dark light

exmpa

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 299 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Local Council Threat To Kemble Airfield #1243899
    exmpa
    Participant

    Perhaps the ex RAF pilot (a Group Captain no less) only flew gliders. That would be the only logical explanation.

    All nimbys should have their passports stamped NOT TO FLY ABROAD ON HOLIDAY – SHIP ONLY.

    So let me see if I’ve got this right. Because the ex-RAF pilot flew military aircraft in the course of his duties for the purposes of operations or essential training, and these aircraft that made noise, then he is not entitled to object to the noise made by aircraft operated for the purposes of general aviation, not in connection with a storage or maintenance facility or for the purposes of public transport.

    Please explain the relevance of “NOT TO FLY ABROAD ON HOLIDAY – SHIP ONLY” Kemble is not operating flights for the purposes of public transport is it? The “ex-RAF pilot” is not objecting to an airport. I don’t understand, please enlighten me.

    Along with others I recently objected to planning permission for a caravan park in the village I live in. The site was inadequate and the position inappropriate. As it happens the council agreed and permission was refused. Does that mean I cannot go on holiday in a caravan? Not that I want to.

    I look forward to your reply.

    exmpa

    in reply to: Local Council Threat To Kemble Airfield #1244359
    exmpa
    Participant

    Perhaps you may also wish to expand on this statement?

    I recall that down at Lee-on-Solent we had complaints about running up the FRADU Hunters after dark, this in winter so not that late. A letter duley arrived which gave us a clue as to where this moaner lived. Next time we ran one up we pointed the aircraft in the appropriate direction and ‘accidently’ switched on the newly fitted Harley light.

    What a wonderful way to further the interests of the service and foster good relations with the local population.

    exmpa

    in reply to: Local Council Threat To Kemble Airfield #1244581
    exmpa
    Participant

    I am appalled that one of the complainants is an ex-RAF pilot

    I am sorry, but I don’t understand the relevance of that sentence. Could you please explain why an ex-RAF pilot shouldn’t complain about aircraft noise.

    exmpa

    Also an ex-RAF pilot

    in reply to: bmi takeover? #549243
    exmpa
    Participant

    I think I see a story about a Bmi sell-off every year. Sir MB is 65 so I reckon it will be within 10 years.

    Yes, that’s about right. For years it has been confident predictions from the financial scribblers that a stock market flotation was bound to occur within the next 12/18/24 months or that SAS, Lufthansa or an unnamed middle east airline was going to buy British Midland. Or, it was the recurring theme that Sir Richard would be the new owner, except he just seems to be a little short of the cash to complete the deal at the moment…..

    The facts are:

    SMB is Chairman of British Midland – that’s what he does, that’s what he is.
    He is 65 and he will have to stop sometime.
    When that “sometime” comes he will sell – but there is still the matter of the “Lufthansa first refusal”.
    He might not bother and just leave it all to the D’Oyly Carte Opera Company.

    Then again, BA might just offer him the chairmanship, there’s a thought!

    Lord King would have a good chuckle about that.

    exmpa

    in reply to: bmi takeover? #549262
    exmpa
    Participant

    plotting a billion-pound takeover of bmi

    They don’t have to “plot” anything. All BA has to do so is make Sir Michael a satisfactory offer. British Midland Airways (bmi is the brand) is a private company, it’s not a case of buying shares on the stockmarket, you have to buy them from the principals. In this case Lufthansa, SAS and Sir Michael Bishop. Inconveniently SMB holds 50% plus 1 share, so in the end it’s up to him and him alone.

    Look at it this way; SMB is “Sir Michael Bishop Chairman of British Midland”. If he sells then he’s just another rich geezer. One day he will realise his assets, but is this the day? You would have to ask him.

    exmpa

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1261617
    exmpa
    Participant

    they didn’t use Red Shrimp at all, relying on the pylon-mounted Dash 10 ECM

    If you read Pontius’ post again you will see that he is only describing the coverage of the equipment comprising the fixed ECM suite. He is not commenting on its tactical employment on a particular mission.

    Red Shrimp was a fairly basic (but powerful) barrage jammer, it had its uses but certainly not against the type of emitters in the Port Stanley area. The I-band jammer (X-band dependent on your age!) certainly covered the spectrum utilised by the AAA FC radars, but it was optimised against Soviet AI radars. The Janus aerial mod Pontius refers to was intended for use at low level against ground based radars Its performance at 10-16000′ against the Superfledermaus would have been questionable. Hence the decision to fit the -10 pod which was far better suited to the operational environment.

    exmpa

    in reply to: amunition query #1271544
    exmpa
    Participant

    RG stands for Radway Green, manufacturer of ammunition, not sure what the 80 denotes, could be year of manufacture

    JC,

    You are correct in your surmise. “80” is the year of manufacture.

    exmpa

    in reply to: What is a configuration issue? #581853
    exmpa
    Participant

    Config Warnings

    The Takeoff Config Warning on single aisle Airbus aircraft is triggered by the following:

    SLATS/FLAPS NOT IN TO CONFIG

    PITCH TRIM NOT IN TO RANGE

    RUD TRIM NOT IN TO RANGE

    SPD BRK NOT RETRACTED

    SIDESTICK FAULT

    BRAKES HOT

    DOORS

    ENG 1(2) OIL LO TEMP

    PARK BRAKE ON

    FLEX TEMP NOT SET

    exmpa

    in reply to: Source for bullets? #1299242
    exmpa
    Participant

    A carpentry workshop should be able to turn out as many as you require, a tin of spray paint does the rest. Should be cheaper than other options.

    exmpa

    in reply to: Ground speed limits at airports #514609
    exmpa
    Participant

    Most airports have a speed restiction on taxiways of 15kts .

    I know of CDG that has 30kts for there long straight taxiways others may also have them.

    Very interesting, could you give the references for those statements please? Do they come from the AIP and are they reproduced on the appropriate Thales/Aerad plates or Jeppesen?

    exmpa

    in reply to: Ground speed limits at airports #514920
    exmpa
    Participant

    Let’s just clarify this one a bit:

    As I said above, I know of no airport imposed taxy speed limits at any airport I have operated from in Western Europe, Middle East, Far East, Oceania or North America throughout the last 40 or so years. That includes Amsterdam, Schipol which I first visited when it was under construction in 1965.

    If anyone “knows” of a specific airport taxy speed limit (as opposed to something like “Speed should be restricted to walking pace in the parking area”) and can produce the reference for it, the I’ll have seen something new. But then, things change all the time.

    Deano, you use the FMC, GPS, IRU displayed Groundspeed . If you haven’t got 2 out of those 3 you’re not going to be there anyway. You wouldn’t satisy BRNav requirements without them.

    exmpa

    in reply to: Ground speed limits at airports #515091
    exmpa
    Participant

    I have once heard that the official speed limit is 50 kph.

    As speed is displayed in Knots not Kilometres/Hour it would seem a bit unlikely wouldn’t it?

    exmpa

    in reply to: Ground speed limits at airports #515121
    exmpa
    Participant

    I know of no airport imposed taxy speed limits. Taxy speeds are normally defined by structural/fatigue considerations and a typical figure would be 30 Knots. In certain circumstances you might taxy faster, e.g. back tracking to the takeoff position.

    Companies may set their own limits for taxy speeds and flag exceedances on the Flight Data Recorder. Should any particular airport appear to be generating a high level of exceedances then the cause would be sought and measures introduced to lower the incidence of these events.

    By the “Polderbaan” I assume you mean 18R? – It’s so far away from Amsterdam Ryanair are thinking of using it.

    exmpa

    in reply to: Nimrod Down #1310403
    exmpa
    Participant

    I was on 51Sqn in the days when we had a real enemy.

    A different one LesB, I feel that the current one is just as real.

    One of the crew of the 120 Sqn aircraft, Flt Sgt Adrian “Ady” Davis, was on 51 with me late ’80s. A good bloke and first class F Eng.

    Were you “A” or “C”?

    Rgds
    exmpa

    in reply to: Nimrod Down #1311134
    exmpa
    Participant

    MOD have released the names as:

    Flt Lt Steven Johnson
    Flt Lt Leigh Anthony Mitchelmore
    Flt Lt Gareth Rodney Nicholas
    Flt Lt Allan James Squires
    Flt Lt Steven Swarbrick

    FS Gary Wayne Andrews
    FS Stephen Beattie
    FS Gerard Martin Bell
    FS Adrian Davis

    Sgt Benjamin James Knight
    Sgt John Joseph Langton
    Sgt Gary Paul Quilliam

    L Cpl Oliver Simon Dicketts, Parachute Regiment
    Mne Joseph David Windall, Royal Marines

    RIP

    exmpa

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 299 total)