dark light

Sintra

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 3,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2087986
    Sintra
    Participant

    The 2008 evaluation was done with a “D” not a “C”, a heavier aircraft that carries a bit less fuel.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2088364
    Sintra
    Participant

    That’s a beauty

    in reply to: Experimenting The F-35 Against SAMs #2089595
    Sintra
    Participant

    I love these arguments.
    Not one iota of information on the public domain on how these systems would fare against each other… But one and a half pages and we are already on industrial fisheries!
    Can we stop the thread? There’s no available information in order to make any meaningful insight. The end.
    ​​​

    in reply to: The potential for joint Russian-Chinese collaboration #2091744
    Sintra
    Participant

    Yak did a model of this STOL (not sure if its STOVL) stealth jet 2 decades ago. Would its design still be useful today? looks a bit too small to have a bay

    [ATTACH=JSON]{“alt”:”Click image for larger version Name:tyakovlev_MFI_2.jpg Views:t261 Size:t32.5 KB ID:t3868858″,”data-align”:”none”,”data-attachmentid”:”3868858″,”data-size”:”full”,”title”:”yakovlev_MFI_2.jpg”}[/ATTACH]

    It was not a STOL or a VSTOL and it was a quite a big jet, it was the YAK design for the MFI program, the one that Mig took with the 1.42/1.44. The engine was also gigantic, the Sojuz R-179-300 with 200,1 kN of thrust. The aircraft was bigger than an F-35.

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2093307
    Sintra
    Participant

    Brasil ordered 36 Gripens, the FAB fields around one hundred F-5E and AMX. I have no doubt that they will order more Gripens, but how many? If SAAB enters Tempest, there’s a fine chance that the Brazilians would give a hard good look at the program.
    Canada, well what can we say about Canada? The Hornet replacement program sure looks like shambles… I can see HM MOD and BAE talking to the Canadians, long shot, but…
    The Middle Eastern chaps have the most pressing need in order for this program to take off, funds… BAE, RR and Leonardo have all the know how needed in order to build some decent hardware, what they don’t have, and what the UK MOD lacks is money.
    India, thats a sure bet, more than certain that BAE and the MOD have already talked with the chaps.

    Cheers

    in reply to: UK's new Tempest fighter ! #2093337
    Sintra
    Participant

    Saudi Arabia should be obvious.
    Canada, Kuwait, Oman, Brasil, Qatar, UAE, India?

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2095301
    Sintra
    Participant

    Saab is out. The end. That was officially stated by these chaps called “Armasuisse”. And the chance of doing the flight test on a later date is dead.
    And that is on “Armasuisse” official site, right on the front page. Saab is officially excluded from the Swiss competition.

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2095398
    Sintra
    Participant

    And SAAB is out!

    Well, this is unexpected. And me thinking that the chaps were the frontrunner.

    https://saabgroup.com/media/news-pre…-flight-tests/
    https://www.vtg.admin.ch/content/vtg…tml/75184.html

    I suspect that this has just become something between Dassault and the Americans

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2095673
    Sintra
    Participant

    The interchangeable sensors really isn’t a selling point unless you bought a French aircraft pre Meteor and had the awful selection of previous generation french missiles available to you.

    ?
    In what particular way the likes of the Magic, Magic 2 and Super 530F/D were awful by comparison with their contemporary equivalents?
    Their combat record seems to be pretty decent, there are quite a number of Mig´s, Sukhoi, Phantom´s, Tigers, Tomcats and even a Viper and TU-22 that ended in the receiving end of a French pre Matra Mica AAM and decent PK´s for AAM´s are a recent thing.

    Cheers

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095676
    Sintra
    Participant

    Sadly!

    What you actually mean is: “Sadly for my particular favorite company, Lockheed Martin”
    And thank the gods that LM and a bucket load of (mainly American) aerospace “afficionados”, the likes Loren Thomson, Aboulafia et al were wrong when they predicted that LM would have cornered the entire western fighter production by 2020 (yes, till around 2015 LM had a slide in every sales ppt in wich showed the timeline of western fighter production and every one would be left with Dave has a single option past 2020), i can only imagine the kind of premium that Western Air Forces would have to pay if ended up in a monopoly situation.
    Its dam good to everyone to have a bit of competition, and that includes Lockheed Martin.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095804
    Sintra
    Participant

    Predictions aren’t realities are they?

    The program has been stable for several years now (what Ozair wrote right above).

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2095807
    Sintra
    Participant

    Under $80 million for the most advanced fighter to ever take the sky… Goodbye rafale, gripen and typhoon market.

    Dont quite remember the DOD saying that exports of Dave for the Midle East, India, North Africa and South America were sudenly “open” and i am not really seing the Germans, Spanish, Swedish and French droping their national products for their own Airforces in order to acquire US kit… Both Boeing and the Europeans are going to get a few more deals with their current products, i wouldnt even dismiss the possibility of all the Western 4.5 getting into ~2030 still in production.

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2100030
    Sintra
    Participant

    There is zero point in trying to equivocate timelines between to very different programs. If your going to use 1993 JAST precursor for the F-35, then you’d have to go back to MFI program for the Su-57, contract award dates? Those don’t really work either.

    That would be correct if somehow the SU-57 ended up being a direct variant of either the Mig1.44 or the Sukhoi S-37, wich he´s not.
    While Lockheed Martin C-190 JAST design from 1995 “was” (and ended up being) the F-35, there´s not much in common (if anything) between the MFI program and the SU-57. The MFI program was terminated, and a new program was launched with entirely new specifications, the JAST program on the other hand simply changed its name to “JSF” in 1996.
    Right from the bat, from January 1994 onwards The JAST program was meant to replace the classical Hornet, the F-16, the A-10 and the Harrier in the States and the Harrier in the UK, by November 1994, the requirements had solified into a tri service single engined stealth strike fighter with three variants, one of them a STVOL for the Marines and the RN.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2100927
    Sintra
    Participant

    A new video about the SU57, or “Hunter”? Great, thanks.
    A video about the silliness that you’ve posted before? Don’t need to bother

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2100939
    Sintra
    Participant

    [USER=”143″]eagle[/USER]
    He insults the east I insult the west by bringing up actual reports from sources that are accountably true.

    You´ve brought two tabloid news, from two very unreputable sources, reeking both of the worst kind of homophobia and racism…
    Thats what you´ve actually brought
    And if you want to discuss the % of Muslins versus the Population of a Country or the numbers of Crimes, do it in the “General Forum”, not here.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 3,443 total)