I think this may be a hoax. There is no way that 372 is worth as much money as is being asked for here. Also, the guys at Delta know nothing about it. The only Hunter that Delta look after that is for sale is VETA (unfortunately!)
As regards 577, mechanically, she’s pretty much complete. Currently awaiting the avionics guys to finish (Yawn!) so that the cockpit can be completed. Hopefully will fly before the Kemble Airday:confused:
Rumour on the grapevine that the Real Aeroplane Co will be debuting their 3 ship at Leg Ends (Hurri, pink Spit and the Buchon). Nice!:D
Phantom II
SHAR can carry a max of 4 AMRAAAM, 2 on outboard pylons, 2 on the gun stations. Inboard pylons are not wired for AMRAAM carriage
Checheno
The first pic you posted I believe has twin rail launchers for AIM-9L. The second pic, as already stated is a GR7 (of the SAOEU at Boscombe) And no, Sea Harrier only has 2 underwing pylons on each side. AV-8Bs have 3, GR7s and T10s have 4.
Cheers
Dees
What about the pressurised version of the Wellington? Truly hideous. A face so ugly only it’s mother etc,etc
LN Strike Eagle
Actually, there are private Hawks about. BAE SYSTEMS own 2 demontrator aircraft (ZJ100 and HNDA) and 5 Mk53 aircraft. However, they are not on the civil register but operated under COMA (company owned military aircaft), under the auspices of D Flying.
The FRADU jets are operated by civil operators, although I think they are still MOD property. (same goes for the flying training Hawks at Valley)
RobAnt,
You are correct, the Hunter is just about supersonic in a dive. The Gnat is as well. I believe the issue is with reheated jets, not supersonic aircraft.
There are no Hawks currently being operated on the Civil register IIRC. All the jets operated by civil companies are regulated by D Flying under AvP67 (eg FRADU). SO no problem there. Maybe thats the way forward – get all these heavy metal jets onto the military register, and then tell the CAA to shove their regulations where the sun don’t shine!
:p
Surely the best memorial to all of these aircraft, and the men who may have fought or died in them, is to have the aircraft up in the air where future generations can really see and appreciate them! If the only way to do that is by getting commercial sponsorship, and any associated paint scheme that goes with it, then so be it!
And I think Miss Demeanor and the Vixen look bloomin’ gorgeous. But it is still only personal opinion.
——————————————————————————–
Morning all! I’m new to this so bear with me!
Originally posted by Robbo
The more I look at photos of Z2033 (and the real thing yesterday), the more I can’t believe it was swapped for a blinking Sea Harrier. Barmy.
Rob
Excellent swap! The SHAR is a lovely bit of kit! (and the FRS1 must be considered historic now)
MOTF
The Sea Jet at the FAA museum is a GR3 with a SHAR nose grafted on, and may just about count as the last Sea Harrier delivery from Dunsfold before the site closed. It was built mainly by the apprentices. (must confess, i don’t know where the GR3 bit came from, but the Sea Harrier bit was apparently puled out of the Adriatic after the jet crashed)
The AV-A8 as displayedin the IWM North was wholly built by Hawker Siddley (as was). the yanks only got involved in the development of the Harrier II (AV-8B)
Cheers
Dunc