no you’re bull.
because it was tested with an aesa radar.

Nicolas was right, it was a test bed for the RBE-2 AESA, the radar was way heavier than the RDI/RDY, that brought severe fligh restrictions to that particular Mirage airframe.
The Mirage 2000 line could not be kept open because there were no orders for it, and Dassault could not maintain an upgrade path for it without a major backer.

It’s settled for good. Radar 2 is coming in 2021. It’s a well established fact that 1 and 1+ are GaAs and 2 is GaN. Show me a radar 3 if you believe otherwise.

There´s one single, very old, public comment made by a not nammed Selex official on a possible GAN AESA dish for CAPTOR-E, that comment was made way before today´s “Radar 1/2/3” development road was on the cards, how that turns out into “there will be a Captor E in 2021 with a Gan Antenna” is anyone´s guess.
You are turning your opinions into facts Lukos.

What do you think: since 1946 which country has participated to the greatests number of wars, killed the greatests number of civilians and changed the greatest number of regimes?

a) USA, b) China (their own by the way), c) Soviet Union (the imposition of Comunist parties across the entire Eastern Europe and their “near abroad” was quite massive).
Your point being?

Just a minor correction: Boeing did not compete in Norway…

Eurofighter did for a while however they left the competition before the final eval because they believed the competition was unfair/biased.

Yep, you are indeed correct.

So provide an example? When I asked for this same claim to be validated 4 months ago no one could provide a single credible example.

Interesting, i remember quite the oposite, severall of us stuck a bucket load of examples of cherry picking, or downright obvious mistakes by the Danish report and your answers/opinions were quite puerile.
I do remember how you´ve dismissed the fact that the Danes used the “Fly Away Unit Cost” (actually they seem to use the very best “FAUC” in the midle of the next decade) in order to calculate the acquisition costs for the F-35A (thats not disputable, its directly written in the report) and then didnt do the same for the Super Hornet. I do remember that you´ve mentioned the SH FMS deal with Australia to suport the Danish report, the obvious answer would be “then why the hell didnt they use the numbers of the three F-35A FMS deals?”. And so on, i could make with ease an entire A4 page with some very questionable assertions on that report. The thing is that it has so many holes in it, that Boeing went to the tribunals with it, something that they didnt do in Japan, Korea or Norway.

By the way, the Danish Defence Minister himself, on the last three months, after the parliament approved the acquisition of the F-35A, made two public comments that destroyed the entire report, a) that the 27 F-35A airframes wouldnt be enough to cover the Danish mission done today by two sqn´s of Vipers and b) that the budget earmarked to acquire those 27 airframes wouldnt be enough… He even tweeted the dam thing (the last one he took it out). Thats a pair of bullets right through that report.

Right now its in court, its up to the judges, interesting times ahead.

Cheers

The main reason why almost every 4th generation has a twin seater and the 5th ones dont is because the RCS management would have gone T***s up in these last ones.
A fourth generation twin seater is a fully combat capable aircraft, wich by the way also acts has a very high end trainer, you cant do that with a fifth generation fighter because sticking another hole in the airframe would throw the entire RCS LO equation to Ouagadougou. Top that with the reasons that Spud have already listed and “presto”, no twin stickers for Raptors, Pak´s, etc.