Only the Venusians are missing at the moment

The seven archangels are from Venus, it’s no secret for those who seek knowledge 🙂

…the disappearance of numerous countries, & the expulsion & in some cases near extermination of numerous non-Russian peoples & their replacement by Russians What one might call very active forward defence. :diablo:

Let’s specifically when and where to have won, who were murdered and enslaved the evil Russian, with dates and links.

According to estimates of M. Liubavskii (a specialist in the Russian colonization of the early 20th century) – only about 12% of the territory was annexed by conquest. Mendeleev quoted similar figures. And the population of the annexed territories almost always keep their land. The West was a graveyard of the conquered peoples. Suffice it to recall that almost nothing remains of the many millions of Slavic expansion into the area between the Elbe and the Oder, Pomerania Baltic Slavs, Slavs of Pannonia, the Prussians, the Celts-Brit, was drastically reduced the number of Irish Celtic and Celtic-Gael, assimilated Celtic population of continental Europe. Europeans cross the Atlantic to the New World repeats the same story. From 75 million Indians in a hundred or so years is only about 9 million and the aborigines in Australia again the same, a decrease of 80%

the way I see it Germany and Eastern Europe want the US to stay in Europe to deter Russia…

You did not try to count the number of times the European countries attacked Russia and Russia several times to attack Europe? If you know the story and draw the correct conclusions, it will help you get rid of paranoia 😉

Would you believe somebody who told you the F-15SA was cheaper than the F/A-18E (even allowing for carrier capability and that in this case it’s the SH that is further removed from the basic airframe)?

I agree. I do not understand why the Su-30MKI is 31,000 rubles per kilogram, and the Su-34 – 25 000 rubles per kilogram, although they were made in one country, one and the same firm at the same time.
Nevertheless, this is a fact.

Is this in 2013 figures?
And is this for the Super Su-30 or from an earlier MKI deal?

Su-30 “Super Flanker” for India $ 92.5 million apiece.

How about to start to use your brain about that before claiming physical nonsense in the example of the 1.42 f.e.. 😡

No need to spread snot face. If you have an objection, then immediately start with the facts and figures 😉

Sorry but i’ve no idea what you’re trying to prove by posting a drawing. I can only assume that you’re implying that bigger always equals better which is of course not a true.

In aviation, as in boxing: a good heavy fighter always beat a good lightweight fighter. 😉
T-50 and F-22 fighter jets it, they replaced the Su-27 and F-15 respectively. 1.42 and C-37 – long-range fighter-interceptors, they had to replace not only the Su-27, Su-33, but also the MiG-31.
1.42 had a stupendous range without external fuel tanks 4500 – 4750 km. Cruise speed of M = 1.78, maximum Mach 2.35.
Its main drawback – high RCS, the rest of it more powerful than any other fighter 1990 – 2010 period.

Can you make similar comparison T-50/F-22? It would be very interesting…

A comparison of the F-22 / T-50:

area of a side view 34 / 27.8 square meters
area of the top view 110.65 / 115.6 square meters
area of ​​the front view 9.25 / 9.47 square meters

volume 65.3 / 62.45 cubic meters

http://paralay.com/paralay_tab.xls