dark light

paralay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2128285
    paralay
    Participant

    Gentlemen, offer your results and we will discuss them. The approximate weight of the aircraft and the weight of the fuel, let’s count together

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2128370
    paralay
    Participant

    And if so?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]262468[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2128517
    paralay
    Participant

    Interesting, do you have any reference or picture of the tanks in the weapons bays?

    There is no image of the inner tank. Obviously, he repeats the geometry of the weapon bay. Weight of fuel in one such tank 1500 – 1800 kg. Insiders reported that the T-50 was flying with this tank from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Zhukovsky

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2128556
    paralay
    Participant

    Calculation:
    without external tanks – 3250 km (Pogosyan spoke 3,500 km)
    1 tank in the weapons bay – 3700 km
    2 external tanks – 4100 km
    4 external tanks – 4700 km
    range at the super-high speed is 2150 km (Pogosyan – 1500 km)

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2129341
    paralay
    Participant

    The country failed, Yak-141 turned out as it should

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2129609
    paralay
    Participant

    AL-31F is suitable for such a role (Light fighter J-10, heavy fighter Su-27, Su-30, front-line bomber Su-34)
    The mandatory requirement for Russian aircraft is “take-off and landing on a ground airfield”. Perhaps that’s why the Tu-160 special engine 4 x 25000 kgf, and not 4 x 12500 kgs.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2129900
    paralay
    Participant

    The engine NK-32-02 was developed in 1987, but its production was not carried out because of problems with financing. Modernization of NK-32-02 touched the compressor and turbine blades, internal aerodynamics, and also improved internal cooling. As a result, the consumption of kerosene decreased, and the take-off thrust of 25 tons remained unchanged. The Tupolev design bureau says that in tests with new engines and basic load (six cruise missiles, that is, a mass of nine tons), the Tu-160 can overcome 13950 km, that is, 1650 km more than the standard version. Now the engine for the Tu-160M2 is designated as NK-32-02M2

    in reply to: Team Tempest Future Fighter from the UK #2130754
    paralay
    Participant

    Maximum take-off weight 24000 kg
    normal combat load: 2 or 4 medium-range missiles and two short-range missiles
    wing area 70 m2

    the drawing shows the engines Eurojet EJ200

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]262121[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2130895
    paralay
    Participant

    RCS F-22 is around 0.0001 m2 not 0.3 m2. Officials have told this. it is not rumours

    These fictions can tell for grandchildren

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2130898
    paralay
    Participant

    Irbis E PESA radar from Su-35 S is one of the best russian radars out there, it can track a 3m2 airplane from 200 kms in normal search

    Calculated data of the radar “Irbis”:
    maximum range of detection of air targets – 454 km
    light fighter without external weapons, RCS = 1 m2 – 304 km
    fighter F-22, RCS = 0.3 m2 – 225 km

    in reply to: Team Tempest Future Fighter from the UK #2131066
    paralay
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]262013[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2131129
    paralay
    Participant

    Does anyone have closer images of the T-14 radar so I can closely compare it to the side arrays of the SU-57?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]262010[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2131331
    paralay
    Participant

    and it is detected by ARMATA’s radar from 50 meters away…

    < or =50 meters – distance of destruction

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2131384
    paralay
    Participant

    “BTW you can believe in 100km AESA radar on ARMATA…. So you are capable believe in anything…”

    The estimated range of detection of a helicopter or aircraft, the radar means of a tank “Armata”, 20 – 25 km. This power allows you to intercept cannon shells at a range of up to 50 meters

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261975[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2133307
    paralay
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]261831[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 1,325 total)