With Su-30 selling like hot cakes I doubt russia would be interested. Old F-16’s maybe.
The aviation component is held up by P-3’s which cannot stand up to Mig-29’s or harriers for that matter. PN has what a dozen helicopters and 3 modern subs?
Its shaping up to be a good coastal navy, but lets not get carried away.
Don’t see why IN would want a harpoon!! It already had better weapons available. Yes I think IN would love to get its hands on more Il-38 SD’s. But a toothless P-8 might not fly in IN colours.
Probably a lot more with brahmos-A.
LOL why? Would they not fly unless a harpoon was attached to them? If IN can modify IL-38 and Tu-142 to carry sea-eagle. I assume they can modify P-3c or P-8 to carry KH-35.
Why would india want harpoons??
Navy has already made up its mind on brahmos, Klub and Kh-35 to replace sea eagle. I also don’t see India buying P-3c’s anytime unless it could carry brahmos-A and Kh-35.
IN would of course like the E-2D or hawkeye 2000 if the govt approves.
Its tiny compared to what Pakistans neighbours (Iran and India) spend on their Navies.
With 9-12 odd Agostas/Marlins, 10 P-3Cs, and 8-10 modern Frigates. PN will still be a small force, but with a very hard punch.
IN is definitely a bigger and well rounded navy, hence more expenditure, but I am surprised by your claim that Iran spends more on its navy than PN??
They don’t even have a decent frigate or destroyer and only 3 kilo subs.
How dare you say that. They have to fight the powerful taleban airforce and al-qaeda navy. They need all the help.
On a serious note their surface fleet is never going to match up to IN. Subs are probably the most economical deterent for PN.
In theory, crashing a hi-jacked airliner into Pentagon would be ten times more laughable than the scenario of sinking a CVN class ship with Kh-59 launched from Su-30MK.
No see that has an element of surprise. What you suggest is exactly what would be anticipated. I don’t see a lumbering Su-30 Mk with ASMs surviving an onslaught from 2-3 times the number of F-18 E/F’s guided by awacs.
All this only works in theory kids. 50 Su-30 Mk’s will not stand up to the first raid by 100 F-15 + 100 F-18 with E-3 and E-2? How can someone even consider that US won’t just take out the important assets using long range tomahawk missiles? US can have 24 hour satellite surveillance, what would iran have? What SSGN? US would be the one using SSN and SSGN to take out important assets. Unless you guys are mistaking iran for russia, I don’t see any USN carrier going down.
Personally I think they should get Su 30s as fast as KNAAPO can produce them, because they are going to need them pretty soon… and S-400 too, lots of em.. and some A-50MK’s (;
If you mean against US I don’t see what difference 50 su-30Mk’s and a few batteries of s-400 can make except to delay the inevitable. But some how I am not that big a pessimist. Whats a A-50 MK? Are you refering to A-50 beriev as awacs?
Iran does want a plane thats home made but i don’t think they are stupid enough to want to make a plane of su-30Mk’s calibre right now. The F-5e knock offs can easily replace the older f-5 and maybe even mig-29?
Is there a air launched yakhont? Wouldn’t it be better than a subsonic kh-59 with same range?
Percieved threats will lead Congress to buy more Raptors.
Yes but there is only so much that iran can buy. They will buy 50-100 Su-30 MKP’s irrespective of wether US has 300 or 800 F-22’s. It does seem ideal to replace the aging F-14a’s. Does iran have air to air refuellers? That would give the Sukhoi’s the long range required. I would also assume a few air launched yakhont or kh-35 would be procured?
As long as Sukhoi can sell planes how does it matter how many F-22’s US buys?