dark light

Saturn5

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: hms invincible…for sale?…to who? #2083696
    Saturn5
    Participant

    After the decommissioning of 25. Mayo, Argentina does need a new carrier. 😉

    in reply to: The greatest submarine design ever. #2088785
    Saturn5
    Participant

    …The 212’s are new Greece should have a good run with them…

    Actually it’s Germany and Italy that is going to use the 212 class. Greece and South Korea are going to have 214’s which are bigger in size and have more tubes.

    in reply to: RAN Thread #2052831
    Saturn5
    Participant

    http://xs25.xs.to/pics/05164/HmasAnzac.jpg

    HMAS Anzac in northern hemisphare. Photo taken on 18 April 2005.

    in reply to: USS Liberty Incident #2053438
    Saturn5
    Participant

    For those who have access to USNI Proceedings magazine there is a very interesting article called “Liberty Victims Did Not Die in Vain” by Mr. Anthony R. Wells about the USS Liberty incident on March issue. It is highly recommended.

    in reply to: hangar and flight deck dimensions #2057419
    Saturn5
    Participant

    Saturn 5,
    you could try these:

    Courtesy Thales Naval Nederland

    more renders from Thales

    Hope this helps

    7seas, your renderings will surely help me. Thank you very much. I have just one question are these renderings made to a scale or not?

    Regards

    PS: Do you also write at the forum of warship1.com? I think I saw your postings there

    in reply to: hangar and flight deck dimensions #2057532
    Saturn5
    Participant

    I guess it would be easiest to measure them from photos. No online data about that known.

    Thank you for responding. 🙂

    I have tried to measure the dimensions of hangars from photos. But it is without any professional equipment almost to no avail.
    1.The lens of the camera distorts the objects. For example I have seen some photos where the two sides of the hangar door which are parallel to each other in realty are not parallel at all.
    2.The most of the photos showing the flight deck area of a ship are not taken from stern of the ship but from starboard or port quarters with an angle. Therefore it is difficult the calculate the real measurements of the objects (the ship the hangar the helicopter etc)

    This is why I am asking it online.

    in reply to: hangar and flight deck dimensions #2057611
    Saturn5
    Participant

    🙁

    Hi,

    Ok, I have given up the dimensions of flight decks. Can anybody tell me or give me an online source for the hangar sizes of Knox, Meko 200 TN, Meko 200 PN, Standart (Elli), Perry?

    in reply to: USS America goes down next month… #2057613
    Saturn5
    Participant

    Isn’t it considered a curse to rename a ship in naval tradition? Certainly didn’t work out for the “Deutschland/Lutzow”, she was blown apaprt by Norwegian coastal batteries in 1940…., unless I’m mistaken as I seem to think that was the cruiser Blucher’s fate :confused:

    I know that I’m driftin from the topic but Lützow did survived the Norwegian coastal batteries. She was badly damaged by three 6-ton Tallboy bombs dropped by the Royal Air Force in April, 1945 as it lay off Swinemünde, and she came to rest on the bottom. She was repaired, and then did further support of the army; and was finally scuttled by her crew in May.

    in reply to: Mistral class #2061562
    Saturn5
    Participant

    I’m not a marine engineer, but as far as I understand it the centre of gravity is more important than the height.

    @Terran: You are right. The center of gravity is more important than the height. And besides the ship in pictures is still under contruction. As more and more systems are fitted she will sink a little bit. But never the less she looks to too narrow for her height.

    in reply to: Submarine run aground #2061679
    Saturn5
    Participant

    As the submarines have no pennant number it is almost imposible to tell.

    But the general look (esp. the location fo diving planes) of the submarine fits the look of USS San Francisco. Therefore IMHo it is USS S.F.

    in reply to: Mistral class #2061718
    Saturn5
    Participant

    Isn’t the ship to high for its beam? It suppose she will roll a lot in rough seas.

    in reply to: Submarine speeds #2063118
    Saturn5
    Participant

    Here is some information about the submerged speed of USN submarines:

    Ohio class: 25 Kts
    Virginia class: 35 kts
    Sea Wolf class: 35+ kts
    Los Angeles class: 30+ kts

    Source: USNI Combat Fleets 2002

    According to Tom Clancy’s Submarine book the Los Angeles class is designed to achieve speeds greater than 35 kts submerged.

    in reply to: Submarine run aground #2063271
    Saturn5
    Participant

    I suppose, unlike the submarine, the career of the skipper of San Francisco did not survive the underwater collision.

    More details come to surface: The submarine was returning to her homeport in Guam form a port visit in Brisbane Australia.

    More news @:http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200501/s1278902.htm

    in reply to: Cyprus Pocket Navy – Photos #2064595
    Saturn5
    Participant

    About 11 and 12

    @Twilight2002:

    The boats number 11 and 12 are an old Soviet design. They are called Type 083 or P 6 Class. Made of wood, the design dates back to fifties.

    Displacement: 73 tons
    Dimensions: 26 x 6 x 1,5 metres
    Speed: 41 knots

    in reply to: "The Mightiest" (P.Velikiy) #2065550
    Saturn5
    Participant

    Hops! 🙂 Now I know which bars you mean.

    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Images/Talwar17.jpg

    They do not look as if they are there to support the system. They seem to have handles and hinges.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 48 total)