dark light

Sintra

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 3,436 through 3,443 (of 3,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2510575
    Sintra
    Participant

    for the typhoon as it is its thread!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APiiKsH0dR4&mode=related&search=

    What the h…?!

    “Five and a half ton´s of fuel”…
    From the pilot.

    5,5 ton´s of INTERNAL fuel?! In a Typhonn?!
    That´s half a ton more than expected :confused:

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2512891
    Sintra
    Participant

    Then how did he know the details of the Saudi deal before it was released? Why do you believe that it wouldn’t count towards the UK commitment?

    Did he? Or he simply got the number of planes bought by the Saudis right? 😉
    There´s a huge topic about “72 Tiffies for Saudi Arabia”, in a certain Rumour Forum. That topic started in April 2006…

    Because the Italian, the German, the Spanish, the industry (and the RAF) would be yelling “BLOODY MURDER” on the top of their lungs…
    There´s a basic fact of life, EUROFIGHTER GMBH has on it´s hand´s a contract signed by four MOD´s that states that there will be 620 “PHOON´s” working with the squadron´s of four Air Forces. And none of those four his called the “Royal Saudi Air Force”…
    The idea that simply droping the T3 for the RAF with a cheap trick like “diverting” the planes (and the payment) to the RSAF wouldn´t be hotly contested in court by every other member of the Eurofighter consortium is a “pipedream”. Just for starter´s, what happen´s to the work division of the four partner´s?

    in reply to: F-5EM (BR) with CFT #2513317
    Sintra
    Participant

    I also have my doubts if these pics are really true.:confused: ……i´m looking for confirmation.:cool:

    A-29

    Those pics came from ALIDE or DB? Tried to find them, but nothing :confused:

    They do seem to be photoshoped.

    in reply to: How to destroy the Aussie defence- Is this for real?? #2513458
    Sintra
    Participant

    Actually no. This is a problem with these theorists that like to compare things in paper. The Super Hornet actually did more than hold its own in exercises against the Typhoon.

    What exercises? The only exercises between those two jet´s were in China Lake/USA, and the result´s are classified…
    But, if the rumour “smoke screen” that escapes from the 17(R) RAF is to be taken seriously (it´s not, it´s BLOODY rumour;) ) the “Super Bug” didn´t hold its own against the “Tiffie´s”, quite the contrary.

    in reply to: the PAK-FA saga, continued…… #2518439
    Sintra
    Participant

    Do you still have doubts about us being at the verge of a new “Cold War”? I don’t have, the difference is that this time around the Russians much richer and have become one of the world’s largest oil and gas exporters… 😉

    😉 :diablo:

    Regards

    Hammer

    And have a much smaller economy than the old USSR and are on the verge of a population “meltdown”.
    China, on the other hand… :diablo:

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2518696
    Sintra
    Participant

    I dunno what venezuela paid for the MKV (MKK derived), pit would know; but malaysia paid a mere $ 900 million for 18 Su 30mkm (based on the much more advanced MKI), which equals about $ 45+ per bird, and the russians even agreed to put a malaysian astronaut in space for that much. 🙂

    Surely the IAF MKI does not cost $ 60 million. The last reports i read put the entire deal for 240 a/c at about $ 8.5 billion (including weapons, spares, support, TOT, and perhaps even upgrades!) beat that. And even if it turns out about $ 60 million including all the extras, its waaay cheaper than the Typhoon. Remember, the saudis are paying upwards of $ 10 billion for 70 typhoons. pricey stuff.

    scorpion,
    i’d estimate the Su 35 (single seater) with IRBIS etc @ around $ 50 million + support, weapons etc. no more than $ 70 million tops. thats less than 1/2 of the ef 2000. As far as the HUGE fuel load goes, the EF would cost more too if it lugged around that much in tanks. with extra fuel comes extra range and performance. And lets not forget (the very “weaknesses” of the flanker” allow it to outperform the EF2000 in criteria such as payload, range, and a tremendously powerful radar.

    regards,
    USS.

    I dunno what venezuela paid for the MKV (MKK derived), pit would know; but malaysia paid a mere $ 900 million for 18 Su 30mkm (based on the much more advanced MKI), which equals about $ 45+ per bird, and the russians even agreed to put a malaysian astronaut in space for that much. 🙂

    Surely the IAF MKI does not cost $ 60 million. The last reports i read put the entire deal for 240 a/c at about $ 8.5 billion (including weapons, spares, support, TOT, and perhaps even upgrades!) beat that. And even if it turns out about $ 60 million including all the extras, its waaay cheaper than the Typhoon. Remember, the saudis are paying upwards of $ 10 billion for 70 typhoons. pricey stuff.

    scorpion,
    i’d estimate the Su 35 (single seater) with IRBIS etc @ around $ 50 million + support, weapons etc. no more than $ 70 million tops. thats less than 1/2 of the ef 2000. As far as the HUGE fuel load goes, the EF would cost more too if it lugged around that much in tanks. with extra fuel comes extra range and performance. And lets not forget (the very “weaknesses” of the flanker” allow it to outperform the EF2000 in criteria such as payload, range, and a tremendously powerful radar.

    regards,
    USS.

    Old Number´s

    Inflation as hit Russia. Venezuela paid $1.600 million for 24 aircraft´s, plus logistical suport, training and armament. That´s almost $67 million per plane. A MKK… The number came directly from the Venezuelan MOD. (it´s in Spanish, but more here: http://www.fav-club.com/articulos/flankeranida/flankervzla.htm)
    The 2004/2006 Sukhoi offer to Brazil, the SU-35BR (a SU30 MKI with one hole) was for 24 fighter´s at $50 million per plane plus a logistical contract worth $232 million, for ten year´s. The number´s came from Pedro Resende, the Brasilian correspondent to JANE´s (if you read Portuguese i can send you the link).

    The number for the “Unit Cost Production” of the MKI came from report´s of the Indian Congress that are widely available.
    The $8.5 Billion that you mention seem´s to be for just the first 100 fighter´s, but i might be wrong on this one.
    The Indian´s are furious with a very high cost escalation of every single piece of military equipment suplied by the Russian´s. That goes from Aircraft Carrier´s to fighter´s.

    Under the $8.5 billion said to be the single largest export contract for Russia’s Irkutsk Corporation, which also involves technology transfer, Moscow has so far supplied 60 fighters and said it was willing to deliver 40 more at the current cost escalation of 2.55 per cent.

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/India_Russia_review_defence_contracts/articleshow/2067515.cms

    The Saudis aren´t paying $10 Billion for 72 Typhoon´s. The contract isn´t inked yet. That number as been “thrown” around by the press, it´s just speculation. It MIGHT get to $10 Billion, but I bet that pay´s the “Tiffies” and something like 50 BAE´s Hawk´s and a few new airbases built as a bonus.

    Bottom line. If the Russian´s can pull a “fly away” price of 50 million for the SU-35BM, i am going to be very surprised.

    Cheer´s 🙂

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon news #2518714
    Sintra
    Participant

    So what is the cost for a Su-35? I suspect it to be in the range between 40-45 mln USD fly-away. If you include all the required logistics, training devices, support, spares etc. the costs will probably further rise by a fair margin. The Su-35 carries twice the fuel of a Typhoon and over a period of 25-30 years the Typhoon might well be cheaper. But that’s to much speculation at all due the lack of real hard data.

    What SU-35? The BM who is going to be the Star of MAKS? Or the one from 1994?
    There are several documents from the Indian Parliament who put the most advanced “Flanker” variant flying today, the MKI, in the $60/$65 million “Unit Production Cost” (fly away price in other words). Those same documents admit that a MKI built in Russia is cheaper, but for how much?
    Those 40-45 mln USD fly-away look “consistent” with the price paid by Venezuela for the MKV, actually a MKK. The idea that a SU35BM with a new radar that isn´t in production, a new engine for which the development is in a dreadful political/economical “imbroglio”, a fuselage rebuilt, etc, etc, etc, for the same cost of those MKV seems a bit optimistic to me.

    Cheer´s 🙂

    in reply to: More detail on the 60 Raptors for $5 billion? #2518770
    Sintra
    Participant

    What BIO said.

    I think on that deal ( someone correct me ) that there was an additional long lead time pre-buy of $2.3 billion for various parts to add to that $5 billion for a total of $7.3 billion.

    That original $5 billion statement caught me off guard too at first.

    So think $7.3 billion for those 60.

    $7.3 Billion WITHOUT the engines. That money went to Lockheed. The engines are “government funded”.

    Pratt & Whitney was awarded another $1.3 Billion for F119 Engines for those 60 Raptor´s.

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi-bin/client/modele.pl?session=dae.28841111.1187275850.M1LZtH8AAAEAACKVun8AAAAB&modele=jdc_34

    $8.6 Billion for 60 F22´s. At $143.3 million, it´s a bit expensive. Well, the very best is alway´s expensive.

Viewing 8 posts - 3,436 through 3,443 (of 3,443 total)