F-35A range of flight 1850 – 2100 km, radius 35% range 650 – 735 km
Those numbers are wrong by a very wide margin.
May i ask where the numbers (clean weight and fuel capacity) to calculate the fuel fraction of the PAK FA came from?
You make it sounds like the US has a F-15 sized fleet of F-22 and readily available for deployment at all times. But no, they don’t.
Really? I “make it sounds like the US has a F-15 sized fleet of F-22 and readily available for deployment at all times”?! When did i do that?
And me thinking that the USAF fields roughly 120 combat coded Raptors, plus another roughly sixty block 10 units, wich are used for training. How many SU-27/SU-35´s fields the VVS today in active regiments?
This is exactly why they don’t give a hoot. They have developed measures against it, and thats the beauty of technology; peer states have caught up with ways to detect and deal with stealth, reducing the impact of a plane like the F-22. That’s also falls under deterrance, bub, as it is a two way street.
Either Russia doesnt “give a hoot” and ignores the Raptor or Russia “gives a hoot” and spends several billions US$ for two decades countering the dam thing, wich, by the words of an ungodly number of high ranking VVS officials and Industry chaps they did. End of story
It might have been the “be all, end all” in the late 90’s and early 2000’s, but not anymore,
OH! We have here an expert with access to classified information on the ATF, JSF, S400 and PAKFA programs! Why didnt you said so? Hell, most of us around here just read the specialiazed press for a few decades.
I am going to be blunt, you have the exact same information that i do. Your information on (lets say) the NEZ of a 9M96 versus a Raptor is zilch, nothing, nada, zero.
Sadly for the F-22, the F-35’s lobby and the political games in the US, has made sure it’s deterrence value is lost faster than usual.
The Raptor “IOC”ed in June 2006, the F-15A did the same in 1976, compare the entry service dates for their Russian equivalents, the PAK-FA and the SU-27.
At the end of the day, I’d say the B-2 and the B-21 are bigger worries for the Russians than the F-22 will ever be again.
The B2? The B-21?
There are twenty of them! With luck the USAF could put ten of the ******s flying at the same time. Right now, between the Raptor and DAVE there are around 350 airframes, untill the first B-21 gets to the sqn´s there will be around 1200/1400 F-22/35 airframes with the USAF.
Deterrence against the US as a whole and other peer states. You make it sounds like the T-50 and J-20 existance is only to copy the US and the F-22, in a very narrow and self-centered point of view.
“self-centered”? I am Portuguese, i dont have a dog in this fight.
It is even more obvious both China and Russia have different thing in mind than the F-22, when both planes have a more wider roles and capabilities from the get-go than the Raptor.
They will? Again that story about classified information.
Nevermind that the Russians have portrayed the PAK-FA has Raptor and Dave “killer” again, and again, and again, and again. How many Russian articles quoting the likes of Mikhail Pogosyan (or the last, lets say, three VVS bosses, good old Gen. Aleksandr Zelin by example) comparing the PAK-FA with the Raptor do you want? Google it, try “Pogosyan F-22″…
Thing is, a lot of people are still stuck with the 90’s F-22 propaganda push, that it could wipe out everything under the sun. It might been true 15 years ago, but nowadays is quickly becoming as impactful in the battlefield as an F-117 would be today…
And where did i mentioned that the Raptor could “wipe out everything under the sun”?
Last time i´ve checked every time that one of our most ardent american friends around here started with that talk i´ve ended up stucking photos of several Luftwaffe Phoons carrying quite a number of raptor kill marks… Ask the likes of Hopsalot, Spud or BIO.
What i´ve said is that the Raptor was built has a deterrent versus peer and near peer adversaries, that it worked its obvious, or else the Russians and the Chinese wouldnt have been throwing billions upon billions trying to counter it for the last two decades.
Deterrence against who, exactly?.
Jihadist don’t give a hoot about the F-22 and Russia doesn’t either, but for different reasons.
And for anything in between the two, the CVNs and LHD are higher on the list of deterrence than the F-22s…
Deterrence against who?
Russia, China and (once upon a time) Iran, or any other peer or near peer country that happens to be at ods with the US Foreign Policy for the next twenty five years.
On the bit about the “Jihadist don’t give a hoot about the F-22”, well there´s a reason why the Pentagon fields around five hundred Reapers, Predators and Grey Eagles, it has something to do with fanatical bearded idiots with Kalashnikov´s and Technical´s, on the “and Russia doesn’t either” bit, sorry you are entirely wrong. For the last two decades severall VVS high ranking chaps have publicly comented on the Raptor on top of that the development of the Sukhoi T-50 entirely dispels the idea that the VVS doesnt “give a hoot about the F-22”, they do. With the amount of money they are throwing at Double Digit SAM´s and the T-50 they clearly “give a hoot”…
The F-22s were designed for a war and a world that no longer exists.
Warn the Russians and the Chinese, they didnt get the memo, or else the T-50 and the J-20 are being developed for what?
yes, but neither has the mass of US, nor all the support/special a/c, to say nothing of USN that will decide entirely
over chinese shipping
I really wouldnt discount the Chinese building several hundreds of J-20´s for the next two and a half decades.
Pak-Fa and Y-20 would like a word….
Hmmmmmmmmm
[ATTACH=CONFIG]247786[/ATTACH]
I´ll get me hat 🙂
could have made a specialized first attack stealth jet in small numbers. Then just use the F 15e for everything else.
Might has well have built enough Raptors to replace the entire “C” and “D” Eagle Fleet (and the Wild Weasel Vipers) and keep the Viper production line churning eighty of them a year. The USAF would have been in a much, much better place today.
Do they?
Yes
there was nothing to deter when f-22 entered service, and there wont be anything to deter before the f-22 retires,
besides that, sortie rate is abysmal so if a war was going to start today, f-22 would be the least useful a/c in USAF inventory
1) The Raptor is slated to retire in the 2040´s
2) The VVS and the PLAAF ordered the T-50 and the J-20, comparable aircrafts to the Raptor
This thread seems like a topic that has been recycled over and again. The flight manuals for the: F-16CJ, F-16A, F-15E, F-15C, some E-M diagrams for Mig-29, Su-27 are available. There are not, hopefully won’t be for some time, flight manuals for the likes of Rafale, Typhoon available.
These types of comparisons lead to non-productive p*ssing contests.
X2
nah…F-22 hasnt done squat for USAF beside costing money so that definitely disproves your point
Its called deterrence, and the problem with the Raptor is that they didnt build enough of the ******s.
I guess I would rather believe a stick jockey than computer key board jockeys that post here.
Warn the USAF, the RAF, the IDF/AF and all those other western air forces who have bought the dam thing…
You can have a discussion about costs related to the JSF program (we have debated that ad nauseum, and god knows that i´ve “sticked” the cost argument into the JSF program an huge number of times) but dont do that based on a tweet of a 93 year old (very, very, very respectable) chap, at least not without hard data.
their timing was exceptionally bad, just like with F-35,
hopefully the customers can just add the difference and get an up-to-snuff GaN before receiving the fighters
The timing of virtualy everyone with contracted fighters… I am not aware of one single fighter program wich has one single GAN AESA radar antenna contracted.
Or will it repeat the MMRCA cost based death spiral by chasing the most advanced AESA technology that hasn’t been proven and is currently extraordinarily expensive?
?!
Just to be clear the kill ratio in question (against the F-15) was not from Red Flag but from a different deployment with the F-35A.
the 24-0 statement comes from the USMC and from what I have been able to look up, does not claim it was a ‘dogfight’ or identify the types of targets (air or ground defense systems for example) whereas the first Hill deployment specifically mentioned F-15E’s, and air to air.
Thanks