Thanks for the shot of WH453……she looks very different to that now!! 🙂
Restoration is progressing well and she’s in the process of being re-built and converted back to the original F.8 configuration. Not an easy job but one we were forced into due to a lack of available D.16 parts. WH453 was heavily spares recovered when we acquired her!!!
Regards.
Graham
Hi Guys. As one of the founders of Meteor Flight I feel qualified to answer.
WA591 is coming on very well with hydrualics, airbrakes, flaps, under carriage all being fitted and with the engine bays being fitted out too.
Engines are ready and inhibited ready for fitting. The cockpit has had a new floor fitted and other extensive work carried out ready for all the internals to be refitted.
Progress is swift and positive and looking to actually come to fruition in the forseeable future. 🙂
Regards
Mark Jones
Good luck with the project Mark, and thanks to all you guys for the help with our re-build of WH453.
Regards.
Graham
Meteorflight
They seemed to be progressing well although it will be a few years before WA591 will be ready to fly.
If you haven’t already, check out their website: http://www.meteorflight.com/
Regards.
Graham
As the Meteor U.16’s nose is longer than the F.8, I presume they have found an F.8 nose from somewhere? Can anyone confirm this and know from where?
We acquired all the relevant spares from the Meteorflight at Yatesbury. WH453 should be fully assembled by the end of this year and I’m aiming to begin the painting process next summer.
Regards.
Graham Haynes
Technical Advisor
Bentwaters ‘Cold War’ Museum
http://www.bentwaters-as.org.uk
Graham- The Duxford F-86A belongs to the IWM and was acquired in an exchange for
a Meteor F.4 from Planes of Fame Chino .
Thanks for updating me David.
Cheers.
Graham, I’m pretty astounded by your remarks and lack of knowledge of the facts surrounding the above…. As a long-time member of the Midland Air Museum, and working on my project “XF382” Hawker Hunter, can I take this opportunity to correct you, or enlighten you?
Regarding the F-86 move from Duxford – it is on loan to the Midland Air Museum from the IWM @ Duxford (who as has been pointed out, own it). So no alleged breach there ok? (That was a serious allegation you made)…
Regarding the USAF Museum’s policies – they do in fact loan airframes out to private museums – the Midland Air Museum being one of many… On our books, we have T-33 / Mystere / Hunter XF382 all on loan from the USAF Museum, and that’s just the ones I know of as fact…. The Hunter has an intriguing reason for being on loan from the USAF, as it was built in 1956 with funding from the USA Military Aid Programme which was their financial assistance to the UK to enable it to re-equip it’s forces post-WW2. Built at Coventry by AWA, it flew it’s entire career with the RAF, and once retired, officially belonged to the USA Goverment, which meant it could not be offered up for disposal by the usual MOD means, as the MOD didn’t own it. So the Museum acquired it via the USAF Museum, who remain as custodians of all ex-MAP funded airframes in the UK. So there’s the correct background to the policy of USAF owned airframes being on loan to private Museums…..
I’ll get off my soapbox now, but felt it right to defend the Museum which I have worked at for the last 11 years, and who always do things right I might add… Amateurs only by virtue, professional in conduct….
Pete Buckingham
Hunter XF382 Groundcrew
Midland Air Museum
Pete,
Steady on chap. Apologies for the mis-understanding of the F-86 move. I’d got my info from another thread on this forum. Guess that was incorrect then!
When you have been faced with as many brick walls as I have when trying to construct a largely USAF-orientated museum then the slightest hint of a breach of the USAFM rules makes me see red.
As for my lack of knowledge, well….believe me I’m pretty well up to speed with the USAF’s Mutual Defence Assistance Programme (MDAP) so I’m aware of most of the issues. I think you’ll find that all your quoted MDAP airframes (T-33/Mystere etc…) were acquired before the ‘private’ museum rule came into effect (post 9/11). Suggest you check up on that as that is what I was told by Gen. Metcalf at the USAFM. Incidentally, Flixton’s Hunter is an MDAP airframe.
When we say ‘well cared for’ does that mean in a hangar or other suitable building?
If she has been acquired it will make the position of the Yorkshire Air Museum interesting in their bids to acquire an example.
Again, likewise for us at the Bentwaters ‘Cold War’ Museum. We’ve been trying for nearly three years to acquire an F-4, including one of a number of ex-Spanish AF F-4Cs that are just rotting away at Torrejon. These aircraft are mostly ex-81st TFW Bentwaters-based machines so our interest in acquiring one is understandable. The annoying part about out attempts to bring one back to the UK is that, even though we had the go-ahead from the Spanish AF, we were blocked by the USAF Museum using the usual excuse about loaning airframes to ‘private’ museums etc. The Spanish AF themselves have loaned several of these F-4s to privately-run museums and institutions in Spain so quite clearly it is one rule for one and one rule for another.
I’m getting a little tired of the secrecy involved in the ‘purchase’ of XV408. Surely if it was all above board there wouldn’t be any need for the secrecy?
Regards.
Graham Haynes
Bentwaters ‘Cold War’ Museum
We at Bruntingthorpe attempted to aquire her but were told in no uncertain terms that no ex-RAF Phantom airframe would be allowed into private hands, only “official” museums, so I for one am extremely interested as to her next port of call.
Likewise for us at the Bentwaters ‘Cold War’ Museum. We made several attempts to acquire XV408 only to be given the same excuses. If she has been bought by a ‘private’ museum (without being sold via the DSA incidentally) then I think there will be several other museums who will be asking some serious questions.
Regards.
Graham Haynes