I asked about this one on the forum last year.
Ive got the SAM book on the Meteor which has extracts from the manuals and shows the panel in question from an NF13. If you want to PM me a snail mail address I will copy it and forward for you. The book also shows the NF14 rear panel as well.
Thanks…….perhaps I should visit the forum a little bit more and then wouldn’t have to ask such silly questions!!
Best wishes,
Martin
Or maybe some of us should frequent less :p
Think this should answer your question
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=83653&highlight=lightning
are you refferring to the one from the Air Cadet Air Experience Flying Video?
I would love to see that old video again. How many times did I have to watch that when I went to AEF.
“Jump John jump”.
“Jumping Sir”. 😀
Fairey Firefly?
Does these pics show the ridge what Oxcart is describing?
Guillows do a range of stick and balsa kits of various things including a Catalina, B25 and a Liberator. They are supposedly flyable but i have never herd of one flying sucsessfully.
Edit, some for sale here:
http://www.modelsforsale.com/catalog/modelkits.php?manufacturers_id=13613?GuillowsOr here:
http://www.samsmodels.com/acatalog/copy_of_Guillows_Scale_Kits.html
Nice looking models once done but for begginers far far to complex models which would prob result in them been binned from sheer frustration.
I completed their P-38 as a static model. Fiddly as **** but Looked rather impressive once done.
An excellent idea from Daz or……………………………drop someone you know called Phantom Phixer a PM as he has tonnes and tonnes of R/C plans that if you ask nice he may photocopy a couple of and send upto you. 😉
Ive never heard about this.
How many extant are there claimed to be?
Yep Martin they’re part of the Great War Display Team and are Junkers G/1s
Not based at Sywell, but they do transit through a lot.
ATB
TT
Blimey TT that was a quick reply.
Cheers
Maybe slightly off topic but two seat non the less.
What are those aircraft I see at Sywell when ever I vist. OK Ive only ever visted three times but……………
Obviously meant to be WW1 and have a gunners position behind the pilot.
Are they based on a Bowers Flybaby and meant to ressemble a Junkers?
Well seeing as Dave has asked for updates, here goes mine.
Airspeed Horsa mkII wing and fuselage sections + skinning, minor fittings. (AS Horsa)
Auster J1/N Autocrat G-AJPZ frame (Rlangham)
Auster J/1 ? frame (Ritch & Max)
Auster AOP.9 XK421 frame (XM692)
Auster AOP.9 WZ679, airworthy restoration (Phantom Phixer)
Avro Anson Mk.II (ex-Canada) cockpit (RossMcNeill)
Avro Anson C XIX front fuselage VP519 (Air Ministry and pal)
Avro Anson C.21 anon’ cockpit (RossMcNeill)
Avro Anson GR1 EG426 – Static Project (Mark P)
Avro Lincoln B2 RF342 – Static Project (Mark P)
Avro Shackleton AEW.2 WL756 nose/cockpit (Camlobe)
Be2c Replica -airworthy restoration (The Blue Max & Low n Slow)
Beagle Pup-100 G-AXNL Cockpit (Ritch & Max)
Bede BD-5B unflown airframe (Ritch & Max)
Beechcraft D.18s G-BKRN -airworthy restoration (philipturland and Texantomcat)
BAC Lightning 53-671/ZF579 (mjr)
Blackburn Buccaneer S.2B XX889 (Buccsociety)
Boeing B-17 Cockpit section-reproduction (B-17man)
Boeing B-17 Radio room-reproduction (B-17man)
Commonwealth CA-6 Wackett Trainer A3-167 Flying Project -(Mark P)
Commonwealth CA-6 Wackett Trainer A3-85 Flying Project (Mark P)
Commonwealth CA-6 Wackett Trainer A3-156 Static Project (Mark P)
Commonwealth CA-27 Sabre, A94-983 (Pete.PS)
Consolidated B-24 Cockpit section-reproduction (B-17man)
de Havilland Chipmunk ‘pax WP927 (12jaguar)
de Havilland Chipmunk ‘pax WZ869 (XM692)
de Havilland Chipmunk ‘pax anon’ (XM692)
de Havilland Chipmunk PAX WG419 (Texantomcat & philipturland)
de Havilland Hornet F.MK.1 nose/cockpit – repro’ (dcollins103)
de Havilland Mosquito B.IV ‘DZ313′ fuselage – repro’ (G Adlam)
de Havilland Vampire FB.5 VZ193 pod (dcollins103)
de Havilland Vampire T.11 XD599 pod (philipturland and Texantomcat)
de Havilland Vampire T.11 XE985 pod (MarkG)
de Havilland Vampire T.11 XH313 (Vampire)
de Havilland Vampire T.11 XH328 pod (Bruce)
de Havilland Vampire T.11 WZ584 (Bruce)
de Havilland Sea Venom FAW.22 XG692 pod (XG692)
Douglas C-47A Skytrain / Dakota 111 FL517 nose/cockpit (c-47 Skytrain)
Douglas C-47B Dakota 111 TS436 of 1943/Starboard wing sparing (AS Horsa)
English Electric Canberra PR.7 WH773 (BexWH773)
English Electric Canberra PR.9 XH175 nose/cockpit (RossMcNeill)
English Electric Canberra T4 WT486 nose/cockpit (sniperUK/2241sq ATC)
English Electric Canberra TT.18 WH887 nose/cockpit (Merkle)
English Electric Lightning F.1 XM144 nose/cockpit (XM172)
English Electric Lightning F.1A XM172 full airframe (XM172)
English Electric Lightning F.2 XN769 nose/cockpit (rmc)
English Electric Lightning T.5 XS420 full airframe (XM172)
English Electric Lightning T.5 XS458 full airframe (rmc)
English Electric Lightning F.6 XS897 full airframe (XM172)
English Electric Lightning F6 XS922 nose/cockpit (XM172)
English Electric/BAC Lightning F.3 XP706 (Scott C)
Enstrom 280C Shark G-BXEE full airframe (now with main rotors!) (iws)
Fairey Firefly AS.6 WB440 cockpit/fuselage (HMS Vulture)
Folland Gnat T.185 ‘XM692’ cockpit (XM692)
Gloster Meteor NF.14 WS807 (Buccaneer Society/Jet Age Museum)
Handley Page Halifax B Mk III cockpit reproduction (Cees Broere)
Hawker Harrier T4 anon’ nose/cockpit (XM172)
Hawker Hurricane P3554 ‘Jessamy’ (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hurricane MKII project (G Adlam)
Hawker Hunter F1 WT648 nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F2 WN890 nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter F4 ‘XF940’ nose/cockpit (XF940)
Hawker Hunter F5 WN957 nose/cockpit (XG692)
Hawker Hunter F6 XG290 nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Hawker Hunter T7 XL591 (mjr)
Hawker Hunter GA11 WT711 (XM172)
Hawker Hunter FGA.78 QA12 nose/cockpit (MarkG)
Hawker Hunter F.51 E-425 (Phantom Phixer)
Hawker Sea Hawk F1 WF145 nose/cockpit (HMS Vulture)
Hawker Sea Hawk FGA.6 WV838 nose/cockpit (wv838)
Hawker Sea Hawk FGA.6 XE339 fuselage only (wv838)
Hunting Jet Provost T.3 XN549 nose/cockpit (avroxix)
Miles M-65 Mk 3A Gemini G-AKEK (galdri)
Miles Messenger M.2a G-AKIN -airworthy (texantomcat)
North American AT-6-D-1-NT Texan airworthy restoration G-TOMC (Texantomcat and philipturland)
North American F86D 51-6151 (Lindy’s Lad)
Percival Prospector G-ARDG forward fuselage (XM692)
Piper PA22 Colt – airworthy. (Moggy)
VS Seafire Cockpit Project (Rocketeer)
SCHLEICHER kA 8B Cockpit Section, ID presently unknown (Phantom Phixer)
Slingsby Grasshopper TX/1 WZ820 -airworthy (Texantomcat & philipturland)
Supermarine Spitfire IX (Stuart Gowans)
Supermarine Spitfire nose/cockpit (Rocketeer)
Supermarine Spitfire MkVcTrop cockpit section(Qldspitty)
Supermarine Spitfire MkVcTrop Reproduction(Qldspitty)
Supermarine Spitfire MkVIII taxiing replica with a meteor engine (G Adlam).
Same one is in Johnnie Johnsons book: ‘Wing Leader’.
Best Wishes.
Robert.
Quite a well known pictures isnt it?
Im sure its been featured in more that one Spitfire book over the years.
I was amazed to see that as many as 600 were built, why was so much effort put into an obvious loser when resources could have been put into it’s contemporary, the worlds apart Mosquito, instead, it smacks of political intrigue. It couldn’t even be compared to the usefullness of it’s predessesor, the Whitley and wasn’t much faster either.
If any aircraft should be confined to history and forgotten about, it has to be the Albemarle, lets confine ourselves to supporting better causes and send the surviving bits off to the smelter, the cash might pay to ressurect something more worthy of reconstructing.
First of all I will begin by saying that what one man wishes to do with his time or money is down to himself. I see a lot of projects on the forum and ask why but ultimately its not my money or time been ploughed into the said project. Maybe people think the same of my projects, thankfully as yet no one has derided them. The ultmate decision is down to the individual.
Personally I think you are a little wide of the mark with your comments about the aircraft been a loser. Maybe money & materials could have been better used on other aircraft and as to why so many were built when it was an underperformer is a perfectly valid debate.
But the fact of the matter is that although it was a failure as a medium bomber the type did prove usefull once converted for general and special transport duties albeit possibly only as a result of its failure in its intended role.
The aircraft took part in actions such as Normandy and the assault on Arnhem during Operation Market Garden so to suggest that the remaining parts should be sent to the smelter is wrong and I would suggest that a cockpit section of this type is a worthy memorial to those who did an important job that wasnt in a Lanc or a Spitfire etc etc.
Nobody mentioned the half scale protoype used for aerodynamic testing.
Now that would be cheaper to build and easier to find a home to display it in.
PFA homebuild project anyone? :rolleyes: