Originally posted by Firebird
I’m glad it’s not just me that thought a Derry Turn was attempted….:(
Deleiberately never saw any of the TV footage, so only relying on ‘Mark One eyball’ footage in the memory bank.
I too saw it all. After the manoeuvre at the western end of the field I had a sinking feeling of gloom as the Firefly flew from West to East, This in complete contrast too ANY display I have seen Ray, Mark or any of the other OFMC pilots perform. (and the BBMF, FC and most other recognised display Pilots) I have said a bit on this subject on other threads and have my own conclusions. I am confident I will not be changing those conclusions.
I am sure there is going to be a major debate soon, and I would rather we now wait until April as has been indicated so that we don’t upset family or those who don’t like too much speculation.
Lets get back on track and cut the nonsense. I was at that display in 1982 and I too was spellbound by Rays flying. I would love to see the video count me in when its available please please
I’m sure that I saw Ray fly Spencer Flacks spit at a Biggin Hill display. Maybe it was in 1980 in conjunction with the Hunter flown by Stephan Kowalski?? (forgive the spelling) Again I would love to see it again and the commentary was priceless.
On balance would say no. I don’t have my references to hand but the Tempest F6 was used in the Middle East Post war and was initially in the Day fighter scheme of Ocean Grey and Dark Green. Some aircraft were in Natural Metal finish as well.
It has been suggested by another source that a new and undocumented desert scheme was used on Tempests and Spitfire FR18’s, this being from memory Dark Earth and Light Slate Grey uppers with Medium Sea Grey unders. If you need details of this research let me know and I will get the references for you. Its from a recent camo and making series for RAF fighters 1945 to 1950
Back home safe and sound
Formed up for a flypast
Some bent wing birds takeoff to give chase
Getting airborne
Here are some pic of the RNHF Seafury before the engine blew
Just found some photos that I had forgotten I’d had scaned. Found this amounst them. Not seen the A36 posted before although I’m sure it has.
I want to see the Tempest II It must be getting close
Just to help understand where the designation Mk IXB may have came from I have a quote from Dr Alfred Price who suggests that the Mk IXB is in fact the LF IX and coincides with the introduction of the Merlin 66 with its lower rated altitude engine. It appears that the RAF may have used the unofficial designations Mk IXa to describe Mk IXs with Merlin 61 or 63 engines, and the Mk IXb with the Merlin 66. The Merlin 66 was first introduced in the spring of 43 with the Biggin Hill wing.
This situation caused confusion in the field as previously the a,b,c suffix had been used to describe the armament fit. Long after the unofficial designations had become commonplace the Ministry of Aircraft Destruction issued the following designations
LF IXC for the Mk IX b
F IXC for the Mk IX a
HF IXC for the Mk IX fitted with Merlin70 and extended wing tips. (not sure if any of these were produced)
The C designation was dropped soon after it was introduced as all Mk IXs had the Universal wing, (that is until the e wing arrived about the summer of 44)
Some of the early MK IXs were conversions of MkVs and could have had the genuine B wing, but I believe they were never designated MkIXBs.
Hope this helps, but my vote goes to all MK IXs having the Universal wing until the arrival of the e wing. As to the chimneys being present or not I have to leave that to those who are lucky enough to examine at close hand those surviving aircraft.
High Altitude scheme 1989 NW Medium sea grey upper with PRU Blue below
[QUOTE]Originally posted by trumper
It WAS in the public domain,i was there with 9 other friends and i think it may help as being a closure for people to help them come to terms with what they saw.
I think this is a very important issue and it has not been given enough emphasis.
I don’t think anyone should hold their breath waiting for the “official” report to be made public. It was an MOD aircraft and they will, if past experience is anything to go by, not publish.
Has the MOD retrieved TF956 and told us all what caused the undercarriage issue, or have we all had to guess what happened. If they haven’t then we may as well discuss the Firefly now and get it out in the open BEFORE the start of this season so that any lessons can be absorbed. I do not think we are being disrespectful to the families in doing so.
The Fighter Meet North Weald Late 80’s