How viable is it for the Vikramaditya to call in for assistance from long-range land based assets such as the Tu-142 (armed with Brahmos and like), IL-78MKI and even A-50?
Me thinks for operations in the Indian Ocean such backup could be counted on, especially if the timing and place is of India’s choosing. Su-30s could be called in for quick assistance. We already know that 20 sqn IAF is training for such a maritime role.
Also, are there any reports of IAF IL-78s practising IFR with IN TUs? The IN has never removed the probes from the aircraft.
Bhutan has a civil airline but no fixed or rotary wing military a/c. its next to Nepal if you are wondering where it is.
Bhutan operates military aircraft (Mi-4*, Mi-8, Do-228?) under the Royal Bhutan Army, just like the Royal Nepalese Army.
Mauritius has a coast guard that operates hi-tech Do-228s.
Does Dijbouti have an airforce? What about modern Afghanistan?
erez, what does the ‘V’ mean?
A downloadable video of A Mi-26 being shotdown by Chechens;
http://video.kavkazcenter.com/battlefield_chechnya/helicopter.wmv
Relax, the site is probably meant for their internal use only on their Intranet
Perhaps the C-235 is a suitable candidate for the Erieye; the Pakistanis will soon (or already have) take delievery.
Regards to use of napalm in kargil, here are the only two new items I have that mention it:
May 29: http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/may/29kash10.htm
Since the ground forces have encountered considerable resistance in combating the intruders ensconced in the high reaches, the government is also understood to have authorised the use of petroleum jelly-filled napalm bombs along with cluster bombs. This is expected to effectively flush out the intruders and neutralise their use of Stinger missiles.
It was pointed out that once IAF aircraft start raining down cluster and napalm bombs, the targeted areas will be reduced to flaming heaps and reduce the chances of intruder activity to virtually nil.
June 1: http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/jun/01akd1.htm
The IAF is still not using bombs, depending primarily on rockets and gunfire. Also, the suggestion to use cluster bombs or napalm has been more or less ruled out.
“Bombing operations run the risk of inflicting damage on our troops also, who are in positions close to the enemy, engaging them in artillery fire,” said the IAF officer. “It is a self-imposed restriction so that our losses are kept to the minimum.”
Further, he said, napalm would be of little use in the high, barren mountain regions. “Napalm is effective in the jungles and flat lands,” he said.
I need a 3D model of LCA for my new website
Check the previous pages of this thread.
There should be a bit of aerial processing aboard the Erieye as well, but not enough to cover the whole area under the system’s surveillance. However, the Erieye also serves as a relay platform to pass on the data from the ground station back up to the aircraft working in the network. Also, the fact that the control unit is on the ground makes it easier to integrate other data in the command post (like ground-based radars), which is another reason why the Swedes have chosen to keep the control crew in their nice and safe turbulence-free bunker.
Besides, both the E-2C and A-50 (the non-Israeli ones that is) also delegate a part of their control job to the ground.
What happend if you take out the bunker on the ground? Dont you loose half the advantage an airborne platform offers?
Also isn’t this system an AEW, the distinction being not having any control capabilites as compared to an AWAC?
I think the fundamental difference is that the radar data from the Erieye will have to be downloaded to a ground station first, where officers will direct own forces to act upon the bogies. Meaning the C&C cannot be performed from the airborne platform itself. So in a way this system is like giving a more conventional GCI station additional over-the-horizon capabilities and not in the class of an E-2.
But i think this is still a gross underestimation of the system’s capabilities and the Erieye is much more than Ka-31. :p
Any reason why there’s a pic of a Rafale in the Battleaxes’ room?
Probably because the AdA Rafale squadron presented it to the Battleaxes CO as a momento. Militaries around the world do this (give gifts to each other). The occasion could have been an Indian pilot’s flight in a Rafale etc. Another example could be of an french officer coming to India to attend an IAF course or vice versa, say to attend FCL course at TACDE.
PS: the pix RK posted were minis, the link contains pics in 3000+ res (yum)
Go here to grab the loot. ~40 photos!
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Images/Special/CopeIndiaReport/index.htm
First time noticing Mig 29’s were part of the exercise as well
No, only a part of the photoshoot 🙂
the link doesnt work ?
Tripod does not allow direct linking of photos. You’ll have to visit the webpage instead;
http://vayu-sena-aux.tripod.com/other-Parakram-IAF-UAV-Wreckage.html
The photo is from the AFD2003 Full Dress Rehearsal, a flypast of both heron and S-II was scheduled together, but the former did not turn up :rolleyes: I think it worked out on the actual parade fortunately.