dark light

aditya

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 453 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2399440
    aditya
    Participant

    Any chance of a Su-47 style rotary launcher?

    http://airvoila.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/sukhoi-su-47-berkut-aguila-dorada-esquema.jpg

    in reply to: PAK-FA MKI #2399444
    aditya
    Participant

    Instead of debating how and if a “Su-50I” will ever be accomplished, we can try listing out the potential enhancements:

    1. Second seat for co-pilot
    2. Indian manufactured MFDs
    3. Elbit HMDS (as seen in MiG-29K)
    4. Integration of Indian LGBs
    5. Integration of Astra AAM
    6. Indian EW suite
    7. India manufactured composite materials
    8. Integration with Vinten recce pods
    9. Integration with Litening LDP
    10. Integration with Israeli EW and ECM pods
    11. HAL INCOM communications suite
    12. IFF
    13. Datalink with A-50EI and MKI

    The aspect where Su-30MKI will always trump the Su-50I is integration with Brahmos. MKI has a heavy duty centreline pod which still requires modification to ferry the Brahmos.

    I also doubt there will be a MKI variant of the PAKFA. With India sharing the costs it makes sense for both countries to share at least some of the equipment.

    in reply to: What is this plane? #2399448
    aditya
    Participant

    Try searching on the serial number. RA-75490

    I did not get anything

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2401835
    aditya
    Participant

    The F-35 looks more like a baby T-50 than a baby F-22 as some folks found it :diablo:

    5,500 K range seems too much

    MOSCOW, January 29 (RIA Novosti) – Russia’s fifth-generation fighter performed its maiden flight on Friday.

    * The T-50 is the domestic name of Russia’s fifth-generation fighter plane which has been developed as the Advanced Front-Line Aviation Complex (PAK FA) for Russia’s Air Force.

    * The project started its development by the Sukhoi design bureau since it won the tender in April 2002.

    * The Tikhomirov Institute of Instrument Design, which developed the Irbis radar for the Su-35BM Flanker, has been working on the T-50 radar. The new fighter’s radar and fire-control system will be designed on the basis of the Su-35BM’s systems.

    * The new fighter’s exterior design was approved on December 10, 2004.

    * Last summer, the fighter’s design was approved, and the prototype blueprints were delivered to the KNAAPO aircraft building company based in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, where three experimental fighters will be built for testing.

    * In February 2009, the first prototype was constructed. After the plane was successfully tested on the runway, a decision was made to stage the maiden flight in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, rather than in Moscow.

    * The prototype fifth-generation fighter made a 47-minute maiden flight on January 29, 2010, in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.

    * Although T-50 specifications remain classified, fragmentary data on its engines imply that this heavy-duty fighter will have a take-off weight of more than 30 metric tons and will be close in dimension to the well-known Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker.

    * The new fighter’s exterior was designed using Stealth technology, also known as LO technology (low observable technology).

    * The combat aircraft is fitted with 117S (upgraded AL-31) turbofan engines from the Russian aircraft engine manufacturer Saturn.

    * The PAK FA can carry either eight next-generation air-to-air R-77 missiles, or two large controllable anti-ship bombs weighing 1,500 kg each.

    * The new jet can also carry two long-range missiles developed by the Novator Bureau which can hit targets within a 400 kilometer range.

    * The jet can use a take-off strip of just 300-400 meters, and perform sustained supersonic flight at speeds over 2,000 km/h, including repeated in-flight refueling. The highly-maneuverable plane has a range of about 5,500 kilometers.

    * The fifth-generation fighter is equipped with advanced avionics to combine an automatic flight control system and a radar locator with a phased array antenna.

    * The newest combat aircraft are planned to be mass produced in Komsomolsk-on-Amur from 2015.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Baaz questions #2404778
    aditya
    Participant

    hanging R-77s on it seems a 50/50 issue though!

    no pics show an Indian mig-29 with the missile or associated pylon…but lots of secondary evidence = hard decision!

    This scan from Indian Defence Review might help;

    http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/6405/idraams.jpg
    By vayusena at 2010-01-28

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2427063
    aditya
    Participant

    Any pics of PAF F-16B S/n suffix 605?

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2427579
    aditya
    Participant

    Ok, another of 6615, together with 6612 near Bagan. Apologies for quality..

    66-12-15b

    Mi-17 6616

    Which Mi-17 version is that? Unique rear door

    in reply to: Sepecat Jaguar #2428669
    aditya
    Participant

    How many load stations does the Jaguar have? The main thing i don’t know is fuselage points. Normally in RAF service it would of had 2 drop tanks on the inner wing and sidewinders on the over wing points. What was the normal load for the outer wing points and fuselage points?
    http://www.militaryaircraft.de/pictures/military/aircraft/Jaguar-GR3A/Jaguar-GR3A_RIAT2005_015_800.jpg

    ID the centreline pod?

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2429291
    aditya
    Participant

    Hi, looking for a photo of An-12 and An-32 armed with free fall bombs…. any pics?

    in reply to: The Brand New IAF Thread (IX) – Flamers NOT Welcome #2412977
    aditya
    Participant

    Here is one picture of Ulka:

    http://vayu-sena.indianmilitaryhistory.org/today-IAF-nuclear-weapons-development.shtml

    + some info on some other interesting air launched stuff 😉

    Apologies for being verbose. I completely missed the Aero-India discussions when all these Rustom-* were being discussed.

    As Rahul once said in one of the discussions, one would almost think that Rustom in India means a UAV….:D

    Rayrubik had put up snap of the same mockup. I just wanted to see a snap which mentioned it specifically to be the Rustom UAV since the one below was also mentioned to be Rustom:

    http://www.satnews.com/cgi-bin/display_image.cgi?243177768

    Thanks for the Chakor UAV info. Google kept given the Northrop UAV as the query result. Former BR poster JCage said this:

    Damn. BR archives are a complete gold mine of information.

    Regards,
    Ashish.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2436156
    aditya
    Participant

    Any good articles on PAF ops in NWFP and FATA?

    in reply to: RAF plans huge cuts in planes and bases #2436159
    aditya
    Participant

    Could someone enlighten me why the only news about RAF, RN and British Army ever is related to

    1) Reducing the seize of the force
    2) No helicopters

    Whats wrong? Why is Britain hell bent on cutting her armed forces when the boys are always at War? Is it really that the UK is short of funds? Were these forces too large to begin with?

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2468137
    aditya
    Participant

    Thanks, most likely the radar is missing because of chin mounted machine gun is installed in that area.

    No idea about the exact variant, but the fenders/boxes are probably emergency floatation gear as seen on this Venezuelan SAR version:

    http://www.daylife.com/photo/0cCHe0ffLBbzO

    A few other distinctive features from the picture: it has the starboard sliding door and a rear ramp but lacks a weather radar.

    in reply to: IAF – News & Discussion #2469174
    aditya
    Participant

    Can anyone identify this Mi-17 variant used in Mumbai op?

    http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/599/2india112808pi3.jpg

    I have highlighted the mysterious parts on the fuselage.

    It also has fenders which I have seen for the first time in a Hip

    in reply to: Mirage IV Disposition? #2492651
    aditya
    Participant

    Naah, that would be third after Tu-160 :diablo:

    Arguably, next to the B-58 Hustler, the most beautiful bombers ever built.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 453 total)