dark light

JamesA

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Singapore Airlines B747 upper deck artwork #811202
    JamesA
    Participant

    Many thanks, Mike. I will have a chase around. Apologies for the delay, old computer wouldn’t recognise the site.
    Stay lucky
    J

    in reply to: Cosford's Sea Balliol #1105793
    JamesA
    Participant

    Last RAF Balliol

    Circa 1980, I collected a Balliol from Henlow and took it to Cosford and reassembled it beside the TSR2. I am certain it was not a WAFU machine, but maybe the experts can correct me.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351664
    JamesA
    Participant

    Where did the information stating the type of explosive come from? Was it official or more sensationalism from the journos? It is not official SOP to divulge such information so soon after such an incident.
    PETN needs a detonator, not matches to explode.
    So, to another theory – was this a set up by security services to have a device which would fail, but create enough fear among pax and be suitably fed by the press to ensure additional funds, and the inevitable knee jerking as has happened, to give the security industry more powers and cash, just a thought. Or, was our man so keen to get in to the US he didn’t forsee the consequences of his actions, again knowing the ‘device’ would not explode. Remember his line of study in London and Allah knows what in The Yemen.

    in reply to: Attempted mid air bombing in Detriot? #1918821
    JamesA
    Participant

    Where did the information stating the type of explosive come from? Was it official or more sensationalism from the journos? It is not official SOP to divulge such information so soon after such an incident.
    PETN needs a detonator, not matches to explode.
    So, to another theory – was this a set up by security services to have a device which would fail, but create enough fear among pax and be suitably fed by the press to ensure additional funds, and the inevitable knee jerking as has happened, to give the security industry more powers and cash, just a thought. Or, was our man so keen to get in to the US he didn’t forsee the consequences of his actions, again knowing the ‘device’ would not explode. Remember his line of study in London and Allah knows what in The Yemen.

    in reply to: TSR2 bases and units #1158931
    JamesA
    Participant

    After following the thread drift, I found it quite an interesting exchange of views over what was considered at the time ‘the Aircraft’ for the R. A. F. Quite a number of the contributors come over as being, if not anti-British aero- industry then very pro-U.S.

    However, I found some naivety regarding the political views and the costs of the aircraft referred to. Namely, every U. S. model was always offered to the British government ‘as an absolute bargain’. If this was quoting from an M.P. it shows the ‘political speak’ i.e. lies coming over. Remember, at this time B.O.A.C. was in government hands, so they were very aware of the American pricing system, i.e. ‘Buy our airplane, you can have it next week. See how low the cost is and how attractive the payment terms are.’ I won’t get in to development costs here. At no time has any British manufacturer been able to offer terms to equal those of the U.S., either financing or delivery. The U.S. make their money (profits), on sale of spares. This is well known to the commercial world and I imagine in various government circles for military purchases, if only after the contract has been signed.

    One person claims many contracts coming in within budget, weapons maybe, I cannot recall one aircraft doing this, but I am prepared to stand corrected. No aircraft has ever been built to its original proposal as times have meant extra functions or equipment being required during development. Hence price has to increase, I would not blame any company refusing to build to a fixed price under these circumstances.

    A couple of you have mentioned ‘MRCA’ before it became Tornado. Does anyone recall the Luftwaffe’s interpretation of this – ‘Military Requirements Come Afterwards’. ‘In other words after the politicians have finished, we get what is left over.’ Not an unfamiliar situation, I think in the R.A.F. with aircraft being adapted for roles they were not designed for. ‘But, you have to realise money is tight, etc. etc.’

    F/A 18RN – your mention of Russia’s finest, I was given to believe after Vickers gave assistance to get the Il-62 in to the air, they deliberately led the KGB astray with the Tu-144. Hence, its poor performance. Probably just another aero-story, but as Chox keeps reminding us, ‘it makes for more interesting reading.’

    in reply to: General Discussion #324124
    JamesA
    Participant

    Lest we forget

    It is a sad moment when anybody dies from whatever cause, but I question the hysteria created by the world’s press over a pop-star.

    Steve Rowell notes an MJ big fan at the White House. Congress holds a moment of silence for an entertainer. The world goes wild with grief.

    How about a ‘moment of silence’ for all the troops who have died and are still dying in Afghanistan and Iraq in order we are able to have our freedom to live our comfortable lives. Have not these men and women given that much more?

    in reply to: Michael Jackson dies from a heart attack #1903960
    JamesA
    Participant

    Lest we forget

    It is a sad moment when anybody dies from whatever cause, but I question the hysteria created by the world’s press over a pop-star.

    Steve Rowell notes an MJ big fan at the White House. Congress holds a moment of silence for an entertainer. The world goes wild with grief.

    How about a ‘moment of silence’ for all the troops who have died and are still dying in Afghanistan and Iraq in order we are able to have our freedom to live our comfortable lives. Have not these men and women given that much more?

    in reply to: Ryanair hikes check-in fees! #552961
    JamesA
    Participant

    Cloud 9
    There is no end to extra charges, e.g. ‘Sir/Madam, would you like to reserve your life jacket now for only xxx, or take a chance in the unlikely event of a ditching leasing one for zzz.
    Then how about a surcharge to sit by an emergency exit.
    Or reserve your place in a liferaft.
    Imagination is a wonderful thing.

    On a serious note – How many passengers, even on full fare carriers, take note of the weight limitation of the overhead bins. I hate to think of the damage to humans in event of an accident when these grossly overloaded lockers break open and the contents land on the pax. I have seen the results following a crash, many more would probably got out had they not been injured, knocked unconcious or killed by falling luggage. If you calculate one bin per six pax, then if memory serves correctly, you may place about 5 kilos each to remain within the safe limits. I have often seen reasonably fit looking people struggling to get a bag above their heads to get it in. The flight attendants ignore sizes and weights as they don’t want negative comments to the company or more likely personal abuse. The ‘pay for checked baggage’ will encourage overloading of these bins, as some correspondents have stated they have carried up to 15 kilos on board. I like to think they would place said bag under the seat, but I guarantee it went into the overhead, if they were in time to get space.

    in reply to: Dutch journalist smuggles fake bomb at Schiphol #552968
    JamesA
    Participant

    Why go airside?

    Pauldyson,
    To answer your question, it has already been done. If I remember correctly in Rome some years ago. I forget the group involved, but they ran amok shooting indiscriminately in the main hall. I cannot imagine the police being able to use their weapons in a crowded terminal for fear of hitting moving pax, so their hands are somewhat tied to respond.

    As regards other contributions to this thread – Shamrock – we could all take banned items through, or at least try to. It is remarks like yours which encourage journos to try it on and then boast about it. IMHO, if that man was a real professional, he would do his deed and then go to the authorities to show the weaknesses in the system, not boast to the world how great he is. Thereby encouraging those who wish to cause harm to copycat his method. It could just be because of his kind I have greater restrictions placed on me when operating through AMS.

    in reply to: Hilarious Mistakes On Screen #1246868
    JamesA
    Participant

    Newforest,
    This was shot at Bovingdon, I was serving there and was able to wander over to the Mosquitos. There is also a row of Ansons in the early sequences.
    Happy days when the British still had an air force.

    in reply to: How "stable" are 63 year old bombs? #1272430
    JamesA
    Participant

    Earth movement

    Something this ‘wonder’ council does not appear to have taken into account is natural movement of the earth. I live in Limburg and have found bits of spent munitions from WWll which have come to the surface over the years. I can imagine the instant panic if this Mosquito breaks through the surface one day.
    I used to work at Schiphol Airport and remember when excavation was being done for a new hangar. If I recall correctly, several uxbs were found. The clearance included on-site detonations, which required all personnel being sent away for some time whilst the Bomb Disposal Team did the business. Made a lot of people in the other hangars think when they dropped tools.
    Also, with regard to the break down of old munitions. Some years ago I met a Royal Navy mine disposal officer, who told me he had been called to a mine snagged in a fisherman’s net. It had been placed by the Germans during the war and some forty years later, the six month life battery showed itself to be at peak capacity. So much for natural decaying.
    I wouldn’t be very happy living in the houses shown in the picture and we can all guess who those residents will be voting for at the next local elections.
    Good luck with the campaign BW Roger
    JamesA

    in reply to: Death of an F-14 #1309203
    JamesA
    Participant

    No Tomcats for Iran

    It is all a cunning sales ploy. Watch Lockheed and /or Boeing move in and sell NEW now there is nothing second hand for anyone to buy. Even the U. S. government admits they cannot account for half the weapons they have given Iraqis, obviously no sales receipts.

    in reply to: Guess Whats Wrong with this Pic? #545014
    JamesA
    Participant

    Signwriters can’t spell ??????????

    In addition to the foregoing observations, I noticed the name has two ‘t’ s.
    Perhaps that is how the Aussies spell it but, I would have thought with their English ancestery they would have stuck to one.

    in reply to: General Discussion #345329
    JamesA
    Participant

    Gentlemen and Ladies,
    The taste of Marmite can be likened to Guinness and Branston Pickle. None can be defined in words. You have to taste first and you either like it or you must keep tasting until you have developed the tase buds, then you will tell everybody there ids nothing that can hold a candle to it.
    Back to my next test batch of Liffey water.

    in reply to: The Great Marmite debate!!! #1943442
    JamesA
    Participant

    Gentlemen and Ladies,
    The taste of Marmite can be likened to Guinness and Branston Pickle. None can be defined in words. You have to taste first and you either like it or you must keep tasting until you have developed the tase buds, then you will tell everybody there ids nothing that can hold a candle to it.
    Back to my next test batch of Liffey water.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)