dark light

joe_dempsey_UK

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: These wreckages were once…..? #2682776
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Thanks for proving me right old buddy =)

    Originally posted by flex297
    Don’t listen to them, buddy, forget what they say.. This should be a MiG-29? That is darn ridiculous…

    The rear portion clearly shows MiG-25 style fin. The wheels are way too large for a Fulcrum. Last but not least is the single-wing air brake which came with later versions of MiG-29 (M and K) but not with the basic 9.12. Wings have straight tips rather than rounded that come with the Fulcrum.

    The front portion is apparently the same aircraft, which has been torn apart. No sign of LERX can be seen. The anti-glare stripe is not straight as with all MiG-29s, it is broke and angled. Only MiG-25 recon, trainer and Wild Weasels used this style of anti-glare stripe.

    The radome reminds me of interceptor MiG-25P or MiG-25PD series, the open panels, however, point more towards Wild Weasel MiG-25BM versions.

    A MiG-29 is out of question here..

    This particular a/c sports the number 25201. In IrAF list, all No. 25xxx are listed as MiG-25s, MiG-29s use numbers 29xxx… PD and P interceptor series got 254xx, recon machines have 251xx, 252xx could be Wild Weasels (not confirmed).

    BTW, acig.org lists #25201 as Kilter capable MiG-25BM radar killer. That is what I think, too….

    Need any more proofs?

    in reply to: These wreckages were once…..? #2683112
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Re: These wreckages were once…..?

    Originally posted by Vaiar
    Fill in the dots please. It is Iraq BTW.

    http://www.defence.gov.au/opfalconer/images/gallery/090503b/JPAU18APR03JC13_lo.jpg

    The rear portion looks alot more like a mig-25 than a Mig-29!

    in reply to: Its the Falklands again #2687704
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    while UK Navy got their SHAR FA2.

    ……and are now loosing it 🙁

    in reply to: Wind tunnel photos #2689219
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    From the front view it looks very like the German stealth design that was photographed in a hanger a number of years ago and featured in AFM.

    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Yep a fake.

    Here is the original:

    http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/aircraft/trainer/jl9_3.jpg

    Looking at it I would think that it was based on a FT-7 rather then a normal F-7:

    – Has the enlarged ventral stabs
    – Larger spine
    – Twin seat arrnagement.

    (The last two do not suggest an exact FT-7 traits merely suggestion of using an FT-7 as a basis)

    in reply to: Whatever happened to FOAS? #2694871
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Originally posted by Gavin.O
    Joe, can you explain what the “assesement phase” will include? Are we talking about wind tunnel models? Or just trade studies? I assume it DOESN”T mean prototype constuction … but maybe large-scale mockups?

    –Gavin.

    Good question Gavin………and one I don’t know the answer to!

    Would guess that it will involve the practical experimentation with a number of possible systems

    On the U(C)AV front such experiments would involve the practicalities of thier operation, the network needed and also thier inoperability with manned platforms, ie. operating from.

    Also the MoD are becoming increasingly interested in the X-45, so something may happen with that.
    Just a thought.

    in reply to: Night Owls???? #2694882
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Originally posted by Arthur
    Isn’t that the Varyag?

    Just did abit of researching…….

    Yep definately the Varyag

    Wonder if the are installing pool tables or SSMs?

    in reply to: Night Owls???? #2694901
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    What is that????

    Looks like a carrier, anyone got anything more on it?

    – Joe

    in reply to: Whatever happened to FOAS? #2694907
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    The FOAS requirement still exists.

    Neither the JSF or Typhoon wil be able to fill the Deep Strike capability gap that will result from the GR.4 retirement.

    The MoD still have it on their site and it has even been updated as recently as last month.

    It is very hard to say what FOAS will look like, the compenents being considered are manned aircraft, UCAV and cruise along with supporting network systems. It is quite possible a combination will be evaluated.

    The plan is the move from the concept phase into the assesment phase any time now, with the nominal in service date being around 2017.

    – Joe

    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Can’t beleive nobody answered this fully:

    c- RAF
    It is the HS125, but that’s not the designation it flies with in the RAF. The RAF Jetstreams aren not for nav training, the Navy ones are (sometimes).

    Dominie

    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    -1- What aircraft, developed in international programs, are in use with the British military?

    Merlin
    Lynx
    Gazelle
    Puma

    Jaguar
    Tornado
    Typhoon
    Harrier GR.7

    Not including Liscencesd built aircraft though

    What apout the Eurocopter Squirrel?

    – Joe

    in reply to: Tornado Gr4 #2664152
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Since the withdrawal from service of the WE177 nuclear bomb in 1998, the Tornado strike capability is restricted to conventional weapons.

    What happened to them though. Would it be reasonably accurate to assume that they are still kept safely in reserve.

    In times of war, where nuclear weapons could be used, is it safe to assume that they could re-enter service?

    – Joe

    in reply to: Tornado Gr4 #2664156
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Originally posted by Distiller
    HMS Vanguard, Victorious, Vigilant, Vengeance (no Victor-Vulcan-Valiant here ;-). Each carries 16 Trident II D-5, range 4000-6000nm, up to 14 (usually 8) W-88 thermonuclear warheads (in Mk.5 RV with the dimensions 6ft x 22in, yield 475kT (30x Hiroshima), CEP better than 300ft).

    I remember hearing that it no longer sails with a full complement of missiles.

    in reply to: India Hypersonic Plane #2678262
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    Max life: 100 flights.

    Err………this doesn’t seem very practical!!!!!

    in reply to: Top 5 World Airforces in 2020(General predictions) #2689816
    joe_dempsey_UK
    Participant

    150 JSF for a country who will operate a likely tiny CVF able to operate 20 JSF at best!

    There is a strong possibility that this will be erduced to approximately 110.

    Might I remind you that there will be TWO MEDIUM sized carriers, even if they are getting smaller daily.

    Also remember the JSF will be replacing all RAF Harriers.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)