…a damn fine looking aeroplane!
Why would IPC want to keep the Aeroplane photo archive when they’re not aiming to publish magazines with aeroplanes in any more?!
I understand the photo archive was included in the deal, seems logical to me…
As the co-publisher I thought I’d better jump in here and clarify the situation as some seem to think they know more about the project than we do!
The reason why this book has been delayed so long is that, having translated it from the original French text, it became clear that it needed a lot of reworking to make it understandable. The author’s narrative was very confusing and prone to repetition, so Simon Parry my co-publisher had to spent months of his spare time trying to re-assemble the facts into something more coherent.
The text is now being proof-read by four experts to make sure that what we publish is valid and we estimate that it’ll be published by February next year.
As for the content, well Andy has mentioned a few of the myths and legends that are shown to be untrue, but the overall aim of the book is to present what actually happened in greater depth than ever before and consider the real motives for the raid if the original story has been proved to be a smokescreen.
In regard of how long it takes to publish a book, well all I can say is that we take as long as is necessary to get things right, other publishers may not apply such high standards…!
Mark Postlethwaite
co-publisher Red Kite
I thought both brothers brought something to the programme, Colin’s appreciation of the Spitfire as a serving pilot was interesting for many of us enthusiasts but Ewan’s reactions reflected far more how the man in the street would react if put into the back of a Spitfire. I remember the first time I flew in formation with other aircraft and my reaction was exactly the same as Ewan’s!
Knowing the way TV producers minds work, I would guess that the Bader being O/C 12 Group thing was simply their way of simplifying things for their viewers, they have a very low opinion of the attention span of their audience, (maybe justified), and overly complicated explanations tend to get ‘smoothed out’ in the final edit.
MP
5 bladed prop?? An early one in the series and not one of mine!
For those who are genuinely puzzled by Osprey’s lack of recognition skills…
They do mock up covers for all of their forthcoming books, usually created by taking the aircraft type from a previous cover and pasting it onto a generic background. In this case, they have never troubled us artists to paint a Buffalo before so the poor designer, probably on a Friday afternoon, stuck a Spitfire on the cover, switched his computer off and went down the pub…
I’ll be painting the actual cover in a couple of months’ time, just got half a dozen others to get through first…
Mark Postlethwaite
long suffering and vastly underpaid Osprey cover artist.
I agree as the second visible letter can’t be a ‘T’ as they didn’t have a loop at the top. (I can’t believe I knew such a useless bit of information, I must get out more…)
It looks like a presentation Spitfire with the Eastleigh style of script. First letter appears to be M with either an L or a B about four letters along. I’ve had a quick scan through all the ‘M’s in Gifts of War without success but then reminded myself I should be working!
Thanks Adam,
I knew someone out there would know what was going on!
Mark
Watched it in a packed cinema in Leicester and thoroughly enjoyed the experience. There was no reaction to the dog’s name up here, I suppose we’re made of stronger stuff ‘up north’!
Saw the Canberra, (through a car window), and the Lincolns. But putting all the technical bits aside it made me realise what a difficult job Peter Jackson’s team will have in telling the new story accurately without it getting confusing. For example, the second wave took off before the first wave and the third wave were coming as the others were going! How do you tighten all that into a good flowing story?
One thing for sure, I can’t wait to sit in that same cinema to see the new version, it couldn’t be in better hands.
Mark Postlethwaite
I’m attaching a close up of the aircraft’s code letter, looks like an ‘O’ to me.
I seem to remember reading that the ‘Z’ equipment was to identify the aircraft as friendly to the AGLT ‘Village Inn’ rear turrets that were introduced in the summer/autumn of 44. I might be wrong though!
Mark Postlethwaite GAvA
The Lancaster in the photo is definitely QR-O as we have a further photo in the library taken a few yards further back. Closer examination shows the ‘Z’ equipment rings in the bomb aimer’s blister which would date it after R5856 had crashed. The serial number is not legible in the print so we can’t 100% prove it is LM720 although the original photo was captioned as such. What we can definitely say is that the Lanc is not R5856.
Mark Postlethwaite GAvA
Founder
http://www.ww2images.com
PS. No problem with posting our web images here, we always appreciate further information on any of the photos we have.
From the Telegraph obituary.. Henshaw, for his part, considered Churchill “the greatest Englishman of all time”
I always regarded Alex as the greatest Englishman that I had ever met.
Precise in every thought, word and deed, yet warm and devoted to those he cared for, he was an inspiration to me, not in how to fly Spitfires but in how to live the life that we are given.
The fact that he received no more than an MBE from his country displays a flawed system, because in my eyes, he was flawless.
Rest in Peace Alex.
Mark Postlethwaite