Israel.
Why would Turkey and Israel get into a fight?
Which bring out another theeses.
With the good Russian-Israel relations, we could see S-400 in Israel at some point
S-400´s in Israeli colours? The chaps who receive four billion US$ a year from the Pentagon?
It might be me and i might be entirely wrong, but i have a feeling in that case the Russians might has well pass directly the entire manual and specifications to the chaps at Nellis AFB…
Cheers
Well…maybe against its today’s allies, who, many years later, may decide that Erdogan’s regime isn’t democratic enough and should be ‘democratized’ and replaced via another one “Freedom to ” operation? 😀 Of course, it’s, mostly, a joke, but…honestly – you never know, who may appear next, in the bombsights of the Golden Billion…woops, i mean…Free World. :rolleyes:
Dont quite remember NATO doing a “1956 Hungary” or “1968 Czechoslovakia” thingy on the past, invading their own “allies” is, oh, so “Soviet”, but not particularly “Natish”… and taking into account that good old De Gaulle said “GTFU” (“G” is for get) to the Pentagon, Turkey invaded Cyprus, Portugal, Spain and Greece maintained dictatorships, etc, etc, etc, is pretty safe to assume that good old Erdogan´s is safe from a “Free World” military intervention.
You forgot too late to modify QE class to CATOBAR without extensive and expensive modification.
This.
The reason why the British MOD made a red faced “turn back” on the “C” was precisely this one.
From “‘Anyone threatening our air forces will be DESTROYED” (Putin) and “Turkey demonstrates it’s solidarity with the terrorists.” (Lavrov) to “Turkey-Russia negotiating terms of S-400 Triumf sale” in one year and two months!
AH, geopolitics, “plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose”…
And… Why do Turkey needs S400´s?! To fight whom?
My point is more that if we the UK was to allow a deal of 12 Gripen’s with a limited weapons package we can limit the threat
For the foreseable future there´s no threat.
Cheers
Quinta do Noval Nacional Vintage 2001, the best light multi role gen 4.5… Doesnt have DSI, but the nose is fantastic…
But only if the bottle is painted in silver… Much better than a Chateau Dassault (yeah, i know, the chaps at Chateau Dassault dont do fortified fighters, oops, wines).
Absolutely. DDM-NG is not done for that. However, its data are fused (despite Tomcat opinion) inorder to implement tactical situation.
Yes, agree
That is absolutely false, no matter what LM say. Rafale (just example) was esigned for fusion since the origin (and it works without extra tracks appearing. . The whole architecture of the system is done for. Eurofighter also to a lesser extent. Gripen E/F also will.
Correct
Rafale comes close but the body & wing block the view below the aircraft.
The Rafale cant feed images into a helmet like DAVE does, by using a pair of “fish eyes” the French got a huge coverage with just two sensors, but those images are hugely distorted, wich is entirely irrelevant for the job (detecting heat) they do, but are useless to feed into a pilot eyes (the poor chap would feel like he was on drugs).
You can think that Bigfoot (Yeti, whatever) is real and lives in your treehouse, it does not make it accurate. As Sintra stated, as Spud stated, you can look up as a matter of public record in the SAR reports, your opinion is wrong and the facts are as I listed.
FB
The yeti is real, and while looking like… well… awfull… its a dam fine “animal”, i actually had one…
(A Skoda built one)
(Sorry for the offtopic) I´ll get me coat
lol.
their AF is in a tight financial spot, how about F-5 ?
that is one cheap mofo to operate, or perhaps F-50
If they want western equipment, then second hand Vipers or the F/A-50 (or the israeli Kfirs, but that is called “desperation”), if the Argies dont have their mind set on a western system, the JF-17 might be a good alternative. The rest, well, forget it.
Jonesy‘s was one of those posts that make one wish for a ‘like’ button. In its own way my post was intended as a reply/extension, to the point of why the minimum size has gone up, i.e. it’s not a technical evolution, but a political one.
?
It seems technical, by going from an Harrier, wich is roughly the size of an A-4 to an aircraft the size of a Tornado, Dave B, with the weight of a Super Hornet then the aircraft carriers also have to go (way) bigger.
The prosecutor refers to the bankrupcy of SAAB as the reason for the bribe.
If so, the guy´s an idiot!
With the budget of the Fuerza Aerea Argentina, the range of something like a Flanker would be roughly equivalent to the size of the Hangar in wich it would stay…
Please…… His entire premise is wrong from the start. The F-22 may have issues with software upgrades, premature fatigue stress on tails, and inlet ramp damage, but people seem to forget that early blocks weren’t even supposed to be serving as combat coded aircraft in 2017. The commonly repeated myth that F-22 production was discontinued due to: “design faults”, “too expensive” are repeated on this forum often without any supporting documentation or reports. The last proposed production block had a procurement cost below 150 million in TY$.
Those comments just don’t correspond with the actual reasons stated by Gates, JCS, or Congress. The F-22 was cut, quite simply because Gates prioritized weapons that could be used in Iraq and Afghanistan, Congress and the President sustained him. Gates stated that 187 F-22’s would suffice to meet any threat then foreseen (and history has shown his foresight to be flawed).
Entirely correct.
ps – The “Fly Away Unit Cost” (the recurring one) for FY 2006 was 135.322 million US$, had the USAF maintained the Raptor acquisition for, lets say, a decade…
Cheers