dark light

TempestNut

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 453 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The death knell for many UK aviation events? #854904
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Is this a more than irrational response to the events at Shoreham ?

    Its the way of the modern world. We all know that road accidents happen, and boating accidents and worst of all war, yet one off tragedies such as Shoreham attract a disproportionate response. I haven’t seen any news about the cause so perhaps I’m being a little blasé about what is an appropriate response. Charging organisers more will not prevent another accident though. And perhaps the CAA has forgotten we all have enough stolen in taxes each year for them to just get on and do their job. To me this will punish the public and send our historic aircraft overseas. I do think that Shoreham as a venue may be finished.

    in reply to: Flying Legends all-ticket for 2016 #885383
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Well I think advance sales suck. Going to be a lot of people not come. I think I might go to Yeovilton instead.

    in reply to: Data plate: What would 5mil build you today? #899589
    TempestNut
    Participant

    I suppose a Wellington bomber is out of the price range.

    Maybe not as the MkII was Merlin powered and the MKIV Twin Wasp powered so engines would not be an issue which is why many aircraft become too costly to restore (everything is relative of coarse). A coastal command Wellington would be a fitting spend.

    TempestNut
    Participant

    Modern short run manufacturing is now eminently viable for almost any component, including cranks and cams heads and blocks. Its just a matter for the manufacturer to be certified by the CAA for airworthy purposes. I’m not sure how RR cast all the Merlin cylinder heads, but with an original and todays materials and methods any replacement would no doubt be better than the original war-time product. I’m picking that any “new heads” would be of the same material as the original and cast in a way to give the new head the same properties as the original so as not to introduce any unintended changes to the engines that could result in an inflight failure.

    in reply to: Biggin Hill Mosquito! #918270
    TempestNut
    Participant

    As I understand it the 190 Replicas are very different in construction from the real thing, built as they were to be armed with guns and carry bombs and therefore much heavier. This maybe at the crux of the issues. Steve Hinton who has flown both a real 190 and a replica says they fly very differently.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2015) #920759
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Duxford Sunday 1st November:

    The Sea Fury’s engine gave trouble on the Legends Sunday, I’m told an R2800 is on the way.

    Are you sure that an R2800 is coming for the Sea Fury and not an R3350 given that Most 2800’s where about 2000 hp (B series) and about 2300hp C Series. Some Corsairs had 2500hp and the P47 had 2800hp available but that was with exotic fuel and water injection. Given the R3350 was and easy 2500hp or even 2800hp and up to 3000+ as was the Centaurus, an R2800 is a lot less power

    in reply to: Duxford- 'The Naughty Field' #890353
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Many people don’t think about their own safety in modern times because its always someone else responsibility, or so they think.

    The crux of the matter. In our modern society our children are taught NOT to think.

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #892201
    TempestNut
    Participant

    The actual flight path in the report clears up confusion I had as having been to quite a number of shows in Shoreham I couldn’t figure how he was where he was doing a loop. Seeing the plotted flightpath only adds to the mystery I think.

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #899654
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Did you learn to ride a bike when you were a child ? Has the knowledge stayed with you ? Did you learn to tie your shoelaces when you were a child ? Has the knowledge stayed with you ?

    Yes of course it has, you carried the knowledge forward. Not precise examples but, good enough to illustrate my point.

    I agree with you John Green. I think the counter argument is more clutching at straws. Something went wrong and in due course I hope we find a definitive answer, because I don’t think it is as simple as it possibly looks at present.

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #901313
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Has anyone at any airshow ever seen an aircraft make a pass, pull into a loop outside the airfield then continue away?

    I think the better question is has anyone every seen Andy do this at a display I never have .

    and what has lead to him ending up over 90 degrees to the display line at that end of the field he to good a pilot very odd

    Now that is one of the better question we have had. I think it finally dawning on those who have looked at the video(s) that the manoeuvre to reposition looked a little odd, why we will hopefully find out in due course, and whatever was never going to be a loop. Has anyone seen this hunter display before? Were you expecting a half cuban, which may have put him back out at sea before getting down to display height or a reverse half cuban which is what transpired or was a wingover what was expected, which changed for some reason.

    I have witnessed 2 other close calls at that end of Shoreham, (and one fatality) one by a Mustang doing a barrel roll and another by a Vampire doing the same manoeuvre. I’m just thinking can pilots become disoriented by the high ground? Does Shoreham require a special briefing?

    Shoreham is a wonderful setting and for the appropriate display no more or less dangerous than anywhere else. But I think Bruce alluded to the fact that some places need to be looked at for their suitability for some types of display.

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #903366
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Shoreham was my local show until I moved recently. I’m dismayed at the use of the word freeloader in some of the comments. I too know the surroundings intimately, and I can’t think of a worse place of all those available in this wonderful setting to watch the show than where the Hunter came down. In fact I would go as far as to say no one in that location would have been standing there to watch the show irrespective of what the still photos show. I find the word freeloader offensive and especially so in this context. Local People do walk out of their houses and onto the downs to watch the show. They are in no more danger than if they stayed in their homes. The hill side view is outside display boundary except for very large aircraft.

    I too witnessed the Hurricane crash, sadly not too far from the location of this accident, but still on low ground away from those watching up in the downs. My only other comment is do the surrounding hills make pilots, consciously or unconsciously change their manoeuvres, as I have seen some disquieting manoeuvres from a number of displays over the years, all at the same end of the field.

    And a final comment on the Red arrows not displaying at Shoreham. There is not enough room for them. They take up a lot of sky and there are hills all around. If it were all about built up areas then they would not display in a lot of other locations as well.

    in reply to: Hunter Crash at Shoreham (First AAIB report released) #905690
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Firstly my condolences to all the families effected by this tragic accident. I won’t specular about the accident, didn’t see it live but having been to Shoreham many times I have seen a few close calls and one other
    fatal accident. Maybe its something about the place.

    However to those that call this a “watershed” or otherwise event I just say this. The world is full of tragedy every day, most of which goes unreported and much of which we could do something about with a little effort. Yes this is tragic but lets keep it in perspective, as I’m sure the AAIB and CAA will do. Otherwise we should all sit at home, not drive, not work or play sport and all starve to death, surely a far better prospect.

    Humans make mistakes no matter how well we mitigated and regulated. We were all shocked many moons ago at the double tragedy in F1 and since then were lulled into a sense that it was now safe, that is until Japan last year. I’m sure there is not a single display pilot that takes off without a care in the world and has not fully prepared. But every now and again we all need to be reminded that most human endeavour has some danger attached. A couple of years back we had a Red Arrow crash, same weekend I believe, one that could have been much worse, and it was not for lack of preparation or training.

    in reply to: P-51 Candyman/Moose info sought #913380
    TempestNut
    Participant

    I believe I took this photo in May of 1980 at Biggin Hill If it wasn’t 1980 then it was 81

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]239903[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: 70 years ago today #917657
    TempestNut
    Participant

    Wow reading all these big posts from all of you sitting in arm chairs in leafy Surrey etc…. theres always a few who know more than the rest of us. If they had not dropped the bombs maybe i would not be here, my dad was training in the raf and was pretty sure they were going to be bomber crew and that meant going to the far east. He was there and was glad of the end to the war. In the far east there was more inhuman torture going on than in europe, so cant you except that this deed had to be done.We have all the answers now because it is history ,they at the time had none because the next day was there future. Amen.

    I think you may have miss the point. What we are trying to discuss, with the benefit of time, making no morale judgments about the use of the atomic bomb, is how significant the dropping of the bombs were to the timing of the surrender. I think the surrenders was likely within days or a couple of weeks at most anyway due to the state the people were in. Certain elements of the army wanted to continue to the death, but the Navy was no more and had no power, and the Army was very fractured with little cohesion left, and certainly not enough to mount a decent defence. And whilst we can all be thankful the war ended when it did it remember despite the shock and awe suffered by the residents of Hiroshima 6th and Nagasaki 9th it was still the 15th before the Emperor I believe announced the surrender. That he did was because he had become impatient with the prevarication of his own military and as has been mentioned a certain amount of self preservation. I and others who think this way mostly make no comment as to the rights and wrongs of the bombs use. For me it happened and I just like to understand the actual thought processes and what the main players really knew Certainly in the week or more after its use several British pilots lost their lives. Indeed on the 9th a Corsair pilot was shot down pressing home an attach and posthumously awarded a VC for his actions. It is unfortunate that those who are against any use of nuclear weapons will take our side of the discussion and use it to argue that the bomb should not have been used or that its use was unjustified. As with all history there is no right or wrong answer, only an interpretation of the events.

    in reply to: 70 years ago today #917734
    TempestNut
    Participant

    I agree with much of what you have written TempestNut, but August in Japan is towards the end of Summer and is one of its hottest periods with average temps well into the mid 30s Degrees C. It’s very hot and very humid. Yesterday’s high was 35C in Tokyo. Down south it’s even hotter, and even up in Hokkaido it’s in the mid to high 20s.

    Yes brain explosion on my part.:stupid: I’m dealing with another matter unrelated on another forum and got my notes mixed up. That’s what happens when you post from an iPhone. 😡 The reason there would have been a delay would have been to allow repair of some of the Aircraft Carriers and to build up the logistics chain to support a prolonged campaign. CV21 Boxer, CV36 Antietam and CV39 Lake Champlain would have also finished their training, not mention they would have got the Bearcat into service along with the F4U-4 Corsair both of which were working up at the time, and both seen as key to keeping the Kamikazes at bay. Even the British fleet was suffering from over work and a couple of the carriers were in desperate need of a refit.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 453 total)