dark light

dees01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 158 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wattisham 1990 – F-4 heaven #1608481
    dees01
    Participant

    Managed to have quite a good look around/under/inside XV408 at Fairford. unfortunately, she’s in quite a state. The cockpit is completely stripped of any instrumentation (although I think the throttle tops may still be in place, all the panels are missing about 90% of the fasteners and there is a fair amount of corrosion around the airframe, especially in the bays. Shame, really.

    in reply to: Chailey gets it right, Moggy gets it confused. #1797034
    dees01
    Participant

    Mark 12

    have you got any more photos of aircraft at Coolham? The reason for asking is that my parents live right on the edge of what was the airfield, and I have not managed to find many (any?!) pics of the airfield.

    Cheers
    Dees

    in reply to: Hurn this morning #1799049
    dees01
    Participant

    Is this not John Bradshaw’s Fury, which normally lives at Kemble?

    in reply to: Caption time again #1799963
    dees01
    Participant

    We can teach monkeys to fly better than that!…

    in reply to: Exeter Today (Hunters) #1809917
    dees01
    Participant

    has the T7 got an engine yet? Last I heard, it was engine-less and 100series avons are not easy to come by.

    in reply to: Kemble Today #1816040
    dees01
    Participant

    Greta photos Glen, just one correction, we flew 14 Hunter sorties not 12! Damn hard work, but worth it just to see that formation. All in all, a good day!

    By the way, what was that website I should be looking at?

    in reply to: Airfields with new uses #1819601
    dees01
    Participant

    That NO Girls Allowed programme was also filmed at Dunsfold

    in reply to: Kemble Open Day – September 12th #1565759
    dees01
    Participant

    and feature all of their jets at some stage or another during the day.

    Assuming permission from various owners…

    in reply to: Strange places……….! #1566750
    dees01
    Participant

    Best place to keep a JP3 I reckon!

    in reply to: Ungrateful anoraks #1567040
    dees01
    Participant

    Always a wheeze to chalk up two differnt reg no.s on different sides of an a/c that’s on rebuild. gets the number crunchers going everytime!! 😀

    in reply to: Kemble Open Day – September 12th #1567042
    dees01
    Participant

    Delta will be putting out the usual turn out of Hunters, so look for WV318, G-PSST and possibly WV372. G-VETA may be out and about although probably unlikely to fly given current progress. I imagine the Gnat (G-RORI) will fly, possibly G-MOUR as well, and the JP5 may be airborne.

    Cheers

    Dees

    in reply to: First Fight in a Lanc #1567076
    dees01
    Participant

    Just found these! Simply stunning photos, just a shame the Hurricane couldn’t have beenin the first pic! Still going on my desktop at work though. BTW, is that Rutland Water in the first pic?

    in reply to: XH558 – The Vulcan Will Fly #1586069
    dees01
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Willow]Glad to know that people don’t care whether a restored static aeroplane is complete internally or not.
    Clearly the last 10 years worth of work by the Sunderland crew at Duxford has been a complete waste of time

    Thanks

    Willow

    P.S. XJ824 at Duxford is undoubtably in better condition anyway because it hasn’t been taken apart and (hopefully) put back together again since it came out of service. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.[/QUOTE

    The point I was trying to make is that a vast number of poeple who see a static (or flying for that matter) aircraft will not know anything about it and hence be even less bothered if it is complete inside. The people who do know will appreciate (which will include just about everyone on this forum), so the time and effort is justified. Bruce’s point about historical representation of a type is exactly right. It won’t alter that fact that the families who pass through the gates of Duxford probably won’t know or care.

    As for XJ824, she may be in good order as she hasn’t been taken apart, but I know plenty of aircraft that haven’t and are ready for nothing more than the scrapman. The Vulvan at Blackpool is a case in point. Another good one would be a comparison of two Shacks: the duxford one, now very delapidated, but one that flew into the airfield, and Juliet at Gatwick, who has been taken apart, moved, reassembled and now is (looking at the photos) in pretty good order thanks to the efforts of a dedicated team

    in reply to: XH558 – The Vulcan Will Fly #1586245
    dees01
    Participant

    Bruce,

    I think that in this instance it is the specific aircraft, not just a representative of a type, that is being preserved. Thus, 558 should, once retired from flying, be kept in whatever state she last flew in. That in itself is a point of historical interest. An d i’ll stand by my statment that the majority of people won’t actually know what the damn thing is unless there is a board in front of it stating what it is.

    My own view is that aircraft should be in the air, and if by removing various bits of kit that are superfluous to the current operation we can simplify maintenance and keep them airborne for longer, then so much the better. Likewise, I don’t think object to non military paint schemes on former military jets (but that’s a WHOLE different thread!)

    in reply to: XH558 – The Vulcan Will Fly #1586310
    dees01
    Participant

    Here’s another thought – how’s about putting all the money allocated to the VTS into getting the TRS2 back into the air! Any takers??

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 158 total)