Managed to have quite a good look around/under/inside XV408 at Fairford. unfortunately, she’s in quite a state. The cockpit is completely stripped of any instrumentation (although I think the throttle tops may still be in place, all the panels are missing about 90% of the fasteners and there is a fair amount of corrosion around the airframe, especially in the bays. Shame, really.
Mark 12
have you got any more photos of aircraft at Coolham? The reason for asking is that my parents live right on the edge of what was the airfield, and I have not managed to find many (any?!) pics of the airfield.
Cheers
Dees
Is this not John Bradshaw’s Fury, which normally lives at Kemble?
We can teach monkeys to fly better than that!…
has the T7 got an engine yet? Last I heard, it was engine-less and 100series avons are not easy to come by.
Greta photos Glen, just one correction, we flew 14 Hunter sorties not 12! Damn hard work, but worth it just to see that formation. All in all, a good day!
By the way, what was that website I should be looking at?
That NO Girls Allowed programme was also filmed at Dunsfold
and feature all of their jets at some stage or another during the day.
Assuming permission from various owners…
Best place to keep a JP3 I reckon!
Always a wheeze to chalk up two differnt reg no.s on different sides of an a/c that’s on rebuild. gets the number crunchers going everytime!! 😀
Delta will be putting out the usual turn out of Hunters, so look for WV318, G-PSST and possibly WV372. G-VETA may be out and about although probably unlikely to fly given current progress. I imagine the Gnat (G-RORI) will fly, possibly G-MOUR as well, and the JP5 may be airborne.
Cheers
Dees
Just found these! Simply stunning photos, just a shame the Hurricane couldn’t have beenin the first pic! Still going on my desktop at work though. BTW, is that Rutland Water in the first pic?
[QUOTE=Willow]Glad to know that people don’t care whether a restored static aeroplane is complete internally or not.
Clearly the last 10 years worth of work by the Sunderland crew at Duxford has been a complete waste of time
Thanks
Willow
P.S. XJ824 at Duxford is undoubtably in better condition anyway because it hasn’t been taken apart and (hopefully) put back together again since it came out of service. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.[/QUOTE
The point I was trying to make is that a vast number of poeple who see a static (or flying for that matter) aircraft will not know anything about it and hence be even less bothered if it is complete inside. The people who do know will appreciate (which will include just about everyone on this forum), so the time and effort is justified. Bruce’s point about historical representation of a type is exactly right. It won’t alter that fact that the families who pass through the gates of Duxford probably won’t know or care.
As for XJ824, she may be in good order as she hasn’t been taken apart, but I know plenty of aircraft that haven’t and are ready for nothing more than the scrapman. The Vulvan at Blackpool is a case in point. Another good one would be a comparison of two Shacks: the duxford one, now very delapidated, but one that flew into the airfield, and Juliet at Gatwick, who has been taken apart, moved, reassembled and now is (looking at the photos) in pretty good order thanks to the efforts of a dedicated team
Bruce,
I think that in this instance it is the specific aircraft, not just a representative of a type, that is being preserved. Thus, 558 should, once retired from flying, be kept in whatever state she last flew in. That in itself is a point of historical interest. An d i’ll stand by my statment that the majority of people won’t actually know what the damn thing is unless there is a board in front of it stating what it is.
My own view is that aircraft should be in the air, and if by removing various bits of kit that are superfluous to the current operation we can simplify maintenance and keep them airborne for longer, then so much the better. Likewise, I don’t think object to non military paint schemes on former military jets (but that’s a WHOLE different thread!)
Here’s another thought – how’s about putting all the money allocated to the VTS into getting the TRS2 back into the air! Any takers??