dark light

Tu 160

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 153 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2259984
    Tu 160
    Participant

    So tommorrow T50-4 will fly to Novosibirsk and T50-4 will fly to one of the checkpoint airfields 1 day at a time or will it later fly to next airbase refuel and fly to next airbase in 1 day,I think the first scenario of flying from 1 airbase to another in 1 day and fly to next airbase the next day is more likely but not sure if thats how they plan it?

    Today, it is Domna
    This is the first long-distance flight in the history of the PAK FA, there is no reason to risk. I think it will fly all the way to subsonic speed. Flight range of the T-50 without external fuel tanks – 3000 km.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2259996
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Since VK2500 has %20 more power that means its power rating has increased from 2200hp to 2640 hp?
    Also do you know about the Ka52,Mi28 and Mi35 2012 production numbers?

    VK-2500 is just another name for TV3-117VMA-SB3, a high power derivative from the TV3-117VMA which was an uprated high altitude version of the original TV3-117. Compared to the 117VMA the VK-2500 has a new compressor turbine which works at higher gas temp, further 20% higher power, new FADEC and service life increased to 9,000 hours.

    The VK-2500 is made jointly with Klimov and Motor Sich, the new Russian version will have a new name.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2260040
    Tu 160
    Participant

    ?

    So the new VK-2500 engine is the same as Klimov TV3-117 engine but now fully produced in Russia instead of Ukraine,are there any improvements to the original engine?
    So nobody knows how many of each Ka52,Mi28 and Mi35 were made and delivered to Russian VVS in 2012?????????
    Are there still 19 serial production Ka52 or more?

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2260052
    Tu 160
    Participant

    T50-4 has started its epic 7566km odyssey all the way to Zhykovsky across most of the width of Russia and all by itself,great this will probably save months in all the disasembly and reasembly if it was shipped by AN124!
    Where in its route is T50-4 now and when will it arrive to Zhykovsky? Is T50-4 going to supercruise at any time in the flight or fly subsonic all the way?
    Any more high rez pics of T50-4 painted?

    Komsomolsk-on-Amur – Domna 1700 km
    Domna – Novosibirsk – 2000 km
    Novosibirsk – Ulyanovsk 2,200 km (?)
    Ulyanovsk – Zhukovsky – 700 km

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2260897
    Tu 160
    Participant

    So now already the Ka52 and Mi28N are being mass produced with the new VK-2500 engine? The Klimov TV3-117 engines were very good and rated at 2200hp each,whats the hp rating of the new VK-2500 engine?
    So now the max speed,acceleration,service seeling and high altitude performace in mountain regions and max weapons load charactersitics have increased on the Ka52 and Mi28N?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2261399
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Any time estimate when the Mi 28NM will enter production?
    What is the quantity of Ka 52 that were manufactured in 2012 and delivered to Russian VVS and what is the quantity of Mi 28N manufactured in 2012 and delivered also,seems to be an absence of news on this?

    Despite having been described as a much more conservative and “proven” concept, the Mi-28N has not been very praised while the more complex Kamov has shown a quite remarkable reliability thus far.

    The low cost of the Havoc results from the fact that it shares quite much with the Hind family while the only things the Alligator has in common with the Mi-24/Mi-35 are engines and tyres.

    I don’t think the Mi-28N will get the radar but the further upgrade called Mi-28NM might.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2261477
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Those are still very good prices for these 2 excellent attack helos and westen/US helos are much more overpriced.It is a good idea to produce both as is being done as combined output of Kamov and Mill will replenish Russian Army avaition twice as fast.
    Is Mil likely to fix the vibration issue anytime soon and is it likely future production Mi28 will finally get the mast radar?

    Also how many Mi28N were made or delivered to Russian VVS in 2012?

    Ka-52 around $27-28mil, Mi-28N around $20mil (I suspect without radar).
    AFAIK, the radar works but suffers from poor MTBF due to excessive vibrations.

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2261489
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Whats the $ unit cost amount for both the Ka52 and Mi28N?
    Is there any plans to put radar on top of rotor on future serial produced Mi28N?

    Ka-52 costs around 30% more than Mi-28N – something over 800 million RUB

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2261493
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Ka 52

    Isn’t the current production rate of Ka 52 somewhere from 10-12 per year based on production figures from 2011? Where are all those Ka 52 made in 2012,haven’t been much news or pictures of them unlike the very well documented Su 34 deliveries?

    No of course.

    Good question about Ka-52’s, on top of my head i can only recall seeing one this year. (new that is)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2261548
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Ka 52

    So nobody on this forum knows answers to my questions on Ka 52???

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2261600
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Its avionics were updated and even at 30 years old the Mi 26 is still way better than anything the west or US has and Mi 26 is the leader in its class by a wide margin still.
    Also how many Ka 52 were manufactured in 2012 or delivered to Russian VVS in 2012? How many $ is the Russian VVS paying for a single Ka 52, around $16 million per unit?

    Mi-26T is for the civilian and export market, right? The latest batch for the Russian VVS doesn’t seem to be a later model such as the Mi-26M (was it ever build?) but I can’t believe that they get the same model that entered service now 30 years ago.

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 8 #2261928
    Tu 160
    Participant

    No, Su33 empty weight is 40,600lb and because Su33 has a blended body wing design and its large wing area its wing loading is very low,giving it excellent handling characteristics,manuvarbility and weapon load.
    While J20 has very small wings for its size and does not use a blended body wing design like the Su33 or T50 and J20 fuselage is much thicker than pretty much any other fighter so the wing loading on the J20 is going to be very high maybe even higher than the F35

    If you want to say the same for a Su-33… yes. Why don’t you check the recent satellite images. It’s shorter.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2261934
    Tu 160
    Participant

    Has T50-4 been painted yet and when will it fly to Zhukovzky or is it going to fly straight to that other airfield for March VVS trails? I hope they won’t waste time again by dismatling it and ferring it in an AN 124?

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2261967
    Tu 160
    Participant

    How many Ka 52 were manufactured in 2012 or delivered to Russian VVS in 2012? How many $ is the Russian VVS paying for a single Ka 52, around $16 million per unit?

    in reply to: J-20 Thread 8 #2262093
    Tu 160
    Participant

    J 20 is very big,fat and long for a fighter even in the heavy fighter class,its empty weight whould almost certainly be 50,000lb+ and its wing loading whould be very high and heavy because of its small wings and wing area even with the canards. I am confused is it confirmed that J20 is longer than 21 meters?

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 153 total)