Page 2 – Key Publishing

docrjay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)

← 1 2 3 →

Author

Posts
January 16, 2005 at 7:16 am in reply to: Which aircraft….. #2612862

docrjay
Participant

Yup i cut it out on a F-18 pic C/D version.
i just wanna know what other aircraft could carry this pylon.

January 16, 2005 at 6:08 am in reply to: Your Favorite Warship? #2062649

docrjay
Participant

My vote goes to the Dutch LCF and Absalon of the RDN.

But my favorite for our navy would be the Type 621 multi-purpose corvette….she’s a beauty

January 11, 2005 at 12:29 am in reply to: Cougar vs Black Hawk #2615194

docrjay
Participant

This is a very interesting comparison. There should be a perfectly capable helicopter out there that can do medium lift in both peacetime and wartime scenarios. But I like the versatility of the Blackhawk. I agree it is truly a wartime helicopter. But for the most part in an AF it would do peacetime duties. I think the Blackhawk wins this comparison.

Just a question, isnt the Dauphin a medium lift helicopter also? Can it be compared to the two?

January 8, 2005 at 1:22 am in reply to: Vosper 69m "Super Vita II" #2063430

docrjay
Participant

Try this one
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/hellenic/

December 14, 2004 at 3:05 pm in reply to: KAI T-50/A-50 #2635821

docrjay
Participant

Include the F-50 too. Impressive load. Great multi-role fighter.

October 23, 2004 at 9:06 am in reply to: First export Gripens! #2623622

docrjay
Participant

If Americans would veto AMRAAM for the Gripen. Can MICA be a substitute? I read somewhere that Ericcson and Matra had an agreement before that can markets MICA for the Gripen. ANy comments?

October 23, 2004 at 1:48 am in reply to: Potential for the A-50/F-50 Golden Eagle? #2623707

docrjay
Participant

What about the RC-400– Mica combination for the A-50? This would be possible right?
Get 12 JAS 39 C/D Gripen doing dedicated A2A and 24 of the A-50 doing A2G and antishipping and secondary A2A with MICA BVR. This would be a potent force. A total of 36 aircraft all multirole. Give it tanker support and a couple of Erieye AWACS. Nice…….

October 13, 2004 at 5:08 pm in reply to: Searchwater 2000 fixed wing application (now with pic) #2630213

docrjay
Participant

Yup. But it was the old version. I think it does not have C2, datalinks and JTIDS and a combat system. The one sold to China was just the radar.

The Searchwater 2000 has C2, datalinks, improved radar qualities — range, countermeasures, and has an actual combat system (CEREBRUS) for raid assesment, over-land detection, anti-clutter etc….

Heres the a link
www-v3.thalesgroup.com/all/pdf/ searchwater2000aew.pdf

October 13, 2004 at 4:45 pm in reply to: Searchwater 2000 fixed wing application (now with pic) #2630257

docrjay
Participant

The atlantiques have i believe a surface search radar exclusively for maritime detection not as AEW. The Searchwater 2000 AEW with the Cerebrus combat system is the one Iam driving at. It is designed as an AEW&C with datalink and JTIDS. This radar also can do maritime surface search as secondary role but without SAR capability.

October 10, 2004 at 11:05 am in reply to: Searchwater 2000 fixed wing application #2632331

docrjay
Participant

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/ Launchpad/7763/pdf/searchwater.pdf

October 10, 2004 at 11:03 am in reply to: Searchwater 2000 fixed wing application #2632334

docrjay
Participant

Sorry the file is too large. I have a link, its a thales brochure, on the 1st page lower left corner. Im so sorry…..

October 10, 2004 at 10:56 am in reply to: Searchwater 2000 fixed wing application #2632343

docrjay
Participant

Dude sorry, have a problem attaching the pic.

September 20, 2004 at 9:33 am in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2644376

docrjay
Participant

Just a quick question on the Kfir C10. Does it have the 2 extra pylons in the fuselage near the air intakes? Can these pylons carry AAM’s?

Thanks..

July 24, 2004 at 12:52 pm in reply to: Active Phase Target Illumination Radar any advantage? #2075368

docrjay
Participant

Ei guys any answers? :confused:

December 12, 2003 at 1:52 pm in reply to: Area defense #2691064

docrjay
Participant

Ei Steve,

Sorry for my naïve impressions. Thanks again for the info…
But 1 more question for the Arabel. Have you heard of the new KDX II AAW frigates of the ROK Navy? Its equipped with MW-08 as its 3D radar (target indicator) & 2 STIR illuminators. Given that you said ARABEL can do illumination duties for the ESSM and possibly SM2 with software modifications will it be a good match or upgrade? And yes the Thales website categorizes ARABEL as a fire control radar why did you say that it is s reliant on shipboard illuminators when it can do exactly that?(missile uplink and illumination)
I agree that the ARABEL is good for local area defense because of its horizon- range-only detection capability. But if it paired with a modern long range 3D radar set like SMART-L will it be a good match. Most of the missiles even the SM2 has about 70-80 kms range (which is also the effective instrumented range of the ARABEL), with a good cue from a dedicated air/surface search like SMART-L Arabel can probably steer these missiles accurately even up to ten simultaneous engagements.
Sorry you might find it insisting, but I’ll be satisfied with any reply from you…I know you know well enough to quell my curiosity…

Thanks chief……
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)

← 1 2 3 →