dark light

galdri

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,150 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Unidentified "bomb drop" panel #952409
    galdri
    Participant

    Jerry,
    It is a possibility, but the part in question has a very “British” inspection stamp – an E with in a circle (see the fourth picture down) – that I´ve never seen on an American built part. I suspect the Northrops had all American equipment, but I´ll see what I can find on t´net

    in reply to: Unidentified "bomb drop" panel #952499
    galdri
    Participant

    Thank you guys.
    There were no fighter bombers of British manufacture based in Iceland during the war. The only British built, landbased fighter to be regularly based on the island were the 6 Hurricanes of 1423 fighter flight in 1941 – the air defense of Iceland was taken over by the Americans in August of that year using P39´s and P40´s.

    Carrier based fighters are a different story – pretty much everything the FAA used came through Iceland at one point or another. Could this possibly be from an FAA aircraft?

    Regarding the Battle idea, all 98 squadron aircraft are accounted for, and none of them crashed into the see to the west of the country.

    Would be nice to find out what this is!

    Regards

    in reply to: Seeking Galdri #984541
    galdri
    Participant

    Still alive and lurking on the forum ;):D

    in reply to: A few from the 60s and 70s #1072491
    galdri
    Participant

    Scouse,
    Please tell me that you have some high quality shots of the Yak 18PM that is visible in the AN-2 shot!!
    Finding periodic shots of the Yak 18PM is proving to be more than a little difficult!

    in reply to: A new Sea Fury for Europe – and already there #1072494
    galdri
    Participant

    Tim,
    You should have given the heads up that you were headed my way!!! We sure could have met up and done some hangar flying!

    Regards,
    Sigurjon

    in reply to: Cockpit shots of Viscount needed #1021387
    galdri
    Participant

    Thanks again TerryP,
    I´ve learned something new today!
    The Viscounts that were here were series 759D´s so I guess that applies to them.

    in reply to: Cockpit shots of Viscount needed #1030476
    galdri
    Participant

    Thanks again TerryP,
    I´ve learned something new today!
    The Viscounts that were here were series 759D´s so I guess that applies to them.

    in reply to: Cockpit shots of Viscount needed #1022208
    galdri
    Participant

    Thanks TerryP,
    The seat we have is an exact match to the one on the right in your post. So Viscount it is. One thing is puzzling me a bit – in your drawing it is called a “Radio Operator´s Chair”. I didn´t realize the Viscount had a radio operator. Was this standard on all Viscounts?

    in reply to: Cockpit shots of Viscount needed #1031423
    galdri
    Participant

    Thanks TerryP,
    The seat we have is an exact match to the one on the right in your post. So Viscount it is. One thing is puzzling me a bit – in your drawing it is called a “Radio Operator´s Chair”. I didn´t realize the Viscount had a radio operator. Was this standard on all Viscounts?

    in reply to: Korean Air Cargo Boeing 777 Freighter #557268
    galdri
    Participant

    Aren´t they to be operated by SouthernAir – probably owned by some leasing company??
    Sorry if I´m wrong, it´s just something I seem to remember!

    galdri
    Participant

    After years of reading (by “experts” here) how obsolete the 767s are, I wonder what FedEx’s reasons are?

    Well, the 767s as we know them today are in fact obsolete, and would have been at the end of their useful live if the U.S. Air Force had not selected them as their future Tanker. The Air Force procurement will mean the 767 stays in production for a lot longer (25 – 30 years), and it will also mean that money is available to redesign parts of the aircraft that are becoming a bit “tired” – all paid by Uncle Sam – Boeing would be fools not to let the technology “slip” onto the civilian side!

    The Air Force procurement will mean that there will be a new wing on the aircraft – the New Generation 767 – 300 will have the same airfoil as the unpopular 767 – 400. It will mean basically the same airfoil as the 777. The 767NG will also benefit from new, more fuel efficient engines, the cockpit upgrades introduced on the -400 will be standard on the 767NG and so on and so forth.

    With the product Boeing is offering, I´m not the least surprised that FedEx have bitten the bullet and ordered some.

    in reply to: Post war use of Mosquitos by Transport Command #1063233
    galdri
    Participant

    Vampiredave,
    Thank you very much for the suggestion about the aircraft being PR34. After careful studying of the photographs, I can make out the camera port in the starboard bomb bay door.

    in reply to: Post war use of Mosquitos by Transport Command #1063361
    galdri
    Participant

    Thank you for that guys

    in reply to: Post war use of Mosquitos by Transport Command #1065886
    galdri
    Participant

    Martin,
    Thanks an awful lot for this. I think we might have a winner! Post war landing of Mosquitoes in Iceland can not have been that common.

    in reply to: Post war use of Mosquitos by Transport Command #1066039
    galdri
    Participant

    Oh, and by the way. I´m pretty sure the pictures I´ve got are taken at Keflavik

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,150 total)