The average sell price of a herc 130J is about $60M, the cheapest A400 will be $136M. .
The average price sell of a “Juliete” is about $60M?!!!!!
Not by a very, very, very lOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNGGG shot…
There´s a HUGE diference between prices quoted by Lock Mart executives and the real pay check that the client´s, at least the foreign ones, have been signing.
Just look at the Norwegian, Canadian, Italian, Denmark, “whatever” deals…
When i saw the Canadian C-130 J program costs, i couldn´t believe my eyes, 2.85 Billion US$ for 17 planes, AND another 1,51 Billion US$ for suport and spares.
Looking at these numbers, the A400M starts to look as a very “economical” plane.
That is 28 Mio inhabitants against 190 Mio. Even Chavez is not that crazy.
Hope so.
There is a long difference between been a “mockup” and “never have fly”.
Izdeliye 172S-1 (K-100-1), better said, its initial design flight as unguided (rocket test, telemetry test) in the 90s, and R&D have been continued since early 2000, with GNPO Agat researching the “Shayba” seaker head for it (and you have just to look at the different number of JMR articles on the issue the last two years, mainly this one)
That applies pretty well in my book as “under research” and not exactly just a CAD/CAE idea (that would be just feasibility study, and early one!)
And again, why in hell we would want to attack Brazilean boys at all?, stop to dream, we don’t care about the Brazileans, or at least, don’t care about you as much as you care about us 😮 😀
As per the arguments here, nice and fine…no matter of how much correct or false they’re.
Do you have any source for those unguided “rocket” tests?
Everything that I´ve read till today (and it´s a lot) tell´s me that they didn´t happen (but I admit that i might be wrong).
And yes, I have been reading about the Agat seeker for the KS-172, let me see, hmmm, for the last 14 year´s? In my book that´s not “under research”, it´s “we don´t have the money to develop the dam thing, so were trying, hard, to sell the concept to the Indian´s, who in 2004 ALMOST bought the idea”…
And again, I´m from the other side of the “pond” (Atlantic).
Cheers 😉
Just don´t forget those mysterious black holes on this supposed ” well-developed ground radar system, & good airborne & ground-based comms support” wich can very explored by a good air forve like FAV.
I agree that Brazil has and edge when it comes to the AEW but you should consider that the border between Venezuela and Brazil its just not covered as the border between Brazil and Argentina.
You are correct.
… and the last thing South America needs is a local arms race.
Do you have any idea how much money the venezuelan government has spent in arms in the last three year´s?
Venezuela, right now, his the second largest Russian arms recipient.
Since 2005 the Venezuelan´s have signed contracts for 24 SU-30MKV, 5 kilos SSK´s, dozens and dozens of Mi-17, Mi-26, Mi-35, 100.000 Kalashnikov´s, etc, etc, etc, etc… The last contract was a 3 Billion US dolars for fighter jet´s and helicopter´s. On top of that they signed with Spain a 1,5 Billion Us Dolar worth of OPV´s, corvettes and military transport aircraft.
And the worst part is that there´s no sign that this military “Christmas spending spree” his slowing down, quite the oposite. There´s every reason to believe that another batch of Flanker´s will be acquired, another four Amur SSK , etc, etc, etc…
Military “threat” perception.
Hugo Chavez,the Venezuelan President, recently, threatened a military intervention in Bolivia, right on the Brasilian border. He´s on the record for saying that Venezuela will create a “million men army”… In the beggining he was taken for a “lunatic”. After signing contract after contract of fighter jet´s, SSK´s, ship´s, guns, etc, etc, Brasil and every country who has a frontier with Venezuela, his starting to see Mr Chavez rant´s as something “deadly serious”.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4682488.stm
Please tell me, what the hell should the Brasilian government do, when his northern neighbour is spending oil money on Russian arm´s like there´s no tomorrow… Nothing?!!!:rolleyes:
Can anyone please tell me why Brazil – or any other S. American nation – needs state of the art interceptors?
Uruguay about to invade, is it..? Or, maybe they make good spray planes for use in anti-malarial programmes..?
Damn, silly me, just twigged… they’ll use the afterburners to ready-dry-roast all those coffee beans….
OH NO, those pesky South Americans, buying fighters… OH MY…
Why would some pacific coffee planters need combat jets?!!! :rolleyes:
Get yourself a decent history book and you will discover that South America has been “playing” the “border war tune” for two centuries… And for a few times those “border wars” were a multinational “can of worms”.
In 1995, Peru and Equador were at each other throat´s, in 1982 there was a thing called “Malvinas war”, etc…
Says who…you? :rolleyes:
If I remember well, Mikhail Pogosyan in December 2006…
The KS-172-1 was never flown, it´s a cardboard weapon.
But if you have ANY proof that I´m wrong, I´l be more than happy to acknolege my wrong assumptions…
Of course that it would a bit strange that such a weapon had passed such an important development step without one single RUMOUR, let alone any press conference.
I was forgeting, i´m not Brazilian, i don´t have a nationalist bias in this question…
I am not sure if Ks-172 is being offered but that is good enough to take out any awacs. Brazil has never used russian aircrafts, so I can’t really see them going for Su-35 even though it is the best option.
Broncho
The famous Ks-172, was presented by the first time in 1993…
It was never flown. Until now it´s only a “cardboard, spit and glue” mockup backed up by CAD-CAM computer graphics.
Now, why someone would worry with a “paper” weapon in the South American theatre? 😉
Cheers 🙂
F-5BR? Are you serious? Su-30 Mk with R-77 is more than capable of handling them. The eyerie though is potent threat.
One SU30MKK (V) against two to three BVR shooter´s fully networked backed up by a Erieye fleet and a full ECM, C4I, ground radar network, and 150 hours/year flight time for every Brazilian pilot…
Good luck to the venezuelans.
I don’t like to compare thing to often but… are you serious about this?
IAF’s Su-30MKI, although different from these MKVs of AMV, had a very good results with American F-15C on Cope India 2004(I don’t wanna say wiped as a lot of journals had reported then), you really think that Su-30MKVs could be handled by F-5BR (with the help of all this equipment you mentioned)?
First, the MKV are basicaly the MKK2, that´s huge RCS backed up by a dreadful radar (for the size of the set)…
Yes, with a two/three to one advantage, the Ereye on the air and a very good ground radar network it would be a very brave Venezuelan pilot who tried to cross the northern Brazilian frontier.
Really?? Brazil with all its hand me down dozen mirages will out fly, out sortie and shoot down flankers? What do you think the flankers are F-15’s that blow themselves up?:rolleyes:
No, Broncho
They would “swamp” the Flanker´s with dozens and dozens of F5BR, backed up by a very good network of AEW R-99 and ground radar´s. That´s a much tougher oponent than 12 “hand me down” MIRAGES.
The F5BR equiped with the “Derby”, Python IV, Grifo, HMD DASH, and a very nice data-link is nothing to laugh about, as the French discovered in the latest Cruzex exercises…
Cheers 😉
Thanks for the MiG-35 images, MadRat.
Wasn’t there a single engine version of the Fulcrum planned?
Yes, the Izdeliye 33.
Could you name a fighter equivalent to the F 16 blk. 60?
In the air-air arena?
Well, a VERY obvious RAPTOR…:diablo:
Still on the subject, any variant of the MKI/MKM, the Typhoon, the USAF AESA equiped “Eagle´s”, or even the RAFALE, are MORE than a match to the Block60. 😉
The informations given were that they were first hand airplanes…!
The original text from “La Tribune”:
“De sources concordantes, l’avion de combat de Dassault Aviation aurait perdu toute chance de succès à Rabat face à la proposition des Etats-Unis qui proposent des F-16 d’occasion prélevés sur ceux de l’US Air Force“, écrit le quotidien, pour qui les industriels comptaient sur l’Elysée pour inverser la tendance en faveur des Etats-Unis.
Selon La Tribune, les Etats-Unis auraient proposé 36 F-16 fabriqués par Lockheed Martin pour moins de 2 milliards de dollars quand la France a proposé au Royaume chérifien 18 Rafale pour 2,3 milliards d’euros (3,2 milliards de dollars au cours actuel d’un euro pour 1,40 dollar).
“Informés de l’offre américaine, les pouvoirs publics ont tenté de réagir. Ils ont réaligné leur offre sur celle des Américains en proposant 24 avions de combat pour un montant de deux milliards d’euros. On évoquait deux hypothèses pour la nouvelle offre française : 12 Rafale et 12 Mirage 2000 au dernier standard (2000-9) ou 24 Rafale”, ajoute-t-il.
Personne n’était joignable jeudi soir chez Dassault Aviation pour commenter ces informations.
Le ministre de la Défense, Hervé Morin, a imputé récemment les difficultés rencontrées par la France pour exporter le Rafale à la sophistication technologique de l’appareil.
Le porte-parole de l’Elysée, David Martinon, est monté jeudi au créneau pour défendre l’appareil, qui équipe seulement l’armée de l’air et la marine françaises et n’a pour le moment décroché aucun contrat à l’export.
“Les experts disent que c’est en effet le meilleur avion du monde et qu’en plus il est extrêmement polyvalent, il peut conduire des missions très différentes”, a dit David Martinon lors de son point de presse hebdomadaire.
“Donc si vous voulez en acheter, considérez que vous pouvez en acheter moins que d’autres avions puisque vous pouvez les utiliser dans plusieurs missions différentes”, a-t-il ajouté. “Donc c’est une bonne affaire.”
Are u sure?
In may 2007 Turkey signed a deal for 30 F-16 block50+ for 1.78 bln $.It’s worth noting that the initial offer to Morocco from Dassault was 18 Rafale for 2 bln€. After the LM offer, Dassault proposed 12Rafale+12 M2000 for 2 bln €.
At the end Dassault arrived to offer 24 Rafale (brand new or not, who knows?) for 2 bln€.
Eagle is correct, the original story (in french) speak´s of used F16´s… We are talking of old airframes, not BLOCK 50/52 plus.
And no, the USAF it´s not going to sell their latest Viper´s.
But until I see something in the FMS about a possible sale to Morocco I am not going to give any credit to this “sale”.