dark light

logical1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 121 through 130 (of 130 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Most beautiful aircraft #2263366
    logical1
    Participant

    Along with the Vigilante, I also agree that the Spitfire was nice looking. Also for a transport plane the Super Connie is beautiful. I was in a Super Connie squadron VR-7 from 58 to 61. I ran the Connie Flight Simulator. Also the B-29 and the B-70 were good looking for such large aircraft.

    There is an old saying that says that if a plane looks right it will fly right.

    in reply to: Ugliest Aircraft, your opinions… #2266603
    logical1
    Participant

    Someone said the F8U Crusader was ugly, I take exception to that.

    in reply to: North American a/c designs #2273220
    logical1
    Participant

    Hopefully Boeing learned a few things from the Rockwell engineering staff!!!!

    in reply to: Question regarding the F-15 #2273458
    logical1
    Participant

    I believe you heard of the time to climb record flights by the Streak Eagle. The sequence I heard was that the pilot went to 100%, went to full AB, blew the hold back cable bolts, and almost immediately started the landing gear up. The accelleration was so quick that it would have ripped the landing gear doors off if he didnt start the LG up quickly.

    I think one of the records the Streak Eagle set was 90,000 meters in 306 seconds. Basically he left the local area rather smartly!!!!!!

    in reply to: North American a/c designs #2273466
    logical1
    Participant

    The Skyray was one noisy plane on takeoff on burner, with a huge flame.

    in reply to: F-100 vs F8U #2273469
    logical1
    Participant

    The J79 was lighter and more sophisticated with its variable stator design. That may be why it seemed to fly at higher mach numbers than the J57. The J57 was a twin spool engine with both high and low pressure compressors and turbines.

    The J57 was one rugged engine tho. Many years back a B52 ran into baseball sized hail in Kansas. Only the bullet resistant front windows remained. All the leading edges of the plain looked like someone had pounded on them with a 20 pound sledge hammer. Yet all 8 J57s were running just fine when the plane landed!!!

    in reply to: F-100 vs F8U #2273577
    logical1
    Participant

    The J57 in the F8Us at Moffett Field around 1960 had two AB positions, off and very on!!! Big boom and huge flame on take off. On the other hand the staged burners on the J79s were not so impressive. A couple of Hamilton’s 104s landed at Moffett due to fog. I was expecting an impressive show when they took off. But after brakes off there was just some fairly quiet whuffs when the burner stages came on.

    Also at Moffett Ames Labs had one of the F8U-3 Crusaders. It had the J75. I saw it fly a few times. Now there was an impressive take off. Release brakes, huge boom when the burner lit, almost an immediate take off, wheels up and the two horizonal stabs came down to the verticle so the plane had in effect 3 rudders. Then———–a climb out at about 70 degrees.

    in reply to: F-100 vs F8U #2273979
    logical1
    Participant

    Most of the later mach 2 planes had the wing laying on top of the fuselage like the F8U did. I wonder if that had something to do with it?

    in reply to: why dont the defense dept come to it senses #2275367
    logical1
    Participant

    The one size fits all has almost never worked. The machine that is all things to all people, usually isnt really good at any thing.

    Classic example was the F-111. It was a mouse built to government specs that turned into an elephant. Even the B model for the Navy was too big.

    When they finally got it thru their heads is was no fighter, I was made into a fairly good med bomber.

    in reply to: F-22 News and debate thread #2275614
    logical1
    Participant

    Just how relevant are these airshow tricks to real combat???

Viewing 10 posts - 121 through 130 (of 130 total)