dark light

Phantom Phixer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cosford airframes movements #1307782
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Hi Bex. Been watching with interest the posting about the Canberra retoration your doing.

    We at the Midland Air Museum very much encourage people to come inside our exhibits. Volunteers allowing we usually have the Vulcan open and also the Argosy. We will then hold open cockpit days where we open other aircraft up. Now while we do enjoy doing this we do always have to be mindful of the Health and Safety implication.There are some airframes which for whatever reason it is just not possible for the public to get into.

    Im not saying that Cosford should open exhibits up but with some aircraft like the Argosy the H&S risk is surely minimal.

    Saying that though think that there is a diff in the smaller museums such as ours and the likes of Cosford. Could you imagine Duxford opening their Vulcan up? There would be a constant que akin to a ride at Alton towers for people waiting to go up. the numbers passing through their doors perhaps perhibits them from doing such a thing.

    I have my own opinions of course but just playing devils advocate.

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1307911
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Hi XN923, hope the Hurri drawings were of use.

    I think at the time I was referring to it was proably a fair comment. Most of the kits back then did suffer from poor fit and a only slightly smaller number didnt feature the obligitory rivets. And as a begginer to modelling my Dad wanting me to finish models prob did point me in the right direction. Bear in mind though that was 20-25 years and in that period the quality which you could achieve from your molds wasnt as good as we expect from todays Tamiyagawa offerings. Acceptable then but the bench mark has been raised now by so many companies that have appeared in recent years.

    Yes I also think your quite right in what you say about their recent efforts. Especially in the last twelve months. The TSR2 the planned Canberra and Nimrodalso the other tie ins they have done. Inspired subjects. Looking further back like wise the Lightning and the late mark Spit/Seafire all fantastic kits. The Buccanner also inspired in subject matter but from a point of view of a well engineered kit its simply to much of a pig. Yes ive built two and will probably do another as its the only one in town at that scale. But I have to build up the motivation to do it.

    I dont agree (Sorry mate) about the reworked MkV 1/72nd Spit. Raised panel lines on the fuselage with recessed lines on the wings. Also a new wing that was far to thick in section to be scale. Nope a clanger dropped there.

    I think that some of the older kits do need to be dropped from the range. The Defiant the MKIX Spitfire to name but a few. Holding onto those in the range will harm the brand name .However reissuing some of the other classics can achieve good sales if a good kit. The Dragon Rapide is an example. They flew out of the museum shop where I volunteer. OK bad pun I know.

    Im not anti Airfix I just think and I hope that Hornby will look long and hard at what to keep and what to lose from the range. The company cant live forever on its name and nostalgia. People who grew up building Airfix as kids get older and cant indefinately continue supporting the company.

    I also hope that as a British company has taken over the company we may see some more British subjects appear.

    1/48th injection Vulcan, 1/72nd scale VC10 anybody? Now if only…………..

    OK im gonna come down of my high horse now as getting a little dizzy.

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1307938
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Love the Pearl HArbour comment philip if a little politically incorrect.

    When I was a kid (im 30 now) my dad taught me how to make plastic kits. Even back then he would never let me have an Airfix kit as they didnt fit properly and had Rivets the size of helmets littered all over them.

    I was bought up on Matchbox kits and although not perfect they did some cracking kits of some very differant subjects.

    in reply to: Corgi model confusion???. #1307972
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    S&M produce some very different and welcome decal subjects. Ive got a set for the Airfix Comet so that Canopus can be modelled and also a Queens Flight BAe 146. The quality of printing isnt I will admit upto sheets from companies such as Aeromaster but still more than acceptable. And they must be applauded for their subject matter.

    in reply to: Corgi model confusion???. #1308077
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    If anybody is interested in Corgi stuff I have a mate who is trying to sell a very limited Corgi 1/72nd MOsquito of RR299 (the BAe example). Drop me an im if you want more details. Prob be a very good investment.

    in reply to: Cosford airframes movements #1308110
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    I went a couple of months ago and it was in the same hanger of the above pictures. Opposite wall to that the Sycamore is hanging.

    in reply to: Cosford airframes movements #1308113
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Great to see the Argosy and Andover inside. Two rare breeds these days.

    But also very nice to see the two Gnats side by side and the piston provost and Jp together.

    in reply to: Long Marston's Aircraft #1309043
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    If any one can help me with posting the picks please drop me an IM. Some reason I cant getthem to send ,Even willing to email them to someone to pop on for me. Sorry guys obv exceded my limit here

    in reply to: Long Marston's Aircraft #1309062
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    HAving a few probs sending the pics. Bear with me they will appear in due coarse.

    in reply to: AAs Rapide 'IDL a TV star #1309399
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Maybe a rename to Planes of Fame is in order?

    Ooops thats already been done

    in reply to: Aeroventure, Doncaster, 12th November 2006 #1309462
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Be good to see the pics youve taken and also saves us on advertising fees. Your pics will show people just how great out museum is and they will come and see for themselves. Saves us on advertising and means more money to continue looking after the aircraft to the standard we do now.

    Seriously though would be good to see the pics youve taken of our aircraft. Next time you pop up you should introduce yourself. Always good to meet fellow forumites.

    Regards MArtin

    in reply to: Sea Prince G-BRFC #1310010
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Who owns her David. Wrecks and Relics says the local land owner but Ive also been told that its owned by Gordon Yates. Ive heard the same abouth the Meteor and other aircraft in the Long Marston site. If I Can figure out how to post pics will set a new thread some point today with the pics I took

    in reply to: Sea Prince G-BRFC #1310181
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Looking good isnt she. I walked around the poor looking example at Long Marston a few weeks ago. Very sad sight indeed. Grafetti all over her but beneath the horrible paint job she dont look in bad condition. Engines still have compression when you turn the blades. If anybodies int will post some pics.

    in reply to: No pleasing some people! #1310182
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    If it doesnt work though and the relationship takes a turn for the worse dont blame me though buddy.

    in reply to: Aeroventure, Doncaster, 12th November 2006 #1310190
    Phantom Phixer
    Participant

    Nice pics rob.

    I think the Nimrod was at Long Marston for a while. Remember seeing it there a few years ago. Something a little differant isnt it.

    Think you need to come over to Midland Air Museum and we can let you play in some of our things. That is as long as you promise to put the pics o the forum and tell everybody how great we are.

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 761 total)