Ive got to agree with Peter, it would be brilliant to see the aircraft painted in BOB film markings.
It would be a very apt way of telling part of Duxfords history and a reminder of how the warbird movement really was kick started by the film.
If the scheme was recreated properly when the light hit the airframe in certain ways you would just be able to see the Spanish markings underneath the Luftwaffe camou as in the film. 😀
My last words Re the Comet (as I hate it when I start threads and they get hijacked) the David Ogilvy book on the Comet describes in detail what was done restoration wise up untill 1984. And a lot of replacing of orginal structure was undertaken. Like David Burke ive seen the pics and its more than a reskin like many would have you believe.
Back on topic, I would just be worried with the FW190D that the POTENTIAL loss of an important airframe is there. I just think with two examples left we need to preserve them for future generations. Even more so now as replicas of this variant are on the horizon.
We moan about how past generations scrapped warbirds enmasse leaving us with so few to enjoy.
Wouldnt it be a shame if future genrations berrated us for having risked and lost rare and historic aircraft which meant they were unable to enjoy even the static view of certain types. Maybe due to loss at airshows etc etc. I know thats really going to an extreme but……….
Saying that though if you told me this FW190D was going to fly at Legends in 2008 would I be making the trip to see it? I would be lying if I said no.
Not quite so black and white is it?
Interesting that you bring the Shuttleworths DH.88 Comet into the conversation Roger. I was going to mention it much earlier but thought the conversation may wander off topic a little.
But an excellent example of a highly original and historically important airframe that in the process of been made airworthy has lost a lot of its historical integrity.
A large portion of the airframe structure (that would have been suitable for a static aircraft) was replaced so she could fly. To Joe public its still Grosvenor House but for me it’s lost a little something along the way.
Ive seen the pictures of the flying replica in the USA and that looks lovely. Next to each other it would be hard to tell the difference.
Ok when the restoration was started all those years ago it wasnt an option but today would Shuttleworth go down the same route with such a historic machine? I personally hope they wouldn’t.
Ok the FW190D isnt in the same league but its one of only two. Having read all the thoughts and views Im still with the leave it on the ground brigade. Sorry chaps.
Only five??? Oh ok here goes.
Vickers Viscount (achieved that 😀 )
Supermarine Spitfire (either a Mk.IX or TR.IX, ML407 would be very
nice)
De Havilland Mosquito B.35 (like the clear nose and the larger nacelles with
two stage engines)
Avro Lancaster
Douglas DC-6 (have spent to much time watching the AA ones
and love the noise they make)
Ive got to say I agree with those who have already passed comment. It would be great to see this variant of 190 fly but she is too rare a type and she should be preserved for future generations.
I dont know much about the history of this airframe and how much of her is orginal but some historical integrity would surely have to be lost through a restoration to flying condition. Also there is the risk associated with flying warbirds or indeed any aircraft.
Normally Im not one for replicas but after seeing Duxford’s convincing replica Fw190 at Legends at the weekend I would have to say make a replica and leave this one safely on the ground.
Brilliant link Daz.
Love the way you have educated the unimformed You Tube masses about the charms and importance of the Buchon. 😀
Personally Ive always thought the Buchon was a better looking aircraft than the Me 109 but each to their own.
And yes a very poor soundtrack. I got 30 seconds in and muted it.
Your like the devil Les one mention and you appear.
Well I was just impressed that the french had the skills to fly anything half decently………even a helicopter. 😉
Ok I know this one’s helicopters but I think we can allow this one in through the back door.
Hopefully this will get your approval Les. Most def not from the bottom of the barrel I thinks 😀
http://www.patricksaviation.com/videos/kerva%26euml%3Bl/406/
By the looks of it not that up to date.
Our Viscount most definately isn’t laid out like that at the moment and hasn’t been for a long time now.
Midland Air Museums changed a bit since the picture was taken. Sea Vixen no longer has wings folded, Meteor NF14 has had two repaints since and we now have buildings where the Electra’s are sat near the museums boundary fence.
Is that the AZ-H thats been the subject of the 1/72nd scale Airfix Spitfire Mk1 kit?
There’s really no Father Christmas?
Thats 1-0 to my Old man then :rolleyes:
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm isnt she pretty 😀
Was it 213 I remember seeing in a Flypast magazine years ago that had genuinly worn a gunnery school scheme which featured a yellow and red striped nose/forward fuselage?
Now there’s a thought the DC-6 at legends.
She would be eligible wouldnt she????
Is -APSA the DC-6 with the possible CIA background or is that -SIXC?
Ive also been watchin her. Addmittedly from the dry confines of my living room.
Heard her rumbling in the distance a while before I caught sight of her.
Its great to see her back in the sky once more. Fingers crossed for a sponsor, would be a sad bit of airspace without a DC-6 flying around.
I thought there was already a pair of Tempests been restored to flying condition in the UK?
A Tiffie would be nice though. A nice paired display with the modern day name sake aka Eurofighter.