dark light

dees01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 158 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Your loudest aircraft? #1375056
    dees01
    Participant

    Surprised no-one has mentioned the Harrier. Not the out-and-out loudest – I still reckon the Tornado scores highly here! – but surely the loudest sustained noise maker around…

    in reply to: Two Seat Harrier Photographs #1351054
    dees01
    Participant

    Ian,

    The last time I saw that it was in a small garage at Charnock Richard. Hopefully you got the boxes of cockpit bits that I managed to aquire for Darryl? Good to see it’s got a seat in at last.

    in reply to: Which Aircraft would you most like to fly in ? #1374774
    dees01
    Participant

    Got lucky and done the Hunter. Would love to fly the ‘day job’, a Harrier. T4 or T10 would do. Other than that, a Hurricane ould be nice, or a mosquito, or a Shack.

    in reply to: Hawker Harrier GR3 to New Zealand #1381433
    dees01
    Participant

    Pendantic mode on.

    It’s Hawker Siddeley Harrier

    Pedantic mode off…

    in reply to: Interview with Ginger Lacey during BofB filming #1405671
    dees01
    Participant

    ‘Nuff said!

    in reply to: B17,,,LOW how Low can you go? #1411409
    dees01
    Participant

    there is also video footage of Bill Bedford displaying the prototype Hunter T7 at Farnborough where he is head height down the runway.

    Incidently, low flying like this still happens. Witness the Belgian(?) Fouga Magister take off and subsequent low pass up the runway (and that thing’s not very high off the deck to start with!)

    I have to say, though, low flypasts are one thing, what really worries me is low level aeros, especially low energy manoeuvres with insufficient recovery heights..

    in reply to: Vulcan plans fall apart #1414572
    dees01
    Participant

    I do take exception to some readers on this forum bashing him 😡 for what he tried to do For those that think he was wrong and silly for doing what he did then I ask you, sit back from the pc and ask yourself what have I done to help with aircraft preservation lately…? I think I know the answer… Come on guys lets give him some credit….

    Hmm let’s see. A 400mile round trip to work on some vintage jets two or three weekends a month. Do that count as doing something for aircraft preservation? I also live near Blackpool so have seen first hand the poor state of the aircraft. My comments stand, going into this purchase Eyes Wide Shut as this chap appears to have done was extremely foolhardy!

    in reply to: Vulcan plans fall apart #1414747
    dees01
    Participant

    It is amazing that those 40 year old B-52’s have got to keep soldiering on till 2040. 🙂

    Mark

    Ahh, but they are still in service and will get regularly inspected and any corrosion treated. They won’t be left outside in the north of England in all weathers for 20years, with no work expended on them and then be expected to be pristine…

    in reply to: Vulcan plans fall apart #1415149
    dees01
    Participant

    Well said Robbo!

    Old Fart, The reason this guy is getting flak from people here is not because he had a dream, but because of his apparent complete lack of a clue! Rushing into a purchase without a) having the planning permission for the site intended for it, b) not estimating for the cost of moving such a large aircraft, and c) not having (as far as I can tell) the aircraft surveyed to see if it can even be dismantled properly, is just madness, ill advised at best.

    With the right amount of money, anything can be saved, but I don’t think this chap has the kind of funds necessary in this case. A bit of decent investigation before a rash ebay bid would probably have saved himself (and his wife!) a great deal of grief!

    As for saving the cockpit, this in itself will a MAJOR undertaking…

    in reply to: Vulcan plans fall apart #1417182
    dees01
    Participant

    One of those “I don’t mean to tell you so, but….”

    Obviously one of Jim Henson’s finer creations!

    in reply to: Buccaneer Pics #1426335
    dees01
    Participant

    Kemble – 2002 Pilot Keith Hartly – Nav Dave Roome

    I bet Dave has never been classed as a Nav before!!! 😀 😀

    in reply to: AV-8B #2613874
    dees01
    Participant

    [QUOTE=PhantomII]I think the idea to put extra AAM launchers was dropped on the AV-8B, but still implemented on the GR.7/7A.
    QUOTE]

    If you’re talking about the outrigger pylons, then that’s correct. This was implemented very early in the development of the GR5, and all the UK Harrier IIs have had outrigger pylons. The Av-8B with tip launchers was a model that I believe MD did for a proposed Harrier III. I did have a pic, but I can’t find it now!

    Centrelines on GR7/7A will usually be utilised for recce pod or baggage pod.

    in reply to: Aircraft available for future preservation? #1430003
    dees01
    Participant

    Last time I saw ZA175 was when it was being loaded onto the flatbed. We were down at Yeovil on a ski jump trial, and the ground crew found the spectacle of ‘175 being loaded much funnier than watching our jet off the ramp!

    I hope ZA195 gets put back together and put on display. Did a large structural repair on the nose hinge frame just before she left Dunsfold for Warton. Shame to see her in such as state!

    Anyone know what has happened to XZ439?

    in reply to: AV-8B #2614298
    dees01
    Participant

    I don’t know a great deal about AV-8B, but TERs for Mk82 certainly were cleared for stations 2, 3, 5 and 6 on AV-8B. I don’t believe more than 1 Mk83 can be carried on any one station though. As far as GR7 goes, no multiple racks are cleared

    in reply to: AV-8B #2614400
    dees01
    Participant

    A few more bits of info about the GR7. The stores stations are 1-7 port to starboard, so the port outboard is No.1.

    SNEB is no longer extant on GR7, the equivalent is CRV-7.

    In addition to SOC’s list, Paveway III can be carried on stations 3 and 5.

    The 25mm gun was dropped from the jet as it never really worked properly. Jets still carry gunpods with no guns fitted, but for jet lift purposes only. The gun is not part of the GR9 fit.

    The gun fitted to the AV-8B is a 30mm cannon, but only one is fitted. As I understand it, the ammo is carried in one pod, whilst the actual gun is in the port pod.

    As far as maintainability goes, it wasn’t high on the list of priorities when Harrier was designed! You do have to remove the wing to lift the engine, and no, the airframe doesn’t ‘break in half’ In terms of reliability, I have heard that Harrier Force during Telic achieved a really good reliability record, but I can’t remember what the actual numbers were.

    Hope that helps..

    Dees

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 158 total)