG-31M – will not finish, that’s for sure.
T-50 will replace the MiG-31 after 2017. There is no point in starting a new program of modernization. Prior to 2018, if my memory serves me, modernize the remaining MiG-31B in the MiG-31BM. In the near future a number of aircraft to alter in a different version and the case closed.
lmfs engine do not exist. easy to say paper vs real plane
Which Chinese engines are already flying on airplanes?
N011M Bars weighs 650 kg.
N007 Zaslon weighs 1500 kg.
I think the difference in weight is a significant reason to do without replacement.
good :rolleyes:
The engine has a specific density of the design. Engine compartment – will not change. That is the volume and weight of the motor can not change much.
I can calculate the center of gravity of the fighter, it will find the weight of the engine. I did it for the T-50 aircraft, but used outdated drawing. Motor weight – 1900 kg. Maybe I’ll correct account this weekend.
Paralay, No we are comparing dry weight…
Some dubious figures, I think this is attributed to the journalists to create a sensation. I like this would be correct:
*
“izd. 99” (Su-27), 12,500 kg thrust, engine weight 1530 kg, the weight of 1530 kg / 12500 kg = 0.1224
“izd. 117S” (Su-35), thrust 14500 kg., engine weight 1520 kg, the weight of 1520 kg / 14500 kg = 0.105 (- 16.5%)
“izd. 117” (T-50), 15 500 kg of thrust, the engine weight ~ 1500 kg, the weight of 0.097 (- 26%)
“izd. 30” (T-50M), 17500 kg thrust, engine weight ~ 1500 kg, the weight of 0.086 (- 42%)
And if so? 2100 kg – 150 kg = 1950 kg 🙂